Re: [libreoffice-users] Which is the more up-to-date: LODev 5.3.3.0.0, or LO 1:5.3.5.2-2?

2017-08-20 Thread Doug Hutcheson
Hello zahra and thanks for replying. Everything seems to migrate with the update except for 'My Macros'. I have both LODev 5.3.3 and LO 5.3.5 installed. While using the development version, I wrote a lot of code which I put into libraries under 'My Macros', but the new version does not see them -

Re: [libreoffice-users] Which is the more up-to-date: LODev 5.3.3.0.0, or LO 1:5.3.5.2-2?

2017-08-20 Thread jonathon
On 08/20/2017 02:16 AM, Doug Hutcheson wrote: > version LO 1:5.3.5.2-2 and found it does not recognise the Basic libraries Assuming that is a typo for LibO 5.3.5, then that would be the more stable, and bug free version. If you don't like surprises, then stick with the "still" version, and

Re: [libreoffice-users] Which is the more up-to-date: LODev 5.3.3.0.0, or LO 1:5.3.5.2-2?

2017-08-20 Thread zahra a
hello. for sure, 5.3.5.2 is the last version which is up to date and maybe the most stable version until now. you dont need to change anything, or move your current setting to the newer version of libreoffice. after you upgrade your version of libreoffice, the settings are transfered to the newer

[libreoffice-users] Which is the more up-to-date: LODev 5.3.3.0.0, or LO 1:5.3.5.2-2?

2017-08-20 Thread Doug Hutcheson
I hve been using LODev 5.3.3.0.0 for some time and it has been great. Out of interest, I installed my distro (Fedora 26) version LO 1:5.3.5.2-2 and found it does not recognise the Basic libraries I created in Dev, although the Writer module has different (newer?) options in the tool bar. The