-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter,
On 2/17/2009 5:08 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
IMHO, you either have control of your production environment
yourself (and can do whatever you want) or you have an ops team
with
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
IMHO, you either
have control of your production environment yourself (and can do
whatever you want) or you have an ops team with complete
control of your
production environment (and they ought to be able to handle
scary stuff
Just in case it was missed in the subsequent conflagration (and I always
marvel at how easy it is to start a conflagration by saying something
like language X is better than language Y), I would just like to state
that my blurb was meant to be taken lightly, with ;-) and so on.
Comparing
From: Ken Bowen [mailto:kbo...@als.com]
The only thing more fiery than language X is better than language Y
is editor Z is better than editor W :-)
To skip a few levels in the inevitable impending debate...
Well I edited the inodes by hand. With magnets.
(http://www.userfriendly.org)
The only thing more fiery than language X is better than language Y
is editor Z is better than editor W :-)
On Feb 17, 2009, at 9:45 AM, André Warnier wrote:
language X is better than language Y
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 2/12/2009 10:27 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] of the different methods to get a user-id
I don't understand that, either. I suppose this works
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
What the hell.. let's start a holy war?!
On 2/13/2009 10:25 AM, André Warnier wrote:
Their merit is all the greater since
they work in the obscure non-graphical background, they never get any of
the attention, and they have to share
Chris,
I offer my opinions here as a real grey beard (literally). I certainly
agree with you that people should have
a breath of skills allowing them to use the right tool at the right time.
However, notwithstanding the fact that the other day I worked out that I
have actually used about 15
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] of the different methods to get a user-id
For instance.
i = i++
yields different results depending on what language
you are using. C and Java produce different outputs
(which really surprised me!).
Java
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 2/16/2009 5:19 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] of the different methods to get a user-id
For instance.
i = i++
yields different results depending on
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] of the different methods to get a user-id
Do you mean gcc on win32 worked as you expected?
Yes, it produced the same results as Java.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] of the different methods to get a user-id
I don't understand that, either. I suppose this works differently in
different languages, though:
return i++;
return (i++);
Not any that
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
I was going to let that one pass, but now I'm provoked.
The expressions above do work differently in Perl.
[...]
However, the calle sub can be cleverer and anticipate this, by doing :
return wantarray ? (i++) : i++;
thus checking in which context
From: Peter Crowther [mailto:peter.crowt...@melandra.com]
Subject: RE: [OT] of the different methods to get a user-id
Thank you. Although I don't need any further reasons to
avoid that camel of a language whenever I can, it's always
nice to find another really good reason to avoid it...
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Hear, hear! In a past life, a guy I know actually wrote a
suite of production programs in APL - which was even more
cryptic (but also more logical) than Perl.
Dedication indeed! Did he need the custom golfball for the teletype
Peter Crowther wrote:
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Hear, hear! In a past life, a guy I know actually wrote a
suite of production programs in APL - which was even more
cryptic (but also more logical) than Perl.
Dedication indeed! Did he need the custom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 2/12/2009 1:22 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
As Pid surmised, it's not Tomcat that is giving you different
answers.
Here's Tomcat's implementation of HttpServletRequest.getRemoteUser():
public String getRemoteUser() {
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] of the different methods to get a user-id
I don't understand that, either. I suppose this works differently in
different languages, though:
return i++;
return (i++);
Not any that I'm aware of; the value of
18 matches
Mail list logo
