Re: TLS handshake performance

2017-06-06 Thread Jeff Elsloo
Hi Mark, Apologies for the late reply on this, but I was the person that asked you this performance question at ApacheCon. We reviewed this thread and appreciate the analysis and discussion. The description below is accurate; we have short lived non-keep-alived clients, so we're keenly interested

Re: TLS handshake performance

2017-05-19 Thread Rémy Maucherat
2017-05-19 16:28 GMT+02:00 Christopher Schultz : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Rémy, > > On 5/19/17 8:47 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > 2017-05-19 14:42 GMT+02:00 Christopher Schultz > > >> : > > > >> But here

Re: TLS handshake performance

2017-05-19 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Rémy, On 5/19/17 8:47 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > 2017-05-19 14:42 GMT+02:00 Christopher Schultz > > : > >> But here it's clear that the client wants to know "do I get a >> performance benefit swapping-out JSSE for

Re: TLS handshake performance

2017-05-19 Thread Rémy Maucherat
2017-05-19 14:42 GMT+02:00 Christopher Schultz : > But here it's clear that the client wants to know "do I get a > performance benefit swapping-out JSSE for OpenSSL. I think we all knew > what the answer was. Jean-Frederick's slides from yesterday I believe >

Re: TLS handshake performance

2017-05-19 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mark, On 5/18/17 9:47 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 18/05/2017 06:04, Christopher Schultz wrote: Mark, > > On 5/17/17 5:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: I got asked in the corridor at TomcatCon earlier today what the relative performance of the

Re: TLS handshake performance

2017-05-18 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 18.05.2017 um 16:03 schrieb john.e.gr...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID: -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 8:47 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: TLS handshake performance This time to the right list... On 18/05/2017 06:04

RE: TLS handshake performance

2017-05-18 Thread John.E.Gregg
> -Original Message- > From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 8:47 AM > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Re: TLS handshake performance > > This time to the right list... > > On 18/05/2017 06:04, Christopher Schult

Re: TLS handshake performance

2017-05-18 Thread Mark Thomas
This time to the right list... On 18/05/2017 06:04, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mark, On 5/17/17 5:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: I got asked in the corridor at TomcatCon earlier today what the relative performance of the TLS handshake was with

Re: TLS handshake performance

2017-05-18 Thread Rémy Maucherat
2017-05-17 23:31 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas : > Hi all, > > I got asked in the corridor at TomcatCon earlier today what the relative > performance of the TLS handshake was with 8.5.x, the NIO connector and JSSE > vs OpenSSL TLS implementation. > > This might be something that is of

Re: TLS handshake performance

2017-05-18 Thread Rémy Maucherat
2017-05-18 7:04 GMT+02:00 Christopher Schultz : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Mark, > > On 5/17/17 5:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > I got asked in the corridor at TomcatCon earlier today what the > > relative performance of the TLS handshake

Re: TLS handshake performance

2017-05-17 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mark, On 5/17/17 5:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > I got asked in the corridor at TomcatCon earlier today what the > relative performance of the TLS handshake was with 8.5.x, the NIO > connector and JSSE vs OpenSSL TLS implementation. I'm curious