Re: [sa-list] RE: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip)

2007-10-10 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Bret Miller wrote: sa-update does NOT feed a local blocklist generated by *my* particular corpus of spam emails. Think of it as the RBL equivalent of sitewide-bayes. Or think of it as a way of SA saying when I get twelve spams of score 10+ from ip 208.23.118.172...I

Re: [sa-list] Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport,

2007-10-08 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Rob McEwen wrote: Therefore, I recommend that you re-think your choices here! Don't let your quest for guaranteed long-term perfection keep you from making **substantial** progress today! Rob, Then help rally the SA team to include those RBLs that you mentioned in the

Re: [sa-list] Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport,

2007-10-08 Thread Bill Landry
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Rob McEwen wrote: Therefore, I recommend that you re-think your choices here! Don't let your quest for guaranteed long-term perfection keep you from making **substantial** progress today! Rob, Then help rally the SA team to include

Re: [sa-list] Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport,

2007-10-08 Thread Rob McEwen
Dan, Then help rally the SA team to include those RBLs that you mentioned in the stock config. My RBL (ivmSIP.com) wouldn't work as a default value in SA because it is only available via RSYNC or Zone Transfer to subscribers (or... currently... testers who have specifically requested access).

RE: [sa-list] Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport,

2007-10-08 Thread Anthony Kamau
-Original Message- From: Dan Mahoney, System Admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 9 October 2007 7:14 AM To: Rob McEwen Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: [sa-list] Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Rob