Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Writer ToC starts at §2 but hover shows §1

I should have added that if the empty text para between the ToC and the document text is deleted, then the ToC displays incorrectly. So for Martin to have his work behave nicely, I suggest he tries to add an empty text para right under the ToC. Philip -- To unsubscribe e-mail to:

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Writer ToC starts at §2 but hover shows §1

On 03/03/17 14:13, Philip Jackson wrote: > On 02/03/17 22:27, martin f krafft wrote: > > Interesting. I can reproduce this on LO Writer 5.1.4.2 using > UbuntuStudio 1604LTS and with only Heading 1 style as Level 1 and Text > Body style as Level 2 to get the numbered paragraphs. > > Using F12

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Writer ToC starts at §2 but hover shows §1

On 02/03/17 22:27, martin f krafft wrote: > I also managed to reproduce this in a new document, which I've > uploaded here: > The problem seems to relate to (ab)using outline numbering to number > paragraphs, i.e. Level 1 is Heading 1, but Level 2 is associated > with the Text body style (as per

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Writer ToC starts at §2 but hover shows §1

also sprach martin f krafft [2017-03-03 10:27 +1300]: > Even though there are no instances of either Heading 1 or Text body > before the first header, this seems to throw off display of the TOC > (which the hover-text for links is just fine). So I guess, a bug… Maybe #31379

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Writer ToC starts at §2 but hover shows §1

also sprach libreoffice-ml.mbou...@spamgourmet.com [2017-03-03 09:48 +1300]: > Seems to work OK for me, with LibreOffice 5.3.0.3 on Windows. Does > this happen with every document, or just the one? All I can think > to try is right-click within the table

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Writer ToC starts at §2 but hover shows §1

martin f krafft wrote: also sprach martin f krafft [2017-03-02 11:07 +1300]: Please see the attached screenshots for the ToC with the hover text, as well as the setting in the index dialogue. The preview looks exactly right. Since this list strips attachments, here they