Re: Request for a technical review
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Guido, On 12/13/18 03:33, Jäkel, Guido wrote: > Dear Mallory and Mark, > > then I'm the one of the rare who use an "unusual" setups for more > than 10 years :) . On a staged farm of about 3*10 Tomcat's we run a > whole bunch of "webapps"; most of them in at least two instances > for failover. When Mark says "unusual setup of multiple services", I think he meant "unusual setup of multiple s". There's a big difference in the reading of one versus another. > But I never configured more than one Service and one Engine Right: just like everyone else, a single is sufficient for you . - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAlwUKPEACgkQHPApP6U8 pFjsQxAAiM38DefvgGsl7jDedbl9JN7kPLAsa8S11jpL+IVSZgGcNjLkM1SO1fEY LwuXHkDf+uITqx9gjObzX33MQ8bzgIkfsCwWEKWrQqvDNJ0LiVMn6QC0z8q7LjFb loEywHvJ/fsRAbFdEr6EYgZZFlayU0MtiyjeKFs7sB5BOfbWFzQinCR80Z+Hem0y 3rZiWSOFqAWT/4dfy6AHZEh54Ir5vC/FWQNddh6perXAUopvptIyTTA83+5OnC1/ JQ8CWQnz/7MDO/WeO+28/3hfLr9iN2POMa6V4jZ9Od1XoaHafgWHOrpkM13BzAQI zsJOA3HYJSjoZby+f582qnYsQ05rWBEfjOWJ+64y5dw9pfH9y32xau5CULa3SY34 Vb3kTo71kjirtS3xMxecHpgQnIq3qfKqmbxz2By9IWD6KyhgXBpu4ALkxUMTh1is pmq4Px/l+YFsUocQ1u3L71Lmy7wrRpjjKaaiE88pkZyz9Qd5xQrqmdlsOQ2Js00f AwLhWridvoB8vcvg70znm4AZNQM5jxJ9JCETsY4rYg7eKcI9sjcpbCvF+lefeoUY i8/5sesXzKzQh3CXi7hRfLI+jFbLotiwDDKsTRnl+hMlbCPsLNrusud5Ri7ujj3d xzX0nYhWbgqmA7VCnPqzjdOrtXfXzIz3mjoVvXG9JrGYAaOwf8s= =6SGJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Request for a technical review
On 13/12/2018 08:33, Jäkel, Guido wrote: > Dear Mallory and Mark, > > then I'm the one of the rare who use an "unusual" setups for more than 10 > years :) . On a staged farm of about 3*10 Tomcat's we run a whole bunch of > "webapps"; most of them in at least two instances for failover. > > But I never configured more than one Service and one Engine: There is only > one Service , with an AJP Connector for the reverse proxy (Apache httpd + > Jakarta) and a http Connector for service purposes. Inside, there is one > Engine and inside this, there are a bundle of Hosts for each domain needed > for the applications and inside each hosts (using an individual appBase for > each domain), the deployments spawn contexts for each application running. > Among this hosts, there's also a "localhost" taking the admin applications. > This one is addressed via the http Connector. What is unusual about that? Seems fairly standard virtual hosting to me. Mark > > Guido > >> -Original Message- >> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 3:26 PM >> To: users@tomcat.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Request for a technical review >> The first architecture diagram: >> - doesn't show any hosts >> - incorrectly classes a "Service" as a "webapp" (a context is a webapp) >> - shows the unusual setup of multiple services > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: Request for a technical review
Dear Mallory and Mark, then I'm the one of the rare who use an "unusual" setups for more than 10 years :) . On a staged farm of about 3*10 Tomcat's we run a whole bunch of "webapps"; most of them in at least two instances for failover. But I never configured more than one Service and one Engine: There is only one Service , with an AJP Connector for the reverse proxy (Apache httpd + Jakarta) and a http Connector for service purposes. Inside, there is one Engine and inside this, there are a bundle of Hosts for each domain needed for the applications and inside each hosts (using an individual appBase for each domain), the deployments spawn contexts for each application running. Among this hosts, there's also a "localhost" taking the admin applications. This one is addressed via the http Connector. Guido >-Original Message- >From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] >Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 3:26 PM >To: users@tomcat.apache.org >Subject: Re: Request for a technical review >The first architecture diagram: > - doesn't show any hosts > - incorrectly classes a "Service" as a "webapp" (a context is a webapp) > - shows the unusual setup of multiple services
Re: Request for a technical review
Appreciate your feedback, Mark. I'll get it incorporated ASAP. On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 8:26 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 11/12/2018 19:20, Mallory Mooney wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > It's been a long time coming, so I wanted to resurrect this thread one > more > > time to share the now published post. You can find it at > > https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/tomcat-architecture-and-performance/. > > Now I can see the document without having to authenticate... > > The first architecture diagram: > - doesn't show any hosts > - incorrectly classes a "Service" as a "webapp" (a context is a webapp) > - shows the unusual setup of multiple services > > "Server" and "Service" are not peers. "Service" must be nested inside > "Server". > > The following sentence is misleading at best: > "The engine returns the appropriate response (e.g., JSP page, servlet) > to the client based on the Host request-header field in the request." > > AJP allows integration with multiple reverse proxies. Not just httpd. > > It is extremely debatable whether using httpd for static content is more > efficient. > > The description of the differences between APR/native and NIO[2] is > wrong. All the connectors support non-blocking. When the switch between > non-blocking and simulated blocking happens depends on whether there is > an active request and the APIs used by the application. > > Note there can be more than one acceptor thread. > > The