Mieke Banderas wrote:
Mike Sabroff suggested:
Cloudscape
is it faster than Apache Derby in your experience?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The
Mike Sabroff suggested:
Cloudscape
is it faster than Apache Derby in your experience?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday, 29 בNovember 2005 03:21, Mieke Banderas wrote:
Oded Arbel said:
b) Even assuming they are right, you still want to choose MySQL over
JVM space databases, because Java and Java databases are very much
thread enabled and create and destroy many threads.
But do they do it mainly
On Tuesday, 29 בNovember 2005 05:12, Mieke Banderas wrote:
I wonder how much faster Linux could run on my G3 server hardware. I
would have lots of work replacing all the built in services in Mac OS
X Server to give me all that control also in Linux, buy maybe I have
to. I'm a bit cashstrapped
From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X
Server? (OT)
inter-thread communication in java is done through shared
memory - shared variables, but the Java memory sharing model
doesn't really share memory, Instead it uses thread
On Tuesday, 29 בNovember 2005 17:28, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X
Server? (OT)
inter-thread communication in java is done through shared
memory - shared variables, but the Java memory
From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X
Server? (OT)
Please read up on your Java memory model. What you describe
is a nice abstraction that many Java developers have in their
mind, but is technically not correct and can't be
Given the sad, sad performance findings at:
No More Apple Mysteries, Part Two
Date: September 1st, 2005
http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2520
are there any javabased DB alternatives, that may perform better than
MySQL (or PostgreSQL for that matter)? I prefer free, open sourced DBs or
On Monday, 28 בNovember 2005 19:59, Mieke Banderas wrote:
are there any javabased DB alternatives, that may perform better than
MySQL (or PostgreSQL for that matter)? I prefer free, open sourced
DBs or otherwise with a license that could fit a small business/non
profit organisation.
HSQLdb
On Monday, 28 בNovember 2005 19:59, Mieke Banderas wrote:
Given the sad, sad performance findings at:
No More Apple Mysteries, Part Two
Date: September 1st, 2005
http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2520
I don't enough of JVMs to know if Javabased DBs are usually better
Oded Arbel said:
b) Even assuming they are right, you still want to choose MySQL over JVM
space databases, because Java and Java databases are very much thread
enabled and create and destroy many threads.
But do they do it mainly within the OS or within the JVM? Top or PS
doesn't show
Mieke Banderas said:
I'd like to know
where/how exactly Java threads are started/killed on Hotspot in OS X.
Doesn't java threads mainly intercommunicate within the JVM? Context
switches?
Is it really a completely dead end that minimizing the OS threading in
Mac OS X and keeping threads within
From: Mieke Banderas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X
Server? (OT)
It would seem so, as I now learnt that The HotSpot JVM
uses native threads. The only possible escape then would
be to use another JVM that doesn't on OS X. But I'm
13 matches
Mail list logo
