Re: SA 3.3, Debian and *BL...

2015-03-04 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 04.03.2015 um 18:46 schrieb Marco Gaiarin: mar 4 18:26:15.655 [21702] dbg: dns: NS lookup of 172.0.0.1 using 127.0.0.1 failed, no results found ?! why try to resolve localhost with localhost? beause any sane configured nameserver has to respond? https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1912.txt

Re: SA 3.3, Debian and *BL...

2015-03-04 Thread Axb
On 03/04/2015 05:47 PM, Marco Gaiarin wrote: Greetings to all the list. I'm using SA by some years, and my setup get clearly complex as time passes. I'm using, for SA box, Debian stable, version 3.3.2-5+deb7u3; all setup (at least 4) are similar, with a similar config file, but with different

Re: SA 3.3, Debian and *BL...

2015-03-04 Thread Marco Gaiarin
Mandi! Axb In chel di` si favelave... dns_available yes Ok, i have: dns_available test: 172.0.0.1 there's a local bind instance as a cache resolver... skip_rbl_checks 0 skip_uribl_checks 0 AFAI've understood '0' is the default, anyway forced to '0'. also see:

SA 3.3, Debian and *BL...

2015-03-04 Thread Marco Gaiarin
Greetings to all the list. I'm using SA by some years, and my setup get clearly complex as time passes. I'm using, for SA box, Debian stable, version 3.3.2-5+deb7u3; all setup (at least 4) are similar, with a similar config file, but with different hardware and networks/ISP (so, DNS servers).

Re: SA 3.3, Debian and *BL...

2015-03-04 Thread Mark Martinec
dns_available yes Marco Gaiarin wrote: Ok, i have: dns_available test: 172.0.0.1 That's wrong. The documentation tells that you need to specify a domain name there, and that SpamAssassin will test for a NS record of that domain name: | dns_available { yes | no | test[: domain1