On Jun 22, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
The only case an unlimited trust would be useful is if you trust the
mail, even if the host relays mail from untrusted hosts. But if the
sources are untrusted, why are you trusting the mail just because it
came through some super-trusted
On Jun 20, 2008, at 1:19 PM, Henrik K wrote:
You should know by now what SA network settings do. I don't know how
complex
your setup really is for them not to work.
It's not complex at all. Everything is external, there are no
firewalls. All public IP space documented in the external
On 25.06.08 01:29, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Jun 22, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
The only case an unlimited trust would be useful is if you trust the
mail, even if the host relays mail from untrusted hosts. But if the
sources are untrusted, why are you trusting the mail just because
On Jun 25, 2008, at 2:50 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
As described in previous e-mails, host A cannot talk to host C except
to relay via host B.
Host A is trusted if relayed by host B.
(anything is trusted if relayed by host B)
If Host A appears to be connecting to host C, then it's
On Jun 25, 2008, at 2:50 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
As described in previous e-mails, host A cannot talk to host C except
to relay via host B.
Host A is trusted if relayed by host B.
(anything is trusted if relayed by host B)
If Host A appears to be connecting to host C, then
Because it's a public mail server which gets legitimate mail
connections from all over the world.
I mean, why to accept connections from anything other?
I don't understand your question. My only answer you quoted above.
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy,
Jo Rhett wrote:
I just realized something re: the previous message about SPF failure.
trusted_hosts is also apparently blocking whitelist_from_rcvd from
working.
misconfigured trusted/internal networks breaks *MANY* things in
SpamAssassin. Pretty much everything that looks at Received:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jo Rhett schrieb:
| Why not allow me to say I trust everything from this host no matter
what?
Why would you run the mails through SpamAssassin if you trust everything
from that host? A whitelist entry in the MTA would avoid wasting
resources on
I just realized something re: the previous message about SPF failure.
trusted_hosts is also apparently blocking whitelist_from_rcvd from
working.
This is getting out of control. I understand the original intent
here, but basically what is happening is that by making a host
trusted you
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:08:01AM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
I just realized something re: the previous message about SPF failure.
trusted_hosts is also apparently blocking whitelist_from_rcvd from
working.
This is getting out of control. I understand the original intent here,
but
On Jun 20, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Henrik K wrote:
whitelist_from_rcvd is checked on external (internal_networks) border.
If you set up internal and trusted right, there are no problems.
Why not allow me to say I trust everything from this host no matter
what?
I could possibly set
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 01:01:53PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Jun 20, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Henrik K wrote:
whitelist_from_rcvd is checked on external (internal_networks) border.
If you set up internal and trusted right, there are no problems.
Why not allow me to say I trust everything from this
12 matches
Mail list logo
