In OSX you must use ipfw, i don't know how ipfw is used, but i think this
must be similar to iptables.
On 8/15/07, Stephen Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
Do you know what the corresponding command (iptables) would be in OS X?
You can execute tihs iptables line (if you are using
You can execute tihs iptables line (if you are using linux) directly in the
server where you run tomcat (substitute xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx whith the ip address
of your linux box):
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -p tcp -m tcp --dport 443
-j DNAT --to-destination xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8443
Chris,
Thank you for the suggestion. I will investigate.
Stephen
Tomcat does not require you to run it as root in order to use port
443.
There are various techniques, including using a web server such as
Apache httpd to front Tomcat, iptables (or similar) tricks to re-route
ports, or
Hassan,
I appreciate the link.
Stephen
Nope; see the reference to jsvc here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/setup.html
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Matthew,
Thank you for your response. Apart from using iptables (which may or
may not work in OS X), the Tomcat setup link, http://
tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/setup.html, seems to be the best
way to go.
the only way to get rid of the port number is to have something
listening on
no worries. I didn't know about jsvc or commons-daemon before (I do
now!), so I learnt something too! best of luck with your app.
* Matthew Kerle
* * IT Consultant *
* Canberra, Australia*
Mobile: +61404 096 863
Email: Matthew Kerle mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: Matthew Kerle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen,
Stephen Caine wrote:
Is there a way to remove the port number from a https request where the
original url looks something like this:
https://host_name:8443/
If the URL does not contain the port number, then the web browser will
fail to
On 8/14/07, Stephen Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to remove the port number from a https request where
the original url looks something like this:
https://host_name:8443/
The approach to change the server.xml file (where the connector port
is changed from 8443 to 443) is not
the only way to get rid of the port number is to have something
listening on :443 (that's the way browsers are, sorry), and then hand
requests over to tomcat, so to get what you want something will have to
bind to :443 at some point, requiring root privs. What you want is
something that will
oops, sorry I meant mod_proxy, not mod_rewrite...
--
* Matthew Kerle
** IT Consultant* **
* Canberra, Australia*
Mobile: +61404 096 863
Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew Kerle
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: Matthew Kerle http://threebrightlights.blogspot.com/
Matthew Kerle
From: Matthew Kerle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Removing the port identifier
the Apache web server is excellent for this kind of thing.
There are much better ways to run Tomcat on low ports than adding the
path length of another web server; several messages have already pointed
: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew Kerle
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: Matthew Kerle http://threebrightlights.blogspot.com/
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Matthew Kerle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Removing the port identifier
the Apache web server is excellent for this kind
From: Matthew Kerle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Removing the port identifier
If the application has a lot of static content then it makes good
performance sense to put something in front of it, either apache or
squid. but that's probably not an issue in this case...;-p
13 matches
Mail list logo
