[USMA:47386] Re: A silly milliliter--Coca Cola commemorative

2010-05-16 Thread Martin Vlietstra
Jim, Your maths might be correct, but the additional profit is small. When you look at the cost of selling a single 400 mL bottle of Coke, you will notice that the cost of the ingredients is a small part - the cost of storage is not affected, the cost of transportation is not affected, nor are

[USMA:47387] Re: A silly milliliter--Coca Cola commemorative

2010-05-16 Thread John M. Steele
Then I must play the Devil's Nitpicker. Both the Customary and metric claim must be true in the sense that average net contents must equal or exceed the claimed amount.  Since the 13.5 fl oz must be true, they saved only about 0.76 mL.  But they appear to be making a statement that they are

[USMA:47388] Re: A silly milliliter--Coca Cola commemorative

2010-05-16 Thread Remek Kocz
I think you hit the nail on the head. The way the soft-drink industry is going, I expect the 2L bottle to be replaced with the more familiar 2 qt. bottle. I'm already seeing the 1/2 L bottles being phased out in favor of 16 oz. Remek On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 5:46 AM, John M. Steele

[USMA:47389] Re: A silly milliliter--Coca Cola commemorative

2010-05-16 Thread John M. Steele
And it is a convenient downsize in the face of rising sugar and HFCS prices. From: Remek Kocz rek...@gmail.com To: U.S. Metric Association usma@colostate.edu Cc: U.S. Metric Association usma@colostate.edu Sent: Sun, May 16, 2010 9:24:25 AM Subject: [USMA:47388]

[USMA:47390] Re: A silly milliliter--Coca Cola commemorative

2010-05-16 Thread Paul Trusten
Paul Trusten Public Relations Director U.S. Metric Association, Inc. www.metric.org trus...@grandecom.net +1(432)528-7724 On May 16, 2010, at 8:24, Remek Kocz rek...@gmail.com wrote: I think you hit the nail on the head. The way the soft-drink industry is going, I expect the 2L bottle to

[USMA:47391] Re: A silly milliliter--Coca Cola commemorative

2010-05-16 Thread mechtly
What do inspectors of net contents actually do? NCWM prescribes a tedious statistical process of maximum allowed deviations from mean values from selected samples of a product. Are the measured values the SI values or the non-SI values? Is there first a comparison of declared values (SI vs

[USMA:47392] Re: A silly milliliter--Coca Cola commemorative

2010-05-16 Thread John M. Steele
I'm not an inspector and never worked in this industry.  Accordingly to published data, they must compare (by conversion accurate to at least six sig. figures) the two declared contents and determine which claim is larger.  They then test to that claim, using a sample average and statistics

[USMA:47393] Re: A silly milliliter--Coca Cola commemorative

2010-05-16 Thread mechtly
John, On Page 11 of NIST Handbook 133, Internet 2005, is the requirement that the larger of the two declarations must be verified (after comparison of SI and non-SI declarations to at least six digits) as you note. The Maximum Allowable Variation (MAV) addresses deviations from the larger