This would be a case of substitution (vs. conversion) where in new rational 
metric size is used for the value of the measurement for the item being 
converted. While conversion maintains the original standard value (rounded 
appropriately for accuracy and precision), substitution defines a new standard 
value for the measurement. Substitution should not be confused with rounding.

Substituting new rational speed limits would be appropriate although some sign 
distances may have to be conversions since the sign location for larger 
overhead signs would be costly to change. Sometimes distances are not very 
accurate on signs anyhow since the placement of a sign is not always easily 
located by the distance so indicated based on constraints such as steep slopes, 
bridges, other signs etc.

For more information on Substitution vs. conversion refer to Annex B.7 
Conversion versus substitution Transitioning from traditional inch-pound units 
to American National Standard for Metric Practice (SI 10) April 2011.

Howard R. Ressel
Project Design Engineer

New York State Department of Transportation

From: owner-u...@colostate.edu [mailto:owner-u...@colostate.edu] On Behalf Of 
Mike Giron
Sent: Sunday, July 05, 2015 7:58 PM
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:54778] Re: International Coverage in Metric

Off topic but I've often wondered, when we finally complete the transition to 
the metric system how will speed limits and distances be labeled? Will the be 
rounded? For instance 35 mph would be 60 km/h but 40 mph would also be 60 km/h, 
15 mph would be 20 km/h? Distances, 1 mile is 1.6 km but would this be rounded 
up to 2 km? Will distances be rounded up or down as needed or will decimals be 
in place? I.E.: 1/4 mi 400 m, 1/2 mi 800 m, 3/4 mi 1.2 km or will it be 1 km? 
I've attached a visual I made so you get the 
idea[https://files.acompli.net/attach?iid=(null)&aid=0ca499ab-0a26-4dd2-90ad-7b1c8286632e&account_id=3]
.
Sent from Outlook<http://taps.io/outlookmobile>



On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 4:48 PM -0700, "Peter Goodyear" 
<p...@alphalink.com.au<mailto:p...@alphalink.com.au>> wrote:

Reply via email to