Help I am listed on blacklists

2008-11-30 Thread Lars Ebeling
Original Message From: mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: John Hardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Lars Ebeling [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 8:26 PM Subject: Re: Help I am listed on blacklists John Hardin a écrit : On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, Lars

Tagging the mail which already has X-Spam headers

2008-11-30 Thread Nikita Kipriyanov
Hello, SpamAssassin tags mail with headers X-Spam- But, what if there were some headers like these, as with mail that already passed someones SpamAssassin and has X-Spam-Score, before being recieved by my server? Will it remove them, replace them or simply add new ones? In the latter case,

Re: Tagging the mail which already has X-Spam headers

2008-11-30 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 16:22 +0300, Nikita Kipriyanov wrote: Will it remove them, replace them or simply add new ones? In the latter case, how do I tell headers, added by my SpamAssassin, from headers, that were there before my mail server? SA adds a new set of headers. Look at the

Re: Tagging the mail which already has X-Spam headers

2008-11-30 Thread mouss
Nikita Kipriyanov a écrit : Hello, SpamAssassin tags mail with headers X-Spam- But, what if there were some headers like these, as with mail that already passed someones SpamAssassin and has X-Spam-Score, before being recieved by my server? Will it remove them, replace them or simply

Re: Tagging the mail which already has X-Spam headers

2008-11-30 Thread Chris
On Sunday 30 November 2008 7:22 am, Nikita Kipriyanov wrote: Hello, SpamAssassin tags mail with headers X-Spam- But, what if there were some headers like these, as with mail that already passed someones SpamAssassin and has X-Spam-Score, before being recieved by my server? Will it

OS Upgrade Broke SpamAssassin; Help Needed to Fix

2008-11-30 Thread Rich Shepard
I (finally) upgraded my main server/workstation from Slackware-11.0 to -12.0. After rebooting into the newer kernel, the mail system wasn't working. Postfix was OK, and I traced the problem to SpamAssassin. Version 3.1.7 was installed. Some perl modules needed to be upgraded, so I did those

Re: OS Upgrade Broke SpamAssassin; Help Needed to Fix

2008-11-30 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Mon, December 1, 2008 01:39, Rich Shepard wrote: still have the MTA working. you have installed 3.2.5 from cpan and 3.1.7 in rpm ? newer install cpan builds when host os is rpm based google cpan2rpm -- Benny Pedersen Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098

Re: OS Upgrade Broke SpamAssassin; Help Needed to Fix

2008-11-30 Thread Rich Shepard
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Benny Pedersen wrote: you have installed 3.2.5 from cpan and 3.1.7 in rpm ? Benny, Slackware doesn't use rpms. The slack packages end in .tgz and that's what the package tools work with. Rich -- Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | Integrity

Re: OS Upgrade Broke SpamAssassin; Help Needed to Fix

2008-11-30 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Mon, December 1, 2008 02:34, Rich Shepard wrote: On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Benny Pedersen wrote: you have installed 3.2.5 from cpan and 3.1.7 in rpm ? Slackware doesn't use rpms. The slack packages end in .tgz and that's what the package tools work with. pas then -- Benny Pedersen Need more

Re: OS Upgrade Broke SpamAssassin; Help Needed to Fix

2008-11-30 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 04:39:49PM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /usr/local/bin/spamassassin -V spamassassin: spamassassin script is v3.001007, but using modules v3.002005 How should I proceed to fix the installation so there's only one copy (either in

Card/Gift/Shopping Spam (or: More Spam Reduction Techniques)

2008-11-30 Thread Neil
I'm seeing a lot of shopping, gifts, prizes, and cards (ie. credit card, gift card) related spam in the last week or so. (Maybe due to Black Friday?) I'm using Sought, Bayes, and default rules. Is there anything I can do to reduce the amount of spam getting through? I've already knocked

Spamd and ipv6

2008-11-30 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
Since getting my hosts natively speaking ipv6, I've been seeing a lot of initial timeouts connecting to spamc, because I believe it's apparently trying ipv6 first. spamc: connect to spamd on 2001:470:1f07:a7f::1 failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused spamc: connect to spamd on

Re: Spamd and ipv6

2008-11-30 Thread SM
At 21:45 30-11-2008, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: Since getting my hosts natively speaking ipv6, I've been seeing a lot of initial timeouts connecting to spamc, because I believe it's apparently trying ipv6 first. spamc: connect to spamd on 2001:470:1f07:a7f::1 failed, retrying (#1 of

Re: Tagging the mail which already has X-Spam headers

2008-11-30 Thread Nikita Kipriyanov
mouss пишет: you can preserve them by rewriting them before passing the message to SA. for example, with postfix, you can use header checks: /^(X-Spam-*)/ X-$1 will add an X- to the header names. Shouldn't this break some special things like DKIM signatures?

Re: [sa-list] Re: Spamd and ipv6

2008-11-30 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, SM wrote: At 21:45 30-11-2008, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: Since getting my hosts natively speaking ipv6, I've been seeing a lot of initial timeouts connecting to spamc, because I believe it's apparently trying ipv6 first. spamc: connect to spamd on

Re: Tagging the mail which already has X-Spam headers

2008-11-30 Thread mouss
Nikita Kipriyanov a écrit : mouss пишет: you can preserve them by rewriting them before passing the message to SA. for example, with postfix, you can use header checks: /^(X-Spam-*)/X-$1 argh. I meant /^(X-Spam-*)/REPLACE X-$1 will add an X- to the header names. Shouldn't