-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David,
On 5/14/2009 8:34 AM, David kerber wrote:
len = req.getContentLength();
b = new byte[ len ];
Don't forget to check to see if getContentLength() returned zero.
What is the content-type here? Is it application/x-www-form-urlencoded?
Are
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David,
On 5/14/2009 8:34 AM, David kerber wrote:
len = req.getContentLength();
b = new byte[ len ];
Don't forget to check to see if getContentLength() returned zero.
I do, it's just not in that code
From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net]
Subject: Re: Peformance on socket reads
What method would you suggest? Create the byte array long enough to
handle any possible input and then read without specifying the length?
No, keep allocating the byte array based on the content-length
David kerber wrote:
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David,
On 5/14/2009 8:34 AM, David kerber wrote:
len = req.getContentLength();
b = new byte[ len ];
Don't forget to check to see if getContentLength() returned zero.
I do, it's just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David,
On 5/15/2009 2:28 PM, David kerber wrote:
The content-type is application/binary.
I might have used application/octet-stream, but it's really just
semantics.
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment:
This post is a follow-on to my performance with many small requests
thread from a couple days ago.
I have been watching my app, and taking thread dumps when things seem to
be running a bit slower than I would like. Right now, the biggest
bottleneck seems to be on the POST data read. Here is
On 14.05.2009 14:34, David kerber wrote:
This post is a follow-on to my performance with many small requests
thread from a couple days ago.
I have been watching my app, and taking thread dumps when things seem to
be running a bit slower than I would like. Right now, the biggest
bottleneck
