Hi,
we have an application developed using a PostgreSQL Database that we
are now trying to deploy on a MS SQL Server. Problem is that any
database error that occurs (e.G. violation of unique constraints)
makes that access to the table involved in the transaction is blobked
for all users
Just a suggestion: maybe you guys can find it in your hearts to ignore
trolls from now on.
+1
I also think it will be a mature decision.
+1 what's happening here and on that TSS thread sounds (or maybe is) a bit
childish
Hi,
we also have a production app running T5 http://www.smatch.com, very
stable, up and running.
Cheers,
Martin
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 21:14 +0100, Jan Vissers wrote:
Hi,
I have an opportunity to use T5 (5.0.11) in an assignment. My question is;
is it safe for me to do so? The application
Add spring-web.jar or spring-webmvc.jar to your classpath.
(Which one depends on which Spring version you use.
RequestUtils moved from spring-web.jar to spring-webmvc.jar in version 2.5)
tapestry5-acegi does not bring it in automatically.
HTH,
Olle
2008/3/27, Jacob Bergoo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I had developed a crud system using tapestry-5-0-5, it works fine!
and i will upgrade to the latest version.
2008/3/27, Martin Grotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
we also have a production app running T5 http://www.smatch.com, very
stable, up and running.
Cheers,
Martin
On Wed, 2008-03-26
Hi all,
we are migrating from tapestry 4.0.2 to 4.1.5
we were using tacos 4.0 with the previous version and now in tapestry
4.1we have deleted tacos and
we are facing problem in changing tacos components (tacos:ajaxEventSubmit
and tacos:FloatingPane)
Please suggest us on this issue..
Hi!
I would really like to start using T5 for new modules in my web application.
The problem is that I have a lot of struts and T4 pages that needs to
co-exist with T5-pages under the same application context, I'm already
making struts and T4 cooperate in a slightly messy way. I can't afford the
I use Hibernate / Spring / JTDS / SQL Server 2000. I've seen no such issues
when dealing with problems.
What does Enterprise Manager or Management Studio say about Current
Activity? Is there a lock being held by one process?
If so, then either you or tapestry-hibernate needs to commit or
Anyone?
-Original Message-
From: Zheng, Xiahong
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 3:09 PM
To: 'Tapestry users'
Subject: [T5] Ajax validation
If this topic has been discussed, please point me to the right place. It
seems that, by default, tapestry 5 only does client side validation when
Hi everybody.
I am trying to integrate tapestry 5 with Acegi security.
The authentication provider that I am using is LDAP based.
I see that most of the examples refer to using DAOAuthentication
provider.
Just checking if there is someone who used LDAP for the authentication.
I
A typical t:textfield t:id=foo t:validate=required size=5/
automatically produce client-side validation. Just wondering whether it
produce server-side validation counterparts and enforce on the server-side
as well? Obviously, it goes from Tapestry validation language to
JavaScript. I'd think
Just disable JavaScript and you will see that client side validation is
duplicated with server-side one.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 3:30 PM, samlai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A typical t:textfield t:id=foo t:validate=required size=5/
automatically produce client-side validation. Just wondering
Yes, tapestry's built-in validators validate both client and server-
side.
Robert
On Mar 27, 2008, at 3/279:30 AM , samlai wrote:
A typical t:textfield t:id=foo t:validate=required size=5/
automatically produce client-side validation. Just wondering
whether it
produce server-side
Olle Hallin wrote:
Add spring-web.jar or spring-webmvc.jar to your classpath.
(Which one depends on which Spring version you use.
RequestUtils moved from spring-web.jar to spring-webmvc.jar in version
2.5)
tapestry5-acegi does not bring it in automatically.
HTH,
Olle
Thanks
I think you need to do this yourself, using the builtin AJAX
facilities, rather than using any of the builtin validation facilities.
Say you were looking to make sure a username was unique on signup.
Place an actionlink beside the field (check availability). The
actionlink would need
Thanks for the clarification. I was wondering if such capability already
exists in T5. I like the mixin approach since it doesn't require another
click.
