Changing Tomcat's SSL ciphers

2015-03-02 Thread Eric
I am trying to change the ciphers that my Tomcat 7 server supports. I am using the APR connector. Here's the connector information in server.xml with the line saying which ciphers to support: Connector port=8443 executor=edgeExecutor maxHttpHeaderSize=32768 enableLookups=false

Re: Changing Tomcat's SSL ciphers

2015-03-02 Thread Eric
Thank you for catching my typo and for the information On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-03-03 1:45 GMT+03:00 Eric cam...@gmail.com: I am trying to change the ciphers that my Tomcat 7 server supports. I am using the APR connector. Here's

Re: Changing Tomcat's SSL ciphers

2015-03-02 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2015-03-03 1:45 GMT+03:00 Eric cam...@gmail.com: I am trying to change the ciphers that my Tomcat 7 server supports. I am using the APR connector. Here's the connector information in server.xml with the line saying which ciphers to support: Connector port=8443 executor=edgeExecutor

Re: 答复: Tomcat 6.0.37 EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION Crash

2015-03-02 Thread Mark Thomas
On 02/03/2015 09:21, Yuanxianhu (Tiger, Secospace) wrote: My friend, Can you give me the bug ID for JVM? To repeat what I said previously. We can't help. You'll have to speak yo your JVM vendor. Mark Best Regards -邮件原件- 发件人: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]

Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-02 Thread Rajesh Cherukuri
for telnet immediateconnection refused is given telnet 10.xxx.xxx.xx 8911 Trying 10.xx.xx.x... telnet: connect to address 10.xx.x.xx: Connection refused here is the error log for the specifed time [Fri Feb 27 02:26:14.463 2015] [31713:140059770595072] [error]

Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-02 Thread Rainer Jung
Please don't top post, it makes following the communication very hard. Am 02.03.2015 um 12:48 schrieb Rajesh Cherukuri: for telnet immediateconnection refused is given telnet 10.xxx.xxx.xx 8911 Trying 10.xx.xx.x... telnet: connect to address 10.xx.x.xx: Connection refused Then I

Re: Fwd: File upload fails after upgrade to 7.0.59

2015-03-02 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 02.03.2015 um 09:34 schrieb Umesh Sehgal: Hi, We recently upgraded our application's tomcat from 7.0.30 to 7.0.59. After upgrade the file upload feature has broken. I have been able to nail it down to the point that the problem manifests 7.0.50 onwards. Here is the exception that I see

Re: Fwd: File upload fails after upgrade to 7.0.59

2015-03-02 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 02.03.2015 um 13:34 schrieb Umesh Sehgal: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Umesh Sehgal umesh.seh...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: Am 02.03.2015 um 11:02 schrieb Umesh Sehgal: Thanks for the quick reply, I tried using the

Re: Tomcat 6.0.37 EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION Crash

2015-03-02 Thread Mark Thomas
On 02/03/2015 07:47, Yuanxianhu (Tiger, Secospace) wrote: Dear: I use Tomcat NIO to deal with web request, but tomcat crashed frequently because of NIO EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION. Attachments are crash logs. I need you help how to analyze this problem. We can't

Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-02 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 02.03.2015 um 10:45 schrieb Rajesh Cherukuri: here is what i can see in modJk log file , we have stopped tomcat 11 a week back , 172.x [27/Feb/2015:*02:28:14* +] GET /xx/deal-finder HTTP/1.1200 15172 20 *lb* tomcat--11** 0 26712 12118 **tomcat-03** 0 820679 4

Re: Fwd: File upload fails after upgrade to 7.0.59

2015-03-02 Thread Umesh Sehgal
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: Am 02.03.2015 um 11:02 schrieb Umesh Sehgal: Thanks for the quick reply, I tried using the maxSwallowSize with increased value but to no effect. The max size that I have been able to upload is ~16 KB. I also see

Re: Fwd: File upload fails after upgrade to 7.0.59

2015-03-02 Thread Umesh Sehgal
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Umesh Sehgal umesh.seh...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: Am 02.03.2015 um 11:02 schrieb Umesh Sehgal: Thanks for the quick reply, I tried using the maxSwallowSize with increased value but to no

答复: Tomcat 6.0.37 EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION Crash

2015-03-02 Thread Yuanxianhu (Tiger, Secospace)
My friend, Can you give me the bug ID for JVM? Best Regards -邮件原件- 发件人: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] 发送时间: 星期一 2015年3月2日 17:20 收件人: Tomcat Users List 主题: Re: Tomcat 6.0.37 EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION Crash On 02/03/2015 07:47, Yuanxianhu (Tiger, Secospace) wrote:

Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-02 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 02.03.2015 um 11:34 schrieb Rajesh Cherukuri: rainer looks like what you said is correct , but not sure why the Mod_jk has to wait for 10 seconds when the backend tomcat servers is down Because your network layer behaves like that. It simply hangs for (more than) 10 seconds. You should be

Fwd: File upload fails after upgrade to 7.0.59

2015-03-02 Thread Umesh Sehgal
Hi, We recently upgraded our application's tomcat from 7.0.30 to 7.0.59. After upgrade the file upload feature has broken. I have been able to nail it down to the point that the problem manifests 7.0.50 onwards. Here is the exception that I see inside logs: Caused by: java.net.SocketException:

Re: Fwd: File upload fails after upgrade to 7.0.59

2015-03-02 Thread Umesh Sehgal
Thanks for the quick reply, I tried using the maxSwallowSize with increased value but to no effect. The max size that I have been able to upload is ~16 KB. I also see that the maxSwallowSize got introduced with update 55 but the behavior I'm seeing is 50 update onwards, is there any other param

Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-02 Thread Rajesh Cherukuri
rainer looks like what you said is correct , but not sure why the Mod_jk has to wait for 10 seconds when the backend tomcat servers is down here is the error log i don't see that any place where it is aitng for 20 sec error log [Thu Feb 26 01:28:35.432 2015] [19535:140214433396480] [error]

Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-02 Thread Rajesh Cherukuri
here is what i can see in modJk log file , we have stopped tomcat 11 a week back , 172.x [27/Feb/2015:*02:28:14* +] GET /xx/deal-finder HTTP/1.1200 15172 20 *lb* tomcat--11** 0 26712 12118 **tomcat-03** 0 820679 4 *20.352845* – worker configuration *here is my

Re: Fwd: File upload fails after upgrade to 7.0.59

2015-03-02 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 02.03.2015 um 11:02 schrieb Umesh Sehgal: Thanks for the quick reply, I tried using the maxSwallowSize with increased value but to no effect. The max size that I have been able to upload is ~16 KB. I also see that the maxSwallowSize got introduced with update 55 but the behavior I'm seeing is

Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-02 Thread Rajesh Cherukuri
Yes it is always 20 sec always the case when the MOD_jk assigns the request to the tomcat that was down using Mod_jk 1.2.37 version On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: Please don't top post, it makes following the communication very hard. Am 02.03.2015

Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-02 Thread Frederik Nosi
Please dont top post. On 03/02/2015 04:07 PM, Rajesh Cherukuri wrote: Yes it is always 20 sec always the case when the MOD_jk assigns the request to the tomcat that was down Are you sure that there's not some other tomcat in the same load balanced worker that's in hang? Didnt had time to

Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-02 Thread André Warnier
For an explanation of what we mean by please do not top post, see here : http://www.idallen.com/topposting.html Got it ? Rajesh Cherukuri wrote: Yes it is always 20 sec always the case when the MOD_jk assigns the request to the tomcat that was down using Mod_jk 1.2.37 version On Mon, Mar 2,