On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 19:14 -0700, clem...@dwf.com wrote:
How do I tell if sa-update is actually running?
I mean, yes, I can run it by hand and get no error messages, and with -D
I dont see any problems, still I feel that my stuff isnt current, and that
there
should be an update.
Should I
Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Upgrade to SVN version this is a issue with RC1.
It looks to me like one of the devs fixed the rule. I'm still running
rc1, but the errors have disappeared.
On Friday 08 January 2010 15:16:26 Jason Bertoch wrote:
Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Upgrade to SVN version this is a issue with RC1.
It looks to me like one of the devs fixed the rule. I'm still running
rc1, but the errors have disappeared.
Yes, it's been fixed yesterday evening, but it
Hi!
Upgrade to SVN version this is a issue with RC1.
It looks to me like one of the devs fixed the rule. I'm still running rc1,
but the errors have disappeared.
Ah okay perfect!
Thanks,
Raymond.
The way it works is you rsync the zone on a scheule, and rbldnsd serves
it. We subscribed to it for a while and liked it, just wished they had
some different pricing tiers. We setup a virtual machine to do the
rsyncing/rbldnsd and had our main dns servers (as used by the
resolv.conf on the
From: Christian Brel
Sensible folk know people like Return Path will never grow
the balls to stand up to eBay, they will just take the money
and smile.
Christian Brel,
are you suggesting that orgs like Return Path buy some body part growth
pharma ?
;-
- rh
Hi,
I have qmail running with the
:allow,QMAILQUEUE=/usr/bin/qmail-spamc
in /etc/tcp.smtp
I have some hams/spams that I want to run sa-learn against, but I
can't figure out which database it is qmail filters through. Is it the
db of the user spamd, root or some qmail user account?
Anyone
Please reply to list. This reply is to list...
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Richard B. Emerson wrote:
: Actually, the example note has To: bab...@yahoogroups.com not To:
: ch...@pinefields.com...
The To header is irrelevant. Mail to this list is addressed To: the
list. But the *envelope* (which is
Ooops. Sorry. A poster replied offlist, and when I attempted to put
it back on-list, I lamely inserted the SA users list address instead of
the procmail list address. (smack forehead)
Disregard.
-C
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Charles Gregory wrote:
: Please reply to list. This reply is to list...
Quoting Raymond Dijkxhoorn raym...@prolocation.net:
Hi!
Can't you do zone transfers? Then you can do away with the
subscriber_key thing and have DNS resolve locally for spamhaus.org and
not have to query their DNS servers.
They sell datafeed and they sell queries, we bought queries. I do
clem...@dwf.com a écrit :
How do I tell if sa-update is actually running?
I mean, yes, I can run it by hand and get no error messages, and with -D
I dont see any problems, still I feel that my stuff isnt current, and that
there
should be an update.
Should I be getting a message in
I have qmail running with the
:allow,QMAILQUEUE=/usr/bin/qmail-spamc
in /etc/tcp.smtp
I have some hams/spams that I want to run sa-learn against, but I
can't figure out which database it is qmail filters through. Is it the
db of the user spamd, root or some qmail user account?
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue does belong to qmailq so does this mean
that I should run sa-learn under qmailq?
I did some tests and this doesn't make any sense.
I put required_score 7 into /var/qmail/.spamassass/user_prefs
and ran
su qmailq -c spamc sample_email.txt
but the output still shows
Here's a script correction for an obvious mistake that I managed not to spot.
In summary, it is:
s/$chkd/$sau/
IOW the script should read:
==
#!/bin/bash
#
# Update the Spamassassin rules
#
sau=/usr/bin/sa-update
if [ -x
http://www.zimbra.com/forums/administrators/36295-every-new-message-flagged-exploit-pdf-9669-nothing-getting-through.html
How do I disable False positives with clam
For now I am disabling clam totally on all servers .. anyway real
viruses are so few.
15 matches
Mail list logo
