On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 01:30:15PM -0800, Loren Wilton wrote:
> This is a home system with only a few users. All users have "Spam" and "Ham"
> folders showing up in their email program of choice, and they just drag
> messages they do or don't like into the appropriate folders. There are
>
From: "Reindl Harald"
in other words a system for morons - morons which will drag mails to spam
instead click on "unsubscribe"
per-user bayes don't work well, never
Well Harald, you are certainly welcome to your opinion. It would be nicer if
you had kept it yourself though.
The system
the new spam and ham (respectively) get merged into
these folders after learning, and removed from the current Spam and Ham folders.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Grant
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org ; Loren Wilton ; hg user
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2023 12:47 PM
On 20 February 2023 12:28:00 CET, Loren Wilton wrote:
>
> A cron job that will harvest Spam and Ham mboxes and feed them to sa-learn
> once a day, then archive the learned messages. Per-user bayes and learning.
> Mail is hand-moved into the spam and ham learning folders, and for my
> personal
> Can you please give me some details on your bayes setup?
> Headers exclusion, bayes_token_sources, how do you "sa-learn" messages...
Standard options on Bayes. No autolearn. A cron job that will harvest Spam and
Ham mboxes and feed them to sa-learn once a day, then archive the learned
Can you please give me some details on your bayes setup? Headers
exclusion, bayes_token_sources, how do you "sa-learn" messages...
thank you
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 11:53 PM Loren Wilton wrote:
> > The real question is: has bayes still its use case in 2023 ? Is it still
> used with important
> The real question is: has bayes still its use case in 2023 ? Is it still used
> with important scores or just to flag messages for a review?
It works fine for me here.
>
>
> bayes_token_sources none visible uri mimepart
>
I added this line to my config with no changes in the tokens used to sum
the bayes score, headers still used. It may be a command only recognized
during learning but I should check the sources.
> perhaps OP has bayes_token_sources setting
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 01:02:25PM +0200, Henrik K wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:18:50AM +0100, hg user wrote:
> > Every score is based on headers, very generic headers. and some
> > related to my setup.
> >
> > Not a single token from the message body
>
> The Bayes implementation has
I've updated 23_bayes_ignore_header.cf
(last update was from 2016 :)
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/axb/23_bayes_ignore_header.cf
Axb
On 2/16/23 14:17, Dave Wreski wrote:
Here's also another 50+ headers we've collected over the years that I
believe started
Hi,
Here's also another 50+ headers we've collected over the years that I
believe started as a list from AXB 10+ years ago.
https://pastebin.com/raw/f6Fwh8HJ
dave
On 2/16/23 6:02 AM, Henrik K wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:18:50AM +0100, hg user wrote:
I was investigating a bunch of
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:18:50AM +0100, hg user wrote:
> I was investigating a bunch of bitcoin spam: different titles,
> different senders (all from gmail), different text, different pdf
> attachment.
>
> Unfortunately in those days my bayes db was polluted and they all got
> a BAYES_50, 0.8.
I was investigating a bunch of bitcoin spam: different titles,
different senders (all from gmail), different text, different pdf
attachment.
Unfortunately in those days my bayes db was polluted and they all got
a BAYES_50, 0.8.
I tested the messages now with a recreated bayes db and got some
13 matches
Mail list logo