-Original Message-
From: Julian Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 11:39 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re:
Anybody tested formfragment/mixin on IE6? I could not get the fragment
to show on IE6. It does work on firefox however. Is this a known issue
or am I missing something?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
I think there is an issue, although it works partially. If you click
on the checkbox it doesn't slide the fragment down. However, a
subsequent click anywhere on the page will slide it down causing the
process and checkbox to be out of sync. I implemented my own toggle
functionality so it wasn't
It's not possible; Tapestry 4 and Tapestry 5 use overlapping package
names and (in all likelihood) overapping class names. There was a
point where I had to decide on a root package: org.apache.tapestry5 or
org.apache.tapestry ... I chose the latter. Hopefully, that's the
worst mistake I've made.
I am seeing another problem; On submit from the fragment, I don't get
any input values bound to the fragment fields. Has anybody seen it?
-Original Message-
From: Adam Zimowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 1:01 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: [T5]
That could be by design. If your fragment is hidden values won't be
submitted. If it's shown, they should be submitted and I never had
this problem as they do submit correctly for me. I tested it with all
kinds of browsers and it works well aside from issue with javascript
slide down I mentioned
Here are the relevant portions (with identifying info stripped out) for
authentication with Active Directory. With AD, you need to use bind-based
authentication.
If you are using something like OpenLDAP, you may have access to the
password or password hash, so you would change the authenticator.
I am not sure why it is not working for me. Here is my simple test page,
NewPosition.tml
html xmlns:t=http://tapestry.apache.org/schema/tapestry_5_0_0.xsd;
body
form t:type=Form t:id=addForm
t:checkbox t:id=addPosition t:mixins=triggerfragment
fragment=addPositionFragment/
Hi,
I'm breaking my head on this one.
I have 2 nested loops where the value of the outer loop is used as the
source of the inner loop.
The problem is that getCurPhotoAsThumb() is never called (as noticed by
debugging) thus nothing is rendered.
I've made sure that getCurThumbSublist() has at
This is currently listed on the TODO list:
http://www.localhost.nu/java/tapestry5-acegi/todo.html
-Original Message-
From: Jacob Bergoo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 11:04 AM
To: users@tapestry.apache.org
Subject: Re: T5: Problems with Tapestry5-Acegi
That should work just fine. Nothing jumps out at me as being wrong.
In fact, I just tried a simplified test case and it worked fine:
public Object[][] getData() {
return new Object[][] {
{ fred, flintstone },
{ barney, rubble }
};
}
I have a page which used to have a zone component in use. I have now
removed the zone component in favor of another approach. However, when I
hit that page, I get a Javascript error in tapestry.js (the following from
Firebug):
$(zoneDiv) has no properties
--
Bill @ PeoplePad
I suspect you still have a TriggerFragment mixin on a link and it's
trying to initialize that relationship.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Bill Holloway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a page which used to have a zone component in use. I have now
removed the zone component in favor of
I didn't use a triggerfragment. Perhaps I should!
Related: The reason I used a zone was because the
t5components.Editorwasn't showing up in the block that replaced my
zone's initial contents.
The usual Tapestry components showed up fine in the replacement block.
Bill
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at
Well, no, actually. TriggerFragment isn't needed. I'm trying to replace
simple output of some fields with a form that edits those fields (with one
of them using a t5components.editor field). There's not a fragment like the
Tapestry shipping/billing address example for FormFragment.
Bill
On
I found a workaround. It seems tapestry is not linking the checkbox
event with the hidden field in this case
addPositionFragment:hidden
This value of this hidden field is used on the server side to determine
if binding of the fragment fields should happen. If I manually add a
onchange event
I recently posted e-mail to this list on this exact same topic. Here
is that post:
Per documentation, FormFragment decides if its content should be
submitted based on the hidden field [formfragmentname]:hidden:
// this is the relevant code from FormFragment source: void beginRender(..)
Hi
Where are the validation results of the BeanEdit persisted in T5?
I disabled javascript then submited empty form, then enabled
javascript and opened empty form without any sumbit, but errors are
still there. Only when I dropped the cookie error
messages went away.
--
Best regards,
Renat
Thanks for the example Steve. My only issue is that I don't seem to be
getting a dojo-ajax-request header in the request. There is a
dojoRequest parameter, which seems like I can use it for the same
purpose. Are you using a version of Tapestry greater than 4.02?