default for minSpareThreads does not agree with the Tomcat docs - it > should be 10. It is 25 for an Executor. > > Using an Executor doesn't "evenly distribute threads across multiple > connectors". By providing a single thread pool for multiple connectors > threads can be used more efficiently. That means that - rather than an > even distribution - a connector could be starved of threads during a > period of heavy load if all the threads are allocated to a different > connector (unlikely but possible). Any admin/monitoring services exposed > via HTTP probably needs to have a dedicated thread pool to ensure it is > always available. > > It would be worth including an upfront warning of about the (lack of) > security in JMX. There is almost no granularity in the access controls > and brute force are easy to mount but hard to detect. The Tomcat > security guide discusses this in more detail. > > maxTime isn't a "cumulative count". It is the longest time for any > single request to complete. > > Tomcat won't return 503s if it runs out of threads. It will simply drop > the connection. If a reverse proxy is being used, it will probably > return a 503 in those circumstances. > > Nothing jumped out at me while I was reading the metrics sections. I'd > probably add a note that an OOME means you need to restart the server. > An OOME might be recoverable or might not. As a user there is no way to > tell. The only safe thing to do is to restart. > > Mark > > > > > I hope everyone has a great week! > > Mallory > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 4:28 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > > > >> On 02/11/2018 16:34, Mallory Mooney wrote: > >>> Hi everyone! > >>> > >>> Just wanted to check-in to see if anyone has had the chance to take a > >> look > >>> at the draft and leave feedback. I'll be locking things down for this > one > >>> by Thursday of next week (Nov. 8), so there's some time left if you are > >>> still working through it. > >> > >> Note I suspect a number of folks aren't even looking at it because it is > >> behind an authentication-wall (regardless of how willingly / speedily > >> access is granted on request). > >> > >> Mark > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Have a great weekend! > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:52 AM Mallory Mooney < > >> mallory.moo...@datadoghq.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > Hi all! > > Just wanted to give you an update. I am working to get things for this > series wrapped up by the first week of November. Hopefully, that still > gives everyone enough time to review and leave any feedback. > > Mallory > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:37 PM Mallory Mooney < > mallory.moo...@datadoghq.com> wrote: > > > Igal, it will be available publicly once published! I don't have an > > official publish date yet but can share that when it becomes more > >> concrete. > > > > And no PRs yet, Chris! It's still in the less cool GDoc stage of the > > review process. :) > > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:36 PM Igal Sapir > wrote: > > > >> On 10/12/2018 11:23 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > >>> Mallory, > >>> > >>> On 10/12/18 13:23, Mallory Mooney wrote: > > I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out! > > > > Here is the link to the GDoc: > > > >>> > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jgUhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing > > Requesting access will still be needed, but I can grant that > >> ASAP. > > I want to make sure I can
Re: Request for a technical review
On 11/12/2018 19:20, Mallory Mooney wrote: > Hi all! > > It's been a long time coming, so I wanted to resurrect this thread one more > time to share the now published post. You can find it at > https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/tomcat-architecture-and-performance/. Now I can see the document without having to authenticate... The first architecture diagram: - doesn't show any hosts - incorrectly classes a "Service" as a "webapp" (a context is a webapp) - shows the unusual setup of multiple services "Server" and "Service" are not peers. "Service" must be nested inside "Server". The following sentence is misleading at best: "The engine returns the appropriate response (e.g., JSP page, servlet) to the client based on the Host request-header field in the request." AJP allows integration with multiple reverse proxies. Not just httpd. It is extremely debatable whether using httpd for static content is more efficient. The description of the differences between APR/native and NIO[2] is wrong. All the connectors support non-blocking. When the switch between non-blocking and simulated blocking happens depends on whether there is an active request and the APIs used by the application. Note there can be more than one acceptor thread. The default for minSpareThreads does not agree with the Tomcat docs - it should be 10. It is 25 for an Executor. Using an Executor doesn't "evenly distribute threads across multiple connectors". By providing a single thread pool for multiple connectors threads can be used more efficiently. That means that - rather than an even distribution - a connector could be starved of threads during a period of heavy load if all the threads are allocated to a different connector (unlikely but possible). Any admin/monitoring services exposed via HTTP probably needs to have a dedicated thread pool to ensure it is always available. It would be worth including an upfront warning of about the (lack of) security in JMX. There is almost no granularity in the access controls and brute force are easy to mount but hard to detect. The Tomcat security guide discusses