Re: [users] Hook request

2005-02-01 Thread Ron Guerin
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 12:16 -0800, Bill Shupp wrote: Ron Guerin wrote: The more I think about this, the more it seems like it might not be a bad idea for very large sites. However, it should be an option set in config.php. Can you easily alter it to work that way? How about this?

Re: [users] Hook request

2005-01-25 Thread Bill Shupp
Ron Guerin wrote: I'd submit a patch but I'm under the impression I haven't made the case for it being worth accepting. The more I think about this, the more it seems like it might not be a bad idea for very large sites. However, it should be an option set in config.php. Can you easily

Re: [users] Hook request

2005-01-22 Thread Ron Guerin
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 15:44 -0500, dopry wrote: Why not handle it through update-data.sh? I do, actually. That's what happens as a result. I've changed that not to actually run make though, it also sets a flag. Under the circumstances, I can't have multiple things running that are under the

Re: [users] Hook request

2005-01-22 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
Ron Guerin wrote: Oh well, I tried. ;) If I'm the only one who cares, then I'm sure you're right. And it's a small enough change that it's not a big deal for me to do it when there's a new version. I just try to make all patching a last resort. You could always submit a patch and ask Bill to

Re: [users] Hook request

2005-01-22 Thread Ron Guerin
On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 15:39 -0500, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote: Ron Guerin wrote: Oh well, I tried. ;) If I'm the only one who cares, then I'm sure you're right. And it's a small enough change that it's not a big deal for me to do it when there's a new version. I just try to make