Re: [Kamailio-Users] lcr module creating extra branch
El Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:40:33 +0200 Jon Bonilla (Manwe) ma...@aholab.ehu.es escribió: Hi Forgot to comment: The correct behaviour should be just one INVITE like U 2010/04/08 17:51:09.614055 77.77.77.77:5060 - 91.121.117.27:5080 INVITE sip:+4644235465675...@sindominio.net SIP/2.0' right? If hostname is not NULL, Request-URI is rewritten based on gateway's URI scheme and hostname, and destination URI is set based on gateway's URI scheme, IP address, port, and transport protocol. Upon subsequent calls, the same is done, but instead of rewriting Request URI, a new branch is added. http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.0.x/modules/lcr.html#id3088147 ___ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Kamailio-Users] lcr module creating extra branch
El Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:11:35 +0300 j...@tutpro.com (Juha Heinanen) escribió: jon, since you have hostname defined, next_gw() function sets r-uri and destination uri and t_relay() should relay only based destination uri unless you call t_relay() more than once. No append_branch is executed at all. I have two INVITES IMHO because next_gw() function does create the second one. next_gw() function does not create any invites. check how your r-uri and dst uri look like after next_gw() call. -- juha Hi Juha I have xloged $du and $ru just after next_gw() call and also in branch_route: Afer next_gw ru=sip:58658765876587...@77.77.77.77 du=sip:91.121.117.27:5080 Branch ru=sip:58658765876587...@77.77.77.77 du=sip:91.121.117.27:5080 Branch ru=sip:58658765876587...@sindominio.net du=sip:58658765876587...@sindominio.net Setting hostname to NULL in gw table I get: Afer next_gw ru=sip:58658765876587...@77.77.77.77 du=null Branch ru=sip:58658765876587...@77.77.77.77 du=sip:58658765876587...@77.77.77.77 Branch ru=sip:58658765876587...@91.121.117.27:5080 du=sip:58658765876587...@91.121.117.27:5080 ___ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Kamailio-Users] lcr module creating extra branch
Jon Bonilla (Manwe) writes: I have xloged $du and $ru just after next_gw() call and also in branch_route: Afer next_gw ru=sip:58658765876587...@77.77.77.77 du=sip:91.121.117.27:5080 Branch ru=sip:58658765876587...@77.77.77.77 du=sip:91.121.117.27:5080 Branch ru=sip:58658765876587...@sindominio.net du=sip:58658765876587...@sindominio.net it is all ok after next_gw() call. try to figure out why do you enter branch route two times. you should be there only once (the first one). -- juha ___ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Kamailio-Users] lcr module creating extra branch
2010/4/8 Juha Heinanen j...@tutpro.com: Jon Bonilla (Manwe) writes: I have xloged $du and $ru just after next_gw() call and also in branch_route: Afer next_gw ru=sip:58658765876587...@77.77.77.77 du=sip:91.121.117.27:5080 Branch ru=sip:58658765876587...@77.77.77.77 du=sip:91.121.117.27:5080 Branch ru=sip:58658765876587...@sindominio.net du=sip:58658765876587...@sindominio.net it is all ok after next_gw() call. try to figure out why do you enter branch route two times. you should be there only once (the first one). Hi, IMHO it's not ok after netx_gw(). Note that the incomig INVITE is: INVITE sip:4644235465675...@77.77.77.77 When hostname is sindominio.org then after t_relay() ru ad du should look like: ru = sip:4644235465675...@sindominio.org du = sip:91.121.117.27:5080 but they are: ru = sip:58658765876587...@77.77.77.77 du = sip:91.121.117.27:5080 (note that the ruri domain has not been changed !!!). Setting hostname to NULL in gw table then after t_realy ru and du should be: ru = sip:4644235465675...@91.121.117.27:5080 du = null but they are: ru = sip:58658765876587...@77.77.77.77 du = null It's obviously wrong. Not sure why two branches are generated, but the values of ru and du after t_realy don't look correct for me. Regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo i...@aliax.net ___ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
