11/03/2021 01:17, Jinkun Geng:
> Do you mean all components must be built inside bazel?
> >> Sort of. We have a project that is built on bazel. Now, we need to use the
> >> core functions of DPDK to replace the network primitives in our project,
> >> so that we can improve the performance of our
_
From: Thomas Monjalon
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 4:06 PM
To: Jinkun Geng
Cc: Stephen Hemminger ; c...@dpdk.org
; users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-users] Integration of DPDK into Bazel
11/03/2021 00:42, Jinkun Geng:
> For any project using bazel, if we want
11/03/2021 00:42, Jinkun Geng:
> For any project using bazel, if we want to use DPDK, then we need to compile
> DPDK stuff into bazel by ourselves. It is not a trivial thing and the
> bazelment (https://github.com/bazelment/dpdk) guys have spent much effort
> extracting the core files in DPDK
; c...@dpdk.org
; users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-users] Integration of DPDK into Bazel
09/03/2021 05:11, Jinkun Geng:
> Too bad. :<
Why is it too bad?
How the choice of an internal build system
can affect other projects?
From: Stephen Hemminger
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 01:32
09/03/2021 05:11, Jinkun Geng:
> Too bad. :<
Why is it too bad?
How the choice of an internal build system
can affect other projects?
From: Stephen Hemminger
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 01:32:16 +
> Jinkun Geng wrote:
>
> > Hi, all.
> > Since bazel building system is becoming more and more
