On Jul 3, 2008, at 12:14 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Please, don't send private replies, I did not ask for
them.
On 02.07.08 21:32, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Its impossible to know who wants them, and who does not.
my mail headers contain Mail-Followup-To: header that is only sent
On 03.07.08 17:58, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Jo Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 3, 2008, at 12:14 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Please, don't send private replies, I did not ask for
them.
On 02.07.08 21:32, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Its impossible to know who wants them, and who
Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
He is acted as is common and expected.
No, people are expected to keep discussions on the list. Sending private
copies may result in discussing off-the-list.
True. So reply-all leads to mail on-list (notwithstanding the mail sent
I'm sorry, but what MUA recognizes those? Why don' t you set Reply-
To: which will be honored by all MUAs?
snip
He is acted as is common and expected. Others who, like you, don't
want private copies set Reply-To.
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net
Robert - elists wrote:
[snip]
I don't get why the list software doesn't take care of this so we never have
this issue.
This has been debated to death here and elsewhere. please search the
archives and/or google before bringing this religious debate again.
Isn't one of the people that
At 10:34 04-07-2008, Robert - elists wrote:
I don't get why the list software doesn't take care of this so we never have
this issue.
It's a question of choice. If the list software takes care of it,
then the MUA cannot set a preference. There is a tendency to fix
list software for the
mouss writes:
Please let's kill this thread.
- Matus and few others will keep shouting when people send them private
copies.
- The rest of us don't care
- Earth will keep turing...
+1
--j.
On Fre, 2008-07-04 at 10:34 -0700, Robert - elists wrote:
[]
h
I don't get why the list software doesn't take care of this so we never have
this issue.
Because it's a decision of the mail sender (read: you and me) if he
wants a private copy (additionally to the public one over the
On 02.07.08 13:55, NGSS wrote:
To: 'Matus UHLAR - fantomas' [EMAIL PROTECTED],
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Please, don't send private replies, I did not ask for
them.
On 02.07.08 21:32, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Its impossible to know who wants them, and who does not.
my mail
On Jul 3, 2008, at 12:14 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Please, don't send private replies, I did not ask for
them.
On 02.07.08 21:32, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Its impossible to know who wants them, and who does not.
my mail headers contain Mail-Followup-To: header that is only sent
to
Jo Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 3, 2008, at 12:14 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Please, don't send private replies, I did not ask for
them.
On 02.07.08 21:32, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Its impossible to know who wants them, and who does not.
my mail headers contain
On 02.07.08 13:55, NGSS wrote:
To: 'Matus UHLAR - fantomas' [EMAIL PROTECTED],
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Please, don't send private replies, I did not ask for them.
Yah I think it is just too aggressive, I included a handful of rules
Is there any forum or website that discuss
On 02.07.08 13:55, NGSS wrote:
To: 'Matus UHLAR - fantomas' [EMAIL PROTECTED],
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Please, don't send private replies, I did not ask for
them.
Its impossible to know who wants them, and who does not. Someone who does not
sit here and read all messages thru may
Thanks for the response.
Yah I think it is just too aggressive, I included a handful of rules
Is there any forum or website that discuss about (lists of ) rules that is
likely to result in more false positives ?
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
14 matches
Mail list logo