this in more detail. maxTime isn't a "cumulative count". It is the longest time for any single request to complete. Tomcat won't return 503s if it runs out of threads. It will simply drop the connection. If a reverse proxy is being used, it will probably return a 503 in those circumstances. Nothing jumped out at me while I was reading the metrics sections. I'd probably add a note that an OOME means you need to restart the server. An OOME might be recoverable or might not. As a user there is no way to tell. The only safe thing to do is to restart. Mark > > I hope everyone has a great week! > Mallory > > > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 4:28 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On 02/11/2018 16:34, Mallory Mooney wrote: >>> Hi everyone! >>> >>> Just wanted to check-in to see if anyone has had the chance to take a >> look >>> at the draft and leave feedback. I'll be locking things down for this one >>> by Thursday of next week (Nov. 8), so there's some time left if you are >>> still working through it. >> >> Note I suspect a number of folks aren't even looking at it because it is >> behind an authentication-wall (regardless of how willingly / speedily >> access is granted on request). >> >> Mark >> >> >>> >>> Have a great weekend! >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:52 AM Mallory Mooney < >> mallory.moo...@datadoghq.com> >>> wrote: >>> Hi all! Just wanted to give you an update. I am working to get things for this series wrapped up by the first week of November. Hopefully, that still gives everyone enough time to review and leave any feedback. Mallory On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:37 PM Mallory Mooney < mallory.moo...@datadoghq.com> wrote: > Igal, it will be available publicly once published! I don't have an > official publish date yet but can share that when it becomes more >> concrete. > > And no PRs yet, Chris! It's still in the less cool GDoc stage of the > review process. :) > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:36 PM Igal Sapir wrote: > >> On 10/12/2018 11:23 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: >>> Mallory, >>> >>> On 10/12/18 13:23, Mallory Mooney wrote: > I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out! > > Here is the link to the GDoc: > >>> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jgUhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing > Requesting access will still be needed, but I can grant that >> ASAP. > I want to make sure I can attribute comments/suggestions to > specific people, so I know who to thank, and who to follow up with > if I need more clarification on a specific comment. Plus, it makes > the IT department happy. >>> What, no GitHub PRs? ;) >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Is that going to be publicly available or is it a >>>
Re: Request for a technical review
Hi all! It's been a long time coming, so I wanted to resurrect this thread one more time to share the now published post. You can find it at https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/tomcat-architecture-and-performance/. I hope everyone has a great week! Mallory On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 4:28 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 02/11/2018 16:34, Mallory Mooney wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > > > Just wanted to check-in to see if anyone has had the chance to take a > look > > at the draft and leave feedback. I'll be locking things down for this one > > by Thursday of next week (Nov. 8), so there's some time left if you are > > still working through it. > > Note I suspect a number of folks aren't even looking at it because it is > behind an authentication-wall (regardless of how willingly / speedily > access is granted on request). > > Mark > > > > > > Have a great weekend! > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:52 AM Mallory Mooney < > mallory.moo...@datadoghq.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi all! > >> > >> Just wanted to give you an update. I am working to get things for this > >> series wrapped up by the first week of November. Hopefully, that still > >> gives everyone enough time to review and leave any feedback. > >> > >> Mallory > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:37 PM Mallory Mooney < > >> mallory.moo...@datadoghq.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Igal, it will be available publicly once published! I don't have an > >>> official publish date yet but can share that when it becomes more > concrete. > >>> > >>> And no PRs yet, Chris! It's still in the less cool GDoc stage of the > >>> review process. :) > >>> > >>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:36 PM Igal Sapir wrote: > >>> > On 10/12/2018 11:23 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > Mallory, > > > > On 10/12/18 13:23, Mallory Mooney wrote: > >>> I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out! > >>> > >>> Here is the link to the GDoc: > >>> > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jgUhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing > >>> Requesting access will still be needed, but I can grant that > ASAP. > >>> I want to make sure I can attribute comments/suggestions to > >>> specific people, so I know who to thank, and who to follow up with > >>> if I need more clarification on a specific comment. Plus, it makes > >>> the IT department happy. > > What, no GitHub PRs? ;) > > > > +1 > > > > Is that going to be publicly available or is it a > > proprietary/private/commercial guide? > > > > > > Igal > > > > -chris > > > >>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:53 AM Christopher Schultz < > >>> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > >>> > >>> Mark, > >>> > >>> On 10/10/18 6:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring > >>> Tomcat (with or without Datadog). I'd love to get some > >>> feedback on the technical content. The project maintainers > >>> we reached out to recommended we post a request here. > >>> > >>> Would anyone be up for that? I can send the post link to > >>> someone directly. > >>> > >>> Appreciate your help and time! > >> Why not post the link here so the community can review the > >> document? > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> There are many active community members who have an interest in > >>> monitoring. I'm sure you'll get lots of feedback. > >>> > >>> -chris > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Mallory Mooney > >>> Technical Content Writer > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Mallory Mooney > >> Technical Content Writer > >> > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > -- Mallory Mooney Technical Content Writer
Re: Request for a technical review
On 02/11/2018 16:34, Mallory Mooney wrote: > Hi everyone! > > Just wanted to check-in to see if anyone has had the chance to take a look > at the draft and leave feedback. I'll be locking things down for this one > by Thursday of next week (Nov. 8), so there's some time left if you are > still working through it. Note I suspect a number of folks aren't even looking at it because it is behind an authentication-wall (regardless of how willingly / speedily access is granted on request). Mark > > Have a great weekend! > > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:52 AM Mallory Mooney > wrote: > >> Hi all! >> >> Just wanted to give you an update. I am working to get things for this >> series wrapped up by the first week of November. Hopefully, that still >> gives everyone enough time to review and leave any feedback. >> >> Mallory >> >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:37 PM Mallory Mooney < >> mallory.moo...@datadoghq.com> wrote: >> >>> Igal, it will be available publicly once published! I don't have an >>> official publish date yet but can share that when it becomes more concrete. >>> >>> And no PRs yet, Chris! It's still in the less cool GDoc stage of the >>> review process. :) >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:36 PM Igal Sapir wrote: >>> On 10/12/2018 11:23 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Mallory, > > On 10/12/18 13:23, Mallory Mooney wrote: >>> I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out! >>> >>> Here is the link to the GDoc: >>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jgUhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing >>> Requesting access will still be needed, but I can grant that ASAP. >>> I want to make sure I can attribute comments/suggestions to >>> specific people, so I know who to thank, and who to follow up with >>> if I need more clarification on a specific comment. Plus, it makes >>> the IT department happy. > What, no GitHub PRs? ;) > > +1 > > Is that going to be publicly available or is it a > proprietary/private/commercial guide? > > > Igal > > -chris > >>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:53 AM Christopher Schultz < >>> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: >>> >>> Mark, >>> >>> On 10/10/18 6:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring >>> Tomcat (with or without Datadog). I'd love to get some >>> feedback on the technical content. The project maintainers >>> we reached out to recommended we post a request here. >>> >>> Would anyone be up for that? I can send the post link to >>> someone directly. >>> >>> Appreciate your help and time! >> Why not post the link here so the community can review the >> document? >>> +1 >>> >>> There are many active community members who have an interest in >>> monitoring. I'm sure you'll get lots of feedback. >>> >>> -chris - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >>> >>> -- >>> Mallory Mooney >>> Technical Content Writer >>> >> >> >> -- >> Mallory Mooney >> Technical Content Writer >> > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Request for a technical review
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mallory, On 11/2/18 12:34, Mallory Mooney wrote: > Hi everyone! > > Just wanted to check-in to see if anyone has had the chance to take > a look at the draft and leave feedback. I'll be locking things down > for this one by Thursday of next week (Nov. 8), so there's some > time left if you are still working through it. In your section on connector/protocol types, you say that Tomcat auto-switches between APR and NIO, and that the default is APR. That is not true in Tomcat 8.5 and later, where NIO is the default unless the APR Lifecycle Listener's "useAprConnector" attribute has been set to true (the default value for that is false). Your description about garbage collection seems to indicate that Tomcat is somehow involved in GC algorithm selection. It's not: that's entirely up to the JVM, of course. Also, OOME's don't cause crashes. They cause confusion, since some application's aren't resilient, and the JVM itself rarely goes down, so some devs and admins think everything is okay. Generally, it's not okay, but it might look okay. There are also OOMEs which are completely benign and can be ignored. Knowing which is which comes with experience. - -chris > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:52 AM Mallory Mooney > wrote: > >> Hi all! >> >> Just wanted to give you an update. I am working to get things for >> this series wrapped up by the first week of November. Hopefully, >> that still gives everyone enough time to review and leave any >> feedback. >> >> Mallory >> >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:37 PM Mallory Mooney < >> mallory.moo...