Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-02 Thread Rajesh Cherukuri
for telnet immediateconnection refused is given telnet 10.xxx.xxx.xx 8911 Trying 10.xx.xx.x... telnet: connect to address 10.xx.x.xx: Connection refused here is the error log for the specifed time [Fri Feb 27 02:26:14.463 2015] [31713:140059770595072] [error]

Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-02 Thread Rainer Jung
Please don't top post, it makes following the communication very hard. Am 02.03.2015 um 12:48 schrieb Rajesh Cherukuri: for telnet immediateconnection refused is given telnet 10.xxx.xxx.xx 8911 Trying 10.xx.xx.x... telnet: connect to address 10.xx.x.xx: Connection refused Then I

Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-02 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 02.03.2015 um 10:45 schrieb Rajesh Cherukuri: here is what i can see in modJk log file , we have stopped tomcat 11 a week back , 172.x [27/Feb/2015:*02:28:14* +] GET /xx/deal-finder HTTP/1.1200 15172 20 *lb* tomcat--11** 0 26712 12118 **tomcat-03** 0 820679 4

Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-02 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 02.03.2015 um 11:34 schrieb Rajesh Cherukuri: rainer looks like what you said is correct , but not sure why the Mod_jk has to wait for 10 seconds when the backend tomcat servers is down Because your network layer behaves like that. It simply hangs for (more than) 10 seconds. You should be

Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-02 Thread Rajesh Cherukuri
rainer looks like what you said is correct , but not sure why the Mod_jk has to wait for 10 seconds when the backend tomcat servers is down here is the error log i don't see that any place where it is aitng for 20 sec error log [Thu Feb 26 01:28:35.432 2015] [19535:140214433396480] [error]

Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-02 Thread Rajesh Cherukuri
here is what i can see in modJk log file , we have stopped tomcat 11 a week back , 172.x [27/Feb/2015:*02:28:14* +] GET /xx/deal-finder HTTP/1.1200 15172 20 *lb* tomcat--11** 0 26712 12118 **tomcat-03** 0 820679 4 *20.352845* – worker configuration *here is my

Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-02 Thread Rajesh Cherukuri
Yes it is always 20 sec always the case when the MOD_jk assigns the request to the tomcat that was down using Mod_jk 1.2.37 version On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: Please don't top post, it makes following the communication very hard. Am 02.03.2015

Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-02 Thread Frederik Nosi
Please dont top post. On 03/02/2015 04:07 PM, Rajesh Cherukuri wrote: Yes it is always 20 sec always the case when the MOD_jk assigns the request to the tomcat that was down Are you sure that there's not some other tomcat in the same load balanced worker that's in hang? Didnt had time to

Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-02 Thread André Warnier
For an explanation of what we mean by please do not top post, see here : http://www.idallen.com/topposting.html Got it ? Rajesh Cherukuri wrote: Yes it is always 20 sec always the case when the MOD_jk assigns the request to the tomcat that was down using Mod_jk 1.2.37 version On Mon, Mar 2,

mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-01 Thread Rajesh Cherukuri
hi today i have noticed that mod_jk took 20 seconds delay in sending the request to backend tomcat servers from apache , lookslike the request was assigned to a tomcat 11and it has replicate the request to the other tomcat-3 here are my findings Deal Finder request * Apache request access

Re: mod_jk dealy sendng request to backend tomcat

2015-03-01 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 01.03.2015 um 17:57 schrieb Rajesh Cherukuri: hi today i have noticed that mod_jk took 20 seconds delay in sending the request to backend tomcat servers from apache , lookslike the request was assigned to a tomcat 11and it has replicate the request to the other tomcat-3 here are my findings