Re: mod_jk : recovery_options

2009-03-31 Thread Rainer Jung
On 30.03.2009 22:24, Jorge Medina wrote: I did not get any response to my questions, but from previous messages (posted by Rainer Jung) I believe that using the default values for retry and recovery_options may produce the unexpected result I was having. I changed the recovery_options on my

RE: mod_jk : recovery_options

2009-03-31 Thread Jorge Medina
Danke schön Rainer! Yes, all my transaction requests use POST. We only allow GET to get a couple of static files. -Jorge -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de] Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:24 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk

RE: mod_jk : recovery_options

2009-03-30 Thread Jorge Medina
not seen the tests failing again. -Jorge -Original Message- From: Jorge Medina [mailto:jmed...@e-dialog.com] Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 4:16 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: mod_jk : recovery_options Hi, I have an automated test of a web services application running on Tomcat

mod_jk : recovery_options

2009-03-27 Thread Jorge Medina
Hi, I have an automated test of a web services application running on Tomcat (6.0.18) behind Apache (2.2.11) We use mod_jk (1.2.27) Our test suite runs a client against the Apache server on a system where we have a single Tomcat instance behind Apache. So far so good, all test passed.