@datadoghq.com> wrote: >> >>> Igal, it will be available publicly once published! I don't >>> have an official publish date yet but can share that when it >>> becomes more concrete. >>> >>> And no PRs yet, Chris! It's still in the less cool GDoc stage >>> of the review process. :) >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:36 PM Igal Sapir >>> wrote: >>> On 10/12/2018 11:23 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Mallory, > > On 10/12/18 13:23, Mallory Mooney wrote: >>> I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help >>> out! >>> >>> Here is the link to the GDoc: >>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI5 6_jgUhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing >>> > Requesting access will still be needed, but I can grant that ASAP. >>> I want to make sure I can attribute >>> comments/suggestions to specific people, so I know who >>> to thank, and who to follow up with if I need more >>> clarification on a specific comment. Plus, it makes the >>> IT department happy. > What, no GitHub PRs? ;) > > +1 > > Is that going to be publicly available or is it a > proprietary/private/commercial guide? > > > Igal > > -chris > >>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:53 AM Christopher Schultz < >>> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: >>> >>> Mark, >>> >>> On 10/10/18 6:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about >>> monitoring Tomcat (with or without Datadog). >>> I'd love to get some feedback on the technical >>> content. The project maintainers we reached out >>> to recommended we post a request here. >>> >>> Would anyone be up for that? I can send the >>> post link to someone directly. >>> >>> Appreciate your help and time! >> Why not post the link here so the community can >> review the document? >>> +1 >>> >>> There are many active community members who have an >>> interest in monitoring. I'm sure you'll get lots of >>> feedback. >>> >>> -chris --- - -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > -- - --- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: > users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > --- - -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >>> >>> -- Mallory Mooney Technical Content Writer >>> >> >> >> -- Mallory Mooney Technical Content Writer >> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAlvctPEACgkQHPApP6U8 pFi/vA/+LkINXqxpg73sWHH7kuAtLvQ007NUYyPln6htAYYWkKc4UI55N/JemxhB
Re: Request for a technical review
Hi everyone! Just wanted to check-in to see if anyone has had the chance to take a look at the draft and leave feedback. I'll be locking things down for this one by Thursday of next week (Nov. 8), so there's some time left if you are still working through it. Have a great weekend! On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:52 AM Mallory Mooney wrote: > Hi all! > > Just wanted to give you an update. I am working to get things for this > series wrapped up by the first week of November. Hopefully, that still > gives everyone enough time to review and leave any feedback. > > Mallory > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:37 PM Mallory Mooney < > mallory.moo...@datadoghq.com> wrote: > >> Igal, it will be available publicly once published! I don't have an >> official publish date yet but can share that when it becomes more concrete. >> >> And no PRs yet, Chris! It's still in the less cool GDoc stage of the >> review process. :) >> >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:36 PM Igal Sapir wrote: >> >>> On 10/12/2018 11:23 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: >>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> > Hash: SHA256 >>> > >>> > Mallory, >>> > >>> > On 10/12/18 13:23, Mallory Mooney wrote: >>> >> I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out! >>> >> >>> >> Here is the link to the GDoc: >>> >> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jgUhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing >>> >> Requesting access will still be needed, but I can grant that ASAP. >>> >> I want to make sure I can attribute comments/suggestions to >>> >> specific people, so I know who to thank, and who to follow up with >>> >> if I need more clarification on a specific comment. Plus, it makes >>> >> the IT department happy. >>> > What, no GitHub PRs? ;) >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Is that going to be publicly available or is it a >>> proprietary/private/commercial guide? >>> >>> >>> Igal >>> >>> > - -chris >>> > >>> >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:53 AM Christopher Schultz < >>> >> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Mark, >>> >> >>> >> On 10/10/18 6:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> > On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote: >>> >> Hi all, >>> >> >>> >> I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring >>> >> Tomcat (with or without Datadog). I'd love to get some >>> >> feedback on the technical content. The project maintainers >>> >> we reached out to recommended we post a request here. >>> >> >>> >> Would anyone be up for that? I can send the post link to >>> >> someone directly. >>> >> >>> >> Appreciate your help and time! >>> > Why not post the link here so the community can review the >>> > document? >>> >> +1 >>> >> >>> >> There are many active community members who have an interest in >>> >> monitoring. I'm sure you'll get lots of feedback. >>> >> >>> >> -chris >>> >>> - >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- >>> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ >>> > >>> > iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAlvA5qUACgkQHPApP6U8 >>> > pFjPDg/+NNmp2sdTXhuPD2cXJTtBGXGMoOLost629AJF2R5ddG79a685TDPENn6B >>> > NVPInUppI6U42RgK9hYs6/3JNpHfMIDay8HC7zaErAiu4wBHowI3yFckofYJjUwD >>> > Wcd2Wzo+eBDZrf2PgwqiBr41nw7kbkeEAQcGeBVce7RL/+3r8Fz7FG++P5Bguu7d >>> > 0N9S7y6leD3AdkX1o+JC9hQ6/AP2F8rZc8sws57Q2dpeV5QtK+8Pf2qOQpd6fskB >>> > RDK4RQ1f4nLeAZgQ6BibUkwOQj6Fw7jPBHKGIfm6m5MOHvROkRTMV+fX3oLAd/dG >>> > 3S1aW/9x8WIbKgYShR9ixxca5QuBNICC/tt9/oTYNj3XPbZLalMmMgOZ/cJcNI+R >>> > kORA8ehwACeP/hIb/aLztze5g8FqyPslM95VPH/TWqgQXxe7bgU5fb6nUF/aCa87 >>> > RC/JXjZ/TZwMM+9xw1PQGH8aXqVGoku4Q/cbwXa4ctqklMKdGzlYRjY7TVjrqyec >>> > ZMdFMgDb76wmDg2luD2g7jUmJJVdAtYiGXIidt5k8EtvymK6Nq/sEwj1SApV5jhT >>> > PGdViui42IeL6IIwKY9gbuihL4btm0we9OXeeVc6fn99lySvsI8JZVgIQJzNmWEX >>> > axmPUrQZI9iIr8qC9tufcuZOxwHpgCjYPIpM4IsR4/vlZv2VpQc= >>> > =j6GH >>> > -END PGP SIGNATURE- >>> > >>> > - >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >>> > >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Mallory Mooney >> Technical Content Writer >> > > > -- > Mallory Mooney > Technical Content Writer > -- Mallory Mooney Technical Content Writer
Re: Request for a technical review
Hi all! Just wanted to give you an update. I am working to get things for this series wrapped up by the first week of November. Hopefully, that still gives everyone enough time to review and leave any feedback. Mallory On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:37 PM Mallory Mooney wrote: > Igal, it will be available publicly once published! I don't have an > official publish date yet but can share that when it becomes more concrete. > > And no PRs yet, Chris! It's still in the less cool GDoc stage of the > review process. :) > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:36 PM Igal Sapir wrote: > >> On 10/12/2018 11:23 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> > Hash: SHA256 >> > >> > Mallory, >> > >> > On 10/12/18 13:23, Mallory Mooney wrote: >> >> I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out! >> >> >> >> Here is the link to the GDoc: >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jgUhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing >> >> Requesting access will still be needed, but I can grant that ASAP. >> >> I want to make sure I can attribute comments/suggestions to >> >> specific people, so I know who to thank, and who to follow up with >> >> if I need more clarification on a specific comment. Plus, it makes >> >> the IT department happy. >> > What, no GitHub PRs? ;) >> >> +1 >> >> Is that going to be publicly available or is it a >> proprietary/private/commercial guide? >> >> >> Igal >> >> > - -chris >> > >> >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:53 AM Christopher Schultz < >> >> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> Mark, >> >> >> >> On 10/10/18 6:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> > On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring >> >> Tomcat (with or without Datadog). I'd love to get some >> >> feedback on the technical content. The project maintainers >> >> we reached out to recommended we post a request here. >> >> >> >> Would anyone be up for that? I can send the post link to >> >> someone directly. >> >> >> >> Appreciate your help and time! >> > Why not post the link here so the community can review the >> > document? >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> There are many active community members who have an interest in >> >> monitoring. I'm sure you'll get lots of feedback. >> >> >> >> -chris >> >>> - >> >>> >> >>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >>> >> >>> >> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- >> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ >> > >> > iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAlvA5qUACgkQHPApP6U8 >> > pFjPDg/+NNmp2sdTXhuPD2cXJTtBGXGMoOLost629AJF2R5ddG79a685TDPENn6B >> > NVPInUppI6U42RgK9hYs6/3JNpHfMIDay8HC7zaErAiu4wBHowI3yFckofYJjUwD >> > Wcd2Wzo+eBDZrf2PgwqiBr41nw7kbkeEAQcGeBVce7RL/+3r8Fz7FG++P5Bguu7d >> > 0N9S7y6leD3AdkX1o+JC9hQ6/AP2F8rZc8sws57Q2dpeV5QtK+8Pf2qOQpd6fskB >> > RDK4RQ1f4nLeAZgQ6BibUkwOQj6Fw7jPBHKGIfm6m5MOHvROkRTMV+fX3oLAd/dG >> > 3S1aW/9x8WIbKgYShR9ixxca5QuBNICC/tt9/oTYNj3XPbZLalMmMgOZ/cJcNI+R >> > kORA8ehwACeP/hIb/aLztze5g8FqyPslM95VPH/TWqgQXxe7bgU5fb6nUF/aCa87 >> > RC/JXjZ/TZwMM+9xw1PQGH8aXqVGoku4Q/cbwXa4ctqklMKdGzlYRjY7TVjrqyec >> > ZMdFMgDb76wmDg2luD2g7jUmJJVdAtYiGXIidt5k8EtvymK6Nq/sEwj1SApV5jhT >> > PGdViui42IeL6IIwKY9gbuihL4btm0we9OXeeVc6fn99lySvsI8JZVgIQJzNmWEX >> > axmPUrQZI9iIr8qC9tufcuZOxwHpgCjYPIpM4IsR4/vlZv2VpQc= >> > =j6GH >> > -END PGP SIGNATURE- >> > >> > - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> > >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> > > -- > Mallory Mooney > Technical Content Writer > -- Mallory Mooney Technical Content Writer
Re: Request for a technical review
Igal, it will be available publicly once published! I don't have an official publish date yet but can share that when it becomes more concrete. And no PRs yet, Chris! It's still in the less cool GDoc stage of the review process. :) On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:36 PM Igal Sapir wrote: > On 10/12/2018 11:23 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Mallory, > > > > On 10/12/18 13:23, Mallory Mooney wrote: > >> I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out! > >> > >> Here is the link to the GDoc: > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jgUhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing > >> Requesting access will still be needed, but I can grant that ASAP. > >> I want to make sure I can attribute comments/suggestions to > >> specific people, so I know who to thank, and who to follow up with > >> if I need more clarification on a specific comment. Plus, it makes > >> the IT department happy. > > What, no GitHub PRs? ;) > > +1 > > Is that going to be publicly available or is it a > proprietary/private/commercial guide? > > > Igal > > > - -chris > > > >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:53 AM Christopher Schultz < > >> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > >> > >> Mark, > >> > >> On 10/10/18 6:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring > >> Tomcat (with or without Datadog). I'd love to get some > >> feedback on the technical content. The project maintainers > >> we reached out to recommended we post a request here. > >> > >> Would anyone be up for that? I can send the post link to > >> someone directly. > >> > >> Appreciate your help and time! > > Why not post the link here so the community can review the > > document? > >> +1 > >> > >> There are many active community members who have an interest in > >> monitoring. I'm sure you'll get lots of feedback. > >> > >> -chris > >>> - > >>> > >>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >>> > >>> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ > > > > iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAlvA5qUACgkQHPApP6U8 > > pFjPDg/+NNmp2sdTXhuPD2cXJTtBGXGMoOLost629AJF2R5ddG79a685TDPENn6B > > NVPInUppI6U42RgK9hYs6/3JNpHfMIDay8HC7zaErAiu4wBHowI3yFckofYJjUwD > > Wcd2Wzo+eBDZrf2PgwqiBr41nw7kbkeEAQcGeBVce7RL/+3r8Fz7FG++P5Bguu7d > > 0N9S7y6leD3AdkX1o+JC9hQ6/AP2F8rZc8sws57Q2dpeV5QtK+8Pf2qOQpd6fskB > > RDK4RQ1f4nLeAZgQ6BibUkwOQj6Fw7jPBHKGIfm6m5MOHvROkRTMV+fX3oLAd/dG > > 3S1aW/9x8WIbKgYShR9ixxca5QuBNICC/tt9/oTYNj3XPbZLalMmMgOZ/cJcNI+R > > kORA8ehwACeP/hIb/aLztze5g8FqyPslM95VPH/TWqgQXxe7bgU5fb6nUF/aCa87 > > RC/JXjZ/TZwMM+9xw1PQGH8aXqVGoku4Q/cbwXa4ctqklMKdGzlYRjY7TVjrqyec > > ZMdFMgDb76wmDg2luD2g7jUmJJVdAtYiGXIidt5k8EtvymK6Nq/sEwj1SApV5jhT > > PGdViui42IeL6IIwKY9gbuihL4btm0we9OXeeVc6fn99lySvsI8JZVgIQJzNmWEX > > axmPUrQZI9iIr8qC9tufcuZOxwHpgCjYPIpM4IsR4/vlZv2VpQc= > > =j6GH > > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > -- Mallory Mooney Technical Content Writer
Re: Request for a technical review
On 10/12/2018 11:23 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mallory, On 10/12/18 13:23, Mallory Mooney wrote: I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out! Here is the link to the GDoc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jgUhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing Requesting access will still be needed, but I can grant that ASAP. I want to make sure I can attribute comments/suggestions to specific people, so I know who to thank, and who to follow up with if I need more clarification on a specific comment. Plus, it makes the IT department happy. What, no GitHub PRs? ;) +1 Is that going to be publicly available or is it a proprietary/private/commercial guide? Igal - -chris On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:53 AM Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: Mark, On 10/10/18 6:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote: Hi all, I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring Tomcat (with or without Datadog). I'd love to get some feedback on the technical content. The project maintainers we reached out to recommended we post a request here. Would anyone be up for that? I can send the post link to someone directly. Appreciate your help and time! Why not post the link here so the community can review the document? +1 There are many active community members who have an interest in monitoring. I'm sure you'll get lots of feedback. -chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAlvA5qUACgkQHPApP6U8 pFjPDg/+NNmp2sdTXhuPD2cXJTtBGXGMoOLost629AJF2R5ddG79a685TDPENn6B NVPInUppI6U42RgK9hYs6/3JNpHfMIDay8HC7zaErAiu4wBHowI3yFckofYJjUwD Wcd2Wzo+eBDZrf2PgwqiBr41nw7kbkeEAQcGeBVce7RL/+3r8Fz7FG++P5Bguu7d 0N9S7y6leD3AdkX1o+JC9hQ6/AP2F8rZc8sws57Q2dpeV5QtK+8Pf2qOQpd6fskB RDK4RQ1f4nLeAZgQ6BibUkwOQj6Fw7jPBHKGIfm6m5MOHvROkRTMV+fX3oLAd/dG 3S1aW/9x8WIbKgYShR9ixxca5QuBNICC/tt9/oTYNj3XPbZLalMmMgOZ/cJcNI+R kORA8ehwACeP/hIb/aLztze5g8FqyPslM95VPH/TWqgQXxe7bgU5fb6nUF/aCa87 RC/JXjZ/TZwMM+9xw1PQGH8aXqVGoku4Q/cbwXa4ctqklMKdGzlYRjY7TVjrqyec ZMdFMgDb76wmDg2luD2g7jUmJJVdAtYiGXIidt5k8EtvymK6Nq/sEwj1SApV5jhT PGdViui42IeL6IIwKY9gbuihL4btm0we9OXeeVc6fn99lySvsI8JZVgIQJzNmWEX axmPUrQZI9iIr8qC9tufcuZOxwHpgCjYPIpM4IsR4/vlZv2VpQc= =j6GH -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Request for a technical review
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mallory, On 10/12/18 13:23, Mallory Mooney wrote: > I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out! > > Here is the link to the GDoc: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jg UhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing > > Requesting access will still be needed, but I can grant that ASAP. > I want to make sure I can attribute comments/suggestions to > specific people, so I know who to thank, and who to follow up with > if I need more clarification on a specific comment. Plus, it makes > the IT department happy. What, no GitHub PRs? ;) - -chris > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:53 AM Christopher Schultz < > ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > > Mark, > > On 10/10/18 6:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote: > Hi all, > > I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring > Tomcat (with or without Datadog). I'd love to get some > feedback on the technical content. The project maintainers > we reached out to recommended we post a request here. > > Would anyone be up for that? I can send the post link to > someone directly. > > Appreciate your help and time! Why not post the link here so the community can