Martin,
On 7/3/23 04:47, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
On 6/29/23 17:06, Rainer Jung wrote:
Since I try to push people into mod_proxy, I am hesitant to implement
more and more features which keep people from switching ;)
Hi Rainer,
so, what do you suggest for the mod_jk retirement?
Jon,
On 6/30/23 17:21, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote:
Hi Chris and Rainer,
Just want to add my .02 worth. Having the ability to "Drain" hosts in a Proxy
configuration would be an awesome boon so you could gracefully take down a "node" for
maintenance, or even just a restart.
On 6/29/23 17:06, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> > Since I try to push people into mod_proxy, I am hesitant to implement
> > more and more features which keep people from switching ;)
>
>
Hi Rainer,
so, what do you suggest for the mod_jk retirement?
mod_proxy+mod_proxy_ajp, or just proxy to the HTTPS
Hi Chris and Rainer,
Just want to add my .02 worth. Having the ability to "Drain" hosts in a Proxy
configuration would be an awesome boon so you could gracefully take down a
"node" for maintenance, or even just a restart. Then be able to put it back in
action afterwards. :-) Of course, only in
Rainer,
On 6/29/23 17:06, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Chris,
Am 29.06.23 um 15:00 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
All,
I've been using mod_jk forever and have some tools[1][2] to check on
the status of a worker and change its state using the status worker.
One of the samples I check is the
Hi Chris,
Am 29.06.23 um 15:00 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
All,
I've been using mod_jk forever and have some tools[1][2] to check on the
status of a worker and change its state using the status worker.
One of the samples I check is the "errors" count and if it's above 0
then I report an
All,
I've been using mod_jk forever and have some tools[1][2] to check on the
status of a worker and change its state using the status worker.
One of the samples I check is the "errors" count and if it's above 0
then I report an error to my monitoring system.
The problem is that sometimes
