From: tonjg [mailto:t...@freeuk.com]
On 01/13/2010 07:22 PM, tonjg wrote:
thanks for your response Ned.
your last line describes exactly what I want to do - reject
mail, do it at the smtp stage in sendmail - but I don't know
how to achieve this.
--
TonJ,
I occasionally get a spam leaking through without having been processed
by SA despite passing the part of my procmail filtering where SA is
called. These spams are always at the time of scheduled SA restarts so I
assume they slip through while it is down. SA is called as below, is
there
On 15.1.2010 10:21, geoff.spamassass...@alphaworks.co.uk wrote:
I occasionally get a spam leaking through without having been processed
by SA despite passing the part of my procmail filtering where SA is
called. These spams are always at the time of scheduled SA restarts so I
assume they slip
R-Elists wrote:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=sendmail+reject+spam+smtp
wow thanks a million
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/newbie%3A-configure-SA-to-reject-spam-tp27149042p27174842.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:42:48 +0200
Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
On 15.1.2010 10:21, geoff.spamassass...@alphaworks.co.uk wrote:
I occasionally get a spam leaking through without having been
processed by SA despite passing the part of my procmail filtering
where SA is called. These
Yesterday one of our servers started having problems. I found the following
messages in the syslog file:
Jan 14 14:12:38 localhost spamd[20926]: spamd: respawning server at
/usr/local/bin/spamd line 1080.
Jan 14 14:12:38 localhost spamd[20927]: spamd: respawning server at
/usr/local/bin/spamd
Brent Gardner wrote:
Anybody seen headers like this?
X-SI: 538
X-EN: 1470024
X-SE: 69846
X-EV: 0
X-Job: 69846
X-SO: 2
I've seen them (or similar headers) in messages that passed through one
or another third-party spam filter services (eg Postini, Messagelabs).
If you can correlate the
1. It shows up as internal mail so gets -6 points or so from the
auto-whitelist thus giving it a decent chance of getting through.
If it shows up as internal mail even though its external something is
wrong.
The AWL takes both the renders email address and the sending systems
IP-address
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301125
hope it gets resolved now, point for me is that 3.2.5 is only marked
unstable in gentoo, and i tryed to make another server with just
stable ebuilds to see where remaining problems is
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
since 3.2.1 is still stable in gentoo portage [...]
3.2.5 is only marked unstable in gentoo
old - historical - rotten - decaying - stable
On 15/01/2010 11:42 AM, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
Yesterday one of our servers started having problems. I found the following
messages in the syslog file:
Jan 14 14:12:38 localhost spamd[20926]: spamd: respawning server at
/usr/local/bin/spamd line 1080.
Jan 14 14:12:38 localhost
11 matches
Mail list logo