Jochen Mader-2 wrote:
Just figured out how to do UnitTesting with Spring 3 and Wicket.
An alternative is to use http://wicketpagetest.sourceforge.net. It works
fine with Spring 3.0 without changing any of your code.
-
--
Kent Tong
Better way to unit test Wicket pages (http
Sorry for my late answer.
StaticWebApplicationContext doesn't cut it for me.
Your example contains a small mistake:
Inserting the mock-object won't work as registerSingleton expects to get a
Class.
As I want to create mock objects with EasyMock there are two approaches (as
far as I know).
The one
as I know).
The one I have shown before, involving the creation of the custom
ApplicationContextMock or using easy mock inside a testing-spring.xml.
CU
Jochen
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Wicket%2C-Spring-3-and-UnitTesting-tp27320784p27358526.html
Sent from
Oh man, you are right.
My eyes got a little selective on that line :)
Just figured out how to do UnitTesting with Spring 3 and Wicket.
Spring 3 introduced a check to see if a given context was a
WebApplicationContext. That means ApplicationContextMock is not suitable for
testing (giving the infamous No WebApplicationContext found: no
ContextLoaderListener
Please add this to http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/spring.html
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 11:48 +0100, Jochen Mader wrote:
Just figured out how to do UnitTesting with Spring 3 and Wicket.
Spring 3 introduced a check to see if a given context was a
WebApplicationContext. That means
/StaticWebApplicationContext.html
Jochen Mader-2 wrote:
Just figured out how to do UnitTesting with Spring 3 and Wicket.
Spring 3 introduced a check to see if a given context was a
WebApplicationContext. That means ApplicationContextMock is not suitable
for
testing (giving the infamous No WebApplicationContext
