Christopher Schultz wrote:
You'd be amazed how fast a
reproducable bug can be fixed ;)
Particularly if it can also be repeated or duplicated.
;-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
Thanks folks, I submitted the issue as a bug:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49779
Hans
2010/8/19 Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid/Hans,
On 8/16/2010 5:53 AM, Pid wrote:
On 16/08/2010 09:52, Hans Wahn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid/Hans,
On 8/16/2010 5:53 AM, Pid wrote:
On 16/08/2010 09:52, Hans Wahn wrote:
I'd like to provide more information. Any suggestions what is the best
way to accomplish that?
See above, regarding trace log.
Also, providing a stack trace if
I'd like to provide more information. Any suggestions what is the best
way to accomplish that?
Hans
2010/8/16 Pid p...@pidster.com:
On 13/08/2010 23:24, André Warnier wrote:
Pid wrote:
On 13/08/2010 11:52, Hans Wahn wrote:
2010/08/12 20:20:17:796 CEST [DEBUG] wire - HTTP/1.1 100
On 16/08/2010 09:52, Hans Wahn wrote:
I'd like to provide more information. Any suggestions what is the best
way to accomplish that?
Hans
2010/8/16 Pid p...@pidster.com:
On 13/08/2010 23:24, André Warnier wrote:
Pid wrote:
On 13/08/2010 11:52, Hans Wahn wrote:
2010/08/12 20:20:17:796
On 13/08/2010 23:24, André Warnier wrote:
Pid wrote:
On 13/08/2010 11:52, Hans Wahn wrote:
2010/08/12 20:20:17:796 CEST [DEBUG] wire - HTTP/1.1 100
Continue[EOL]
2010/08/12 20:20:17:796 CEST [DEBUG] wire - [EOL]
2010/08/12 20:20:17:796 CEST [DEBUG] headers - HTTP/1.1 100 Continue
Hello Tomcat-Users,
I'm facing a strange issue when using HttpComponents with successive
POST requests against a simple Tomcat 7 servlet (Form-based POST
Authentication is enabled). After a sucessfull authentication, the
client requests the same protected resource a few times in a row, but
the
On 13/08/2010 10:07, Hans Wahn wrote:
Hello Tomcat-Users,
I'm facing a strange issue when using HttpComponents with successive
POST requests against a simple Tomcat 7 servlet (Form-based POST
Authentication is enabled). After a sucessfull authentication, the
client requests the same
Thanks for looking into this issue.
What is the exact header body of the 302 redirect from Tomcat in #2?
2010/08/12 20:20:17:750 CEST [DEBUG] wire - HTTP/1.1 302 Moved
Temporarily[EOL]
2010/08/12 20:20:17:750 CEST [DEBUG] wire - Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1[EOL]
2010/08/12 20:20:17:750 CEST
On 13/08/2010 11:52, Hans Wahn wrote:
Thanks for looking into this issue.
What is the exact header body of the 302 redirect from Tomcat in #2?
2010/08/12 20:20:17:750 CEST [DEBUG] wire - HTTP/1.1 302 Moved
Temporarily[EOL]
2010/08/12 20:20:17:750 CEST [DEBUG] wire - Server:
For the below, isn't there an alternative method of configuring the
client to automatically follow redirects?
I asked the same question and Oleg Kalniche (HTTPComponents developer) replied:
There are several cases when automatic redirections is prohibited by the
HTTP specification. You can
Hans Wahn wrote:
For the below, isn't there an alternative method of configuring the
client to automatically follow redirects?
I asked the same question and Oleg Kalniche (HTTPComponents developer) replied:
There are several cases when automatic redirections is prohibited by the
HTTP
Thanks for your friendly words and explanations.
Due to your thought the POST data of the first request may get
processed too late and mixup things, I altered the client source, so
the user credentials are only send after the inital call (on the
second request). Also the POST test data
Hans Wahn wrote:
Thanks for your friendly words and explanations.
Due to your thought the POST data of the first request may get
processed too late and mixup things, I altered the client source, so
the user credentials are only send after the inital call (on the
second request).
No, what I
On 13/08/2010 11:52, Hans Wahn wrote:
2010/08/12 20:20:17:796 CEST [DEBUG] wire - HTTP/1.1 100 Continue[EOL]
2010/08/12 20:20:17:796 CEST [DEBUG] wire - [EOL]
2010/08/12 20:20:17:796 CEST [DEBUG] headers - HTTP/1.1 100 Continue
2010/08/12 20:20:17:796 CEST [DEBUG] wire - testName=testValue
Pid wrote:
On 13/08/2010 11:52, Hans Wahn wrote:
2010/08/12 20:20:17:796 CEST [DEBUG] wire - HTTP/1.1 100 Continue[EOL]
2010/08/12 20:20:17:796 CEST [DEBUG] wire - [EOL]
2010/08/12 20:20:17:796 CEST [DEBUG] headers - HTTP/1.1 100 Continue
2010/08/12 20:20:17:796 CEST [DEBUG] wire -
16 matches
Mail list logo