isn't that because the permission object picks all of that up as one item, and
overrides your separate setting?
I would think it would. Wouldn't you need to create an entire new object or not
for that to work?
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Daly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
I'm not following what you're suggesting.
--
Propes, Barry L wrote:
isn't that because the permission object picks all of that up as one item,
and overrides your separate setting?
I would think it would. Wouldn't you need to create an entire new object or
not for that to work?
java.vm.vendor, read;
permission java.util.PropertyPermission java.vm.name, read;
Which version are you using?
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Daly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 2:43 PM
To: Propes, Barry L
Subject: Re: java.util.PropertyPermission
Well, I
users@tomcat.apache.org
Cc: Propes, Barry L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: java.util.PropertyPermission
I'm not following what you're suggesting.
--
Propes, Barry L wrote:
isn't that because the permission object picks all of that up as one item
. Thank you.
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Cc: Propes, Barry L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: java.util.PropertyPermission
I'm not following what you're suggesting
]
To: Martin Gainty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: java.util.PropertyPermission
Sure. I have the following in my policy file:
// == DHS ==
grant codeBase file:/usr/local/apache/vhosts/www