I'm going to try to adopt
I believe they are persisted in the session by the form in it's
validation tracker.
I'm not 100% sure that this is the best approach, but I have used:
void cleanupRender() {
_myForm.clearErrors();
}
to make sure old errors don't stick around.
Josh
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:22
I'm using 4.1.5 and I think I wrote that code against 4.1.3. I agree
that you shouldn't move your auth code into a filter - I only mentioned
that to explain why I wasn't handing you the whole filter code. You may
have to tweak the generated code a bit for 4.0.2. I just used firebug
to grab
Tapestry 4.0.x with tacos probably doesn't add the request header...
just the parameter. So, what you're seeing is consistent, and if
you want to plan ahead, check for the existence of either of those
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Kelly Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the example
In the company I worked for until two weeks ago, I developed an
internal application with T5 and it's already in production. That was
a very successful experience, so the same company is now developing
another one in T5.
There is another public website, thedailytube.com, developed with T5
by some
how about:
@Component
private Form regForm;
void cleanupRender() {
regForm.clearErrors();
}
Renat Zubairov wrote:
Hi
Where are the validation results of the BeanEdit persisted in T5?
I disabled javascript then submited empty form, then enabled
javascript and opened empty
Subtle logic error.
outputlist.add(list.subList(counter,
Math.min(counter+maxListsize,outputlist.size(;
Should be
outputlist.add(list.subList(counter,
Math.min(counter+maxListsize, list.size(;
Gotta love those!
-Original Message-
From: Britske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I have a form which is handled via an async listener, which currently
just does some component updates:
ResponseBuilder builder = getRequestCycle().getResponseBuilder();
builder.updateComponent(dataPanes);
builder.updateComponent(filterSubmit);
But now I need to be able to execute
Great catch. Simpler is always better.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Jonathan Barker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subtle logic error.
outputlist.add(list.subList(counter,
Math.min(counter+maxListsize,outputlist.size(;
Should be
outputlist.add(list.subList(counter,
Can't you conditionally include a @Script in the response?
Also, that's on 4.1.5, right?
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Paul Stanton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a form which is handled via an async listener, which currently
just does some component updates:
ResponseBuilder
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1643
So, any hope on this issue?
Or at least I don't get how mixin parameters can be set when you use the
@Mixin annotation?
Does it look at parameters of the containing component, or just getters?
But what if I don't want to expose those
There is another public website, thedailytube.com, developed with T5
by some member of this list I can't recall his name. :P
That'd be me :)
The site went up with 5.0.5, and currently on 5.0.10.
Tapestry 5 is rendering everything, the site, the RSS feeds, the
content for the email newsletters
Fun is one of my favorite adjectives for Tapestry.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Josh Canfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is another public website, thedailytube.com, developed with T5
by some member of this list I can't recall his name. :P
That'd be me :)
The site went up with
Sorry if progress seems short; I'm sidetracked on a client project,
and working on new slide decks for upcoming NFJS shows.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Fernando Padilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1643
So, any hope on this issue?
Or at least
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
i just updated my t5 app from an early 5.0.11 Snapshot to the finally
release version. Unfortunatly i experienced some problems. One of the
app pages is using the beaneditor component to display and edit
different data beans. Different
no problem :)
I was just getting confused on how parameters work for mixins when they
are declared inside of a component through the @Mixin annotation. The
documentation explicitly shows how that works for components/mixins in
the template.
Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
Sorry if progress seems
I think what's happened is that there's a subtle change in the order
of operations inside BeanEditForm and BeanEditor.
They now build the BeanModel from the bound property type ... in this
case, your abstract bean.
I think youre best bet is to inject the BeanModelSource service, and
obtain the
Thanks guys. Server-side validation is a must. Whatever makes it easy is
doing the right thing.
However, I'm disappointed to find a flaw. I was able to manually edit the
selection values in the html and submit without a problem. I'd expect
Tapestry to enforce the selection to be only the
When the userSearchForm of the code below is submitted I am getting the
following exception
A component event handler method returned the value
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Return type
org.apache.internal.structure.BlockImpl can not be handled. Configured
return types are java.lang.Class, java.lang.String,
52 matches
Mail list logo
