Chris,
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 2:20 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> On 2/2/18 1:47 PM, Pawel Veselov wrote:
>>> On 2/1/18 6:08 PM, Pawel Veselov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Mark Thomas
wrote:
> On 01/02/18 20:57, Pawel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Pawel,
On 2/2/18 1:47 PM, Pawel Veselov wrote:
>> On 2/1/18 6:08 PM, Pawel Veselov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Mark Thomas
>>> wrote:
On 01/02/18 20:57, Pawel Veselov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> It looks
> On 2/1/18 6:08 PM, Pawel Veselov wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Mark Thomas
>> wrote:
>>> On 01/02/18 20:57, Pawel Veselov wrote:
Hello.
It looks like in tomcat 8 (looking at master's HEAD), the
minIdle support is broken. According to docs,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Carlo,
On 2/2/18 8:24 AM, Luib-Finetti, Carlo wrote:
> Under Windows 10, my local development Tomcat Version 8.5.11
> reports a lot of warnings about not stopped threads. For example: "
> The web application [webdms-jadice] appears to have started
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 2/2/18 5:35 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 02/02/18 04:06, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>
>
>
>> It seems reasonable for Tomcat to verify that any "critical"
>> key-use extensions are respected, and perhaps even some
>> non-critical ones.
>
Any takers to tackle this issue?
-Original Message-
From: Serge Perepel [mailto:se...@american-data.com]
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 2:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Suspected memory leak of
org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$ConnectionHandler object while using
Websocket
Under Windows 10, my local development Tomcat Version 8.5.11 reports a lot
of warnings about not stopped threads. For example: " The web application
[webdms-jadice]
appears to have started a thread named [pool-1-thread-1-Logging Task
Scheduler] but has failed to stop it."
Our application support
Hi Chris,
On 2 February 2018 at 09:36, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Indunil,
>
> On 2/1/18 7:33 AM, Indunil Rathnayake wrote:
> > I have configured a tomcat connector for handling requests for a
> >
On 02/02/18 04:06, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> It seems reasonable for Tomcat to verify that any "critical" key-use
> extensions are respected, and perhaps even some non-critical ones.
I'd assume that JSSE / OpenSSl do this automatically. Is there any
evidence that they do not?
Mark