Re: Tomcat 7.0.28 ignoring context copyXML attribute and web-fragments

2015-09-28 Thread Fernando González
Upgrading the package solves these issues, but other appear: the xml file not being actually copied. "dpkg -s tomcat7" still returns 7.0.28. So it is quite probably not correct anymore. Now we know that manual installation is the way to go, thanks! On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Fernando

Re: Need help understanding support for Unix Domain Sockets in Tomcat 7.0.x

2015-09-28 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Frederik, On 9/28/15 11:13 AM, Frederik Nosi wrote: > Hi, On 09/26/2015 02:04 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: Graham, > > On 9/25/15 7:23 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: On 25 Sep 2015, at 10:33 PM, Christopher Schultz

Re: Need help understanding support for Unix Domain Sockets in Tomcat 7.0.x

2015-09-28 Thread Frederik Nosi
Hi, On 09/26/2015 02:04 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Graham, On 9/25/15 7:23 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: On 25 Sep 2015, at 10:33 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: While I obviously agree with the sentiment, I do

Re: Parallel Deployment: Can I request a specific webapp version?

2015-09-28 Thread Ludovic Pénet
>> You have competing requirements: >> >> 1. All servers are the same >> >2. Some subset users get a different version of the application >> > >All servers would have all versions of the app, thats the whole point >:) >I.e. >Instead of >Server 1 - 3: App Version 001 >Server 4 - 6: App Version

Re: Tomcat 7.0.28 ignoring context copyXML attribute and web-fragments

2015-09-28 Thread Fernando González
Yeah, normally I install "real Tomcat" but this server is not under my control. I'll try to update the Debian package and/or to a manually installed one and report back if the issues are gone. Many many thanks for the hint! On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Caldarale, Charles R <

Re: Parallel Deployment: Can I request a specific webapp version?

2015-09-28 Thread Linus Brimstedt
Hello, On 27 September 2015 at 23:55, Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > > You have competing requirements: > > 1. All servers are the same > 2. Some subset users get a different version of the application > All servers would have all versions of the app, thats the

Re: NIO2 SSL Handshake usage

2015-09-28 Thread Mark Thomas
On 28/09/2015 11:50, kamalakannan chandrakumar wrote: > I'm not talking about Handler classes in SecureNIOChannel. > It is for SecureNIO2Channel. Those are internal Tomcat classes. They are not designed for re-use outside of Tomcat. Mark > > Regards, > Kamal. > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at

Re: NIO2 SSL Handshake usage

2015-09-28 Thread Mark Thomas
On 28/09/2015 11:50, kamalakannan chandrakumar wrote: > I'm not talking about Handler classes in SecureNIOChannel. > It is for SecureNIO2Channel. Those are internal Tomcat classes. They are not designed for re-use outside of Tomcat. Mark > > Regards, > Kamal. > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at

Re: NIO2 SSL Handshake usage

2015-09-28 Thread kamalakannan chandrakumar
Thanks ! If it is not for external purpose, pl let me know which API should I look to use NIO2 SSL implementation. This is for testing java client code to communicate with server. Regards, Kamal. On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 28/09/2015 12:16,

Re: NIO2 SSL Handshake usage

2015-09-28 Thread kamalakannan chandrakumar
Mark, Thanks! Just curious to know how it is used internally for NIO2. I understand that it is internal, but please let me know the details. Regards, Kamal. On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 28/09/2015 11:50, kamalakannan chandrakumar wrote: > > I'm

Re: NIO2 SSL Handshake usage

2015-09-28 Thread Mark Thomas
On 28/09/2015 12:16, kamalakannan chandrakumar wrote: > Mark, > > Thanks! Just curious to know how it is used internally for NIO2. > I understand that it is internal, but please let me know the details. Try reading the source code. There is no API to set the completion handler because that is

Re: NIO2 SSL Handshake usage

2015-09-28 Thread Rémy Maucherat
2015-09-28 12:17 GMT+02:00 kamalakannan chandrakumar < chandrakumarkamalakan...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > > > > Please let me why there is no way to set Handler class or Future task is > > not returned for > > SSL handshake in SecureNIO2Channel. How to use those classes for writing > > client code ?

Re: NIO2 SSL Handshake usage

2015-09-28 Thread kamalakannan chandrakumar
I'm not talking about Handler classes in SecureNIOChannel. It is for SecureNIO2Channel. Regards, Kamal. On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > 2015-09-28 12:17 GMT+02:00 kamalakannan chandrakumar < > chandrakumarkamalakan...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi, > > > > > >

Re: NIO2 SSL Handshake usage

2015-09-28 Thread kamalakannan chandrakumar
Hi, > > Please let me why there is no way to set Handler class or Future task is > not returned for > SSL handshake in SecureNIO2Channel. How to use those classes for writing > client code ? > This was working fine with NIO code (SecureNIOChannel). > > Regards, > Kamal. > > > > > >

Re: Parallel Deployment: Can I request a specific webapp version?

2015-09-28 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Linus, On 9/28/15 2:37 AM, Linus Brimstedt wrote: > On 27 September 2015 at 23:55, Christopher Schultz < > ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > >> >> You have competing requirements: >> >> 1. All servers are the same >> > 2. Some subset

Re: NIO2 SSL Handshake usage

2015-09-28 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Kamal, On 9/28/15 7:47 AM, kamalakannan chandrakumar wrote: > Thanks ! If it is not for external purpose, pl let me know which > API should I look to use NIO2 SSL implementation. This is for > testing java client code to communicate with server.

Re: Need help understanding support for Unix Domain Sockets in Tomcat 7.0.x

2015-09-28 Thread tomcat
On 28.09.2015 18:09, Christopher Schultz wrote: ... Not sure on this, as AJP is quite handy. Expecialy load balancing java webapps and i find mod_jk quite good at this. Remember, it's not mod_jk doing the load-balancing, it's Apache httpd. mod_jk is simply providing the channel over which