review the document? > > +1 > > There are many active community members who have an interest in > monitoring. I'm sure you'll get lots of feedback. > > -chris >> >> - >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAlvA5qUACgkQHPApP6U8 pFjPDg/+NNmp2sdTXhuPD2cXJTtBGXGMoOLost629AJF2R5ddG79a685TDPENn6B NVPInUppI6U42RgK9hYs6/3JNpHfMIDay8HC7zaErAiu4wBHowI3yFckofYJjUwD Wcd2Wzo+eBDZrf2PgwqiBr41nw7kbkeEAQcGeBVce7RL/+3r8Fz7FG++P5Bguu7d 0N9S7y6leD3AdkX1o+JC9hQ6/AP2F8rZc8sws57Q2dpeV5QtK+8Pf2qOQpd6fskB RDK4RQ1f4nLeAZgQ6BibUkwOQj6Fw7jPBHKGIfm6m5MOHvROkRTMV+fX3oLAd/dG 3S1aW/9x8WIbKgYShR9ixxca5QuBNICC/tt9/oTYNj3XPbZLalMmMgOZ/cJcNI+R kORA8ehwACeP/hIb/aLztze5g8FqyPslM95VPH/TWqgQXxe7bgU5fb6nUF/aCa87 RC/JXjZ/TZwMM+9xw1PQGH8aXqVGoku4Q/cbwXa4ctqklMKdGzlYRjY7TVjrqyec ZMdFMgDb76wmDg2luD2g7jUmJJVdAtYiGXIidt5k8EtvymK6Nq/sEwj1SApV5jhT PGdViui42IeL6IIwKY9gbuihL4btm0we9OXeeVc6fn99lySvsI8JZVgIQJzNmWEX axmPUrQZI9iIr8qC9tufcuZOxwHpgCjYPIpM4IsR4/vlZv2VpQc= =j6GH -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Request for a technical review
I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out! Here is the link to the GDoc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jgUhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing Requesting access will still be needed, but I can grant that ASAP. I want to make sure I can attribute comments/suggestions to specific people, so I know who to thank, and who to follow up with if I need more clarification on a specific comment. Plus, it makes the IT department happy. On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:53 AM Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Mark, > > On 10/10/18 6:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring Tomcat > >> (with or without Datadog). I'd love to get some feedback on the > >> technical content. The project maintainers we reached out to > >> recommended we post a request here. > >> > >> Would anyone be up for that? I can send the post link to someone > >> directly. > >> > >> Appreciate your help and time! > > > > Why not post the link here so the community can review the > > document? > > +1 > > There are many active community members who have an interest in > monitoring. I'm sure you'll get lots of feedback. > > - -chris > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAlu/Y9oACgkQHPApP6U8 > pFgX2Q//ZyyT4k/7AywjEY8x4V6vihut86qEU9IP9GQQ9QuiiSJugqU9ngXSDTfg > yB8ftIVGz6FJG+TM1jA5FmcwAMNQ1I1/hxA2pfOYJX6lyowQT0Cy3wd0P5uE5S1O > pLqScf1IaHGZ3nNIfxTMQ2O25pp01LZX7V6VGkTVXHUClY8BphyWcSAy7v52hZ41 > /n9RIxRUSY9qQEEBCKU3JXksN0Ljza1y+Rzh4tUbOtbtI/hCGnvogP3NZ8kH2dAo > hDdxEzCYAz5whOjzZU4348zY1h2IUytrjTXATt6gQRKtZ77S5MxvcDasDSBysHpc > duzdYrErQA71VDJmj2Wgikr/0mej7PUwu/so3WVsxoAyt1SA+Lmc2ldhTJay3bkr > zKjb6j5PpLYL+aLyzj4MR9ng1Mg1c7xFO9zMcZ+Ap4Gw2PgcP+jszDuf6TIzfoC9 > Zd3q9HhnIhR+Cjcz2F5qanw1mF+BgazRdkOjg+qzDfM8NMK28dZoKIjIYQDKnOPF > 2iIRnIq3aPQT3tcgmKwjQpcI1CYvMQe+U9RTt1YBQRzo0Vc4clX9JugM57XVEpEV > e9gNHT3BBK4GeUB8Y85K/BelQ/Rfl4Xk2BIP6R6qmSKvKGXYySFpiKrOgPtKbQhi > EyRCVqSqgFP+U2QIZaFftcsDhQd/8OCLAOBaHDv/kxtHtLkuFL4= > =o6VG > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > -- Mallory Mooney Technical Content Writer
Re: Request for a technical review
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mark, On 10/10/18 6:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring Tomcat >> (with or without Datadog). I'd love to get some feedback on the >> technical content. The project maintainers we reached out to >> recommended we post a request here. >> >> Would anyone be up for that? I can send the post link to someone >> directly. >> >> Appreciate your help and time! > > Why not post the link here so the community can review the > document? +1 There are many active community members who have an interest in monitoring. I'm sure you'll get lots of feedback. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAlu/Y9oACgkQHPApP6U8 pFgX2Q//ZyyT4k/7AywjEY8x4V6vihut86qEU9IP9GQQ9QuiiSJugqU9ngXSDTfg yB8ftIVGz6FJG+TM1jA5FmcwAMNQ1I1/hxA2pfOYJX6lyowQT0Cy3wd0P5uE5S1O pLqScf1IaHGZ3nNIfxTMQ2O25pp01LZX7V6VGkTVXHUClY8BphyWcSAy7v52hZ41 /n9RIxRUSY9qQEEBCKU3JXksN0Ljza1y+Rzh4tUbOtbtI/hCGnvogP3NZ8kH2dAo hDdxEzCYAz5whOjzZU4348zY1h2IUytrjTXATt6gQRKtZ77S5MxvcDasDSBysHpc duzdYrErQA71VDJmj2Wgikr/0mej7PUwu/so3WVsxoAyt1SA+Lmc2ldhTJay3bkr zKjb6j5PpLYL+aLyzj4MR9ng1Mg1c7xFO9zMcZ+Ap4Gw2PgcP+jszDuf6TIzfoC9 Zd3q9HhnIhR+Cjcz2F5qanw1mF+BgazRdkOjg+qzDfM8NMK28dZoKIjIYQDKnOPF 2iIRnIq3aPQT3tcgmKwjQpcI1CYvMQe+U9RTt1YBQRzo0Vc4clX9JugM57XVEpEV e9gNHT3BBK4GeUB8Y85K/BelQ/Rfl4Xk2BIP6R6qmSKvKGXYySFpiKrOgPtKbQhi EyRCVqSqgFP+U2QIZaFftcsDhQd/8OCLAOBaHDv/kxtHtLkuFL4= =o6VG -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Request for a technical review
On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote: > Hi all, > > I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring Tomcat (with or > without Datadog). I'd love to get some feedback on the technical content. > The project maintainers we reached out to recommended we post a request > here. > > Would anyone be up for that? I can send the post link to someone directly. > > Appreciate your help and time! Why not post the link here so the community can review the document? Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Request for a technical review
Hi Mallory, I can have a look. Please let me know further details. Thanks, Deepak Behera
Request for a technical review
Hi all, I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring Tomcat (with or without Datadog). I'd love to get some feedback on the technical content. The project maintainers we reached out to recommended we post a request here. Would anyone be up for that? I can send the post link to someone directly. Appreciate your help and time! -- Mallory Mooney Technical Content Writer
