On 08/04/2013 15:32, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chuck,
On 4/8/13 8:30 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Anton Piatek1 [mailto:anton.pia...@uk.ibm.com] Subject: Re:
websockets holding on to threads.
My thinking about it being a bug
Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com wrote on 05/04/2013
21:22:33:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Anton Piatek1
anton.pia...@uk.ibm.comwrote:
I am seeing what at first appears to be a bug, but given the lack of
other
reports I can't believe I am the only person seeing this, so
From: Anton Piatek1 [mailto:anton.pia...@uk.ibm.com]
Subject: Re: websockets holding on to threads.
My thinking about it being a bug is that to support N clients with
websockets, you need N threads available on tomcat, even though they are
only getting updates every x seconds.
I don't
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Anton Piatek1 anton.pia...@uk.ibm.comwrote:
Multiple tabs/windows is one thing, but multiple clients are just as big a
problem.
Not a problem or a concern in my web app. Endusers are trained to use the
web app in 'one' browser tab/window 'per device'; every
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Caldarale, Charles R
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com wrote:
From: Anton Piatek1 [mailto:anton.pia...@uk.ibm.com]
Subject: Re: websockets holding on to threads.
My thinking about it being a bug is that to support N clients with
websockets, you need N threads
Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com wrote on 08/04/2013
13:30:00:
From: Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com
From: Anton Piatek1 [mailto:anton.pia...@uk.ibm.com]
My thinking about it being a bug is that to support N clients with
websockets, you need N threads
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chuck,
On 4/8/13 8:30 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Anton Piatek1 [mailto:anton.pia...@uk.ibm.com] Subject: Re:
websockets holding on to threads.
My thinking about it being a bug is that to support N clients
with websockets, you need
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Anton Piatek1 anton.pia...@uk.ibm.comwrote:
I am seeing what at first appears to be a bug, but given the lack of other
reports I can't believe I am the only person seeing this, so maybe it is
user-error.
I have tomcat (was 7.0.30, but I just tried with 7.0.39)