Re: [uug] Daily Universe Watch: More drivel

2005-02-11 Thread Andrew Jorgensen
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:17:15 -0700, Brian Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the majority of consumers will restrain themselves, the music industry will follow suit. I guess because of the hundreds of times the media industry has restrained itself from taking advantage of the consumer with

Re: [uug] Daily Universe Watch: More drivel

2005-02-11 Thread jb
Just to keep an old flame war going I will not argue that BSD is more free, except that, if you read my letter, you would notice little difference between Disney taking a work that was only protected for 28 years and making a derivitive that will be protected for 95, or more, years and a

[uug] Copyright

2005-02-11 Thread Craig J. Lindstrom
I just joined this group yesterday due to a project I am working on, which I will describe in another email, but I thought I would make some mention of this copyright issue. I have been working for the Family and Church History department of the Church for several years and developed software

Re: [uug] Daily Universe Watch: More drivel

2005-02-11 Thread Ross Werner
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Andrew Jorgensen wrote: The kind of people who steal music would steal it at any price. It's a matter of integrity, not cost. I beg to differ. I think that the vast majority of people who copy a CD for a friend, who tape music off the radio, or who download mp3s from

Re: [uug] Copyright

2005-02-11 Thread jb
Craig J. Lindstrom wrote: Think about what the church might own. /me thinks. Nope, can't think of anything. Is there something dark in our history that would draw into question the veracity of our beliefs? Or are they sacred things we don't want to see out in the public? Either way,

RE: [uug] Copyright

2005-02-11 Thread Craig J. Lindstrom
I suppose there are documents that the church does not want available for public view, or would rather not have them easily available. Not that this is one, but do you want the temple ordinance available for public view? Think a little harder :) As far as letting the copyright expire, you would

[uug] Wide open firewall

2005-02-11 Thread jb
Okay, I've been working on this for a while, but it seems the iptables nut is just too hard to crack. I even went to UVLUG's excellent firewall meeting last Saturday. I'm trying to get Devil Linux (a live cd-based firewall distro) to work, and I just can't seem to get it right. It boots fine,

Re: [uug] Wide open firewall

2005-02-11 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 11:10 -0700, jb wrote: Okay, I've been working on this for a while, but it seems the iptables nut is just too hard to crack. I even went to UVLUG's excellent firewall meeting last Saturday. excellent might be a little generous. ;) Hang tight. iptables is not that hard

Re: [uug] Copyright

2005-02-11 Thread jb
A very wise friend of mine told me there are three things I should never do because they would put my testimony in jeopardy: 1. Look at pronography 2. Break the Word of Wisdom 3. Work for the Church Frequently we assume that all things the Church does are inspired decisions made by the

Re: [uug] Copyright

2005-02-11 Thread Ryan Bowman
--- jb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Craig J. Lindstrom wrote: Think about what the church might own. /me thinks. Nope, can't think of anything. Is there something dark in our history that would draw into question the veracity of our beliefs? --jeremy The salamander letter!

RE: [uug] Copyright

2005-02-11 Thread Ross Werner
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Craig J. Lindstrom wrote: I suppose there are documents that the church does not want available for public view, or would rather not have them easily available. Not that this is one, but do you want the temple ordinance available for public view? Think a little harder :) I'm

[uug] Need help, will pay

2005-02-11 Thread Eric Groo
Recently, at the recommendation of a silly friend I tried partitioning my hard drive and trying the 9.2 build of suse available on your ftp server. After a mild catastrophe, I finagled the whole system back to a stable state only to find that my wireless card refused to work under the native

[OT] Re: [uug] Daily Universe Watch: More drivel

2005-02-11 Thread Michael Halcrow
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:32:28AM -0700, Sasha Pachev wrote: I am restraining myself from all the music filled with the content that drives away the Spirit. ... I [listen] only to ... public-domain Russian music from the 70s and 80s. Now if THAT doesn't drive away the Spirit, I wouldn't

RE: [uug] Copyright

2005-02-11 Thread Michael L Torrie
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 14:44 -0700, Craig J. Lindstrom wrote: Having said that, I have written software that is public domain (what open source was called before the current open source craze), and software that is patented. I chose. Open Source software has never been public domain. This is

Re: [uug] NAS--Minimal Linux Build

2005-02-11 Thread Andrew Jorgensen
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:50:12 -0700, Craig J. Lindstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Boot from CF (it will show up as an IDE drive) Have a look at OpenEmbedded http://www.openembedded.org/. It's become kind of the base system for a lot of embedded / CF-based distros and projects. From what I've

[uug] Job Opportunity

2005-02-11 Thread Daniel Smith
Hey everyone my company is looking to find someone to fill the following posistion as quick as possible. If you are interested please send me an email off list. Also you will have apply online at www.ballaerospace.com to the posistion in order to be considered. Source: Ball_Aerospace Job Title:

Re: [uug] Copyright

2005-02-11 Thread jb
Just a clarification: Copyright in the US has always had extensions. However, the the original system required the copyright seeker to apply for it, just like a patent, and then it was granted for on 14 years. If the creator was still alive when that expired, they could apply for a 14-year

RE: [uug] Copyright

2005-02-11 Thread Jason Holt
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Craig J. Lindstrom wrote: Actually copyrights do expire and they can only be extended if you can show they are in use. To retain the copyright these documents were imaged and are available in a collection. I think it costs around $1500. So no, it isn't really a

RE: [uug] Copyright

2005-02-11 Thread Ross Werner
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Craig J. Lindstrom wrote: Actually copyrights do expire and they can only be extended if you can show they are in use. To retain the copyright these documents were imaged and are available in a collection. I'm not sure where you're getting this information from, but I'd be

Re: [uug] Copyright

2005-02-11 Thread Jå§òÑ M
I think most people recognize that it is sometimes morally imperative to disobey an unjust law. Agreed. Many of you who filter email list into threads or filter out spam are already in violation of this patent.

Re: [uug] Need help, will pay

2005-02-11 Thread Alex Esplin
I'm emailing you, despite the fact that this is a relatively trivial problem, because constraints on my time and the speed of my internet connection have really interfered with any further efforts to tinker with this problem. I don't know exactly how much it is worth to me but I would be

RE: [uug] Copyright

2005-02-11 Thread Josh Coates
In other cases, if the information gained from the treatment (or from other research) had been published, other doctors could have improved upon it, and could have helped to improve, or even save the lives of their own patients. fyi, patents are publications that explain *exactly* how to

Re: [uug] Copyright

2005-02-11 Thread Adam H. Peterson
Josh Coates wrote: In other cases, if the information gained from the treatment (or from other research) had been published, other doctors could have improved upon it, and could have helped to improve, or even save the lives of their own patients. fyi, patents are publications that explain

RE: [uug] Copyright

2005-02-11 Thread Jason Holt
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Josh Coates wrote: patents are publications that explain *exactly* how to something works, and they are supposed to be granted only if it someone familiar with the art can reproduce it after reading the patent. Nominally, of course. In reality, they're murder to get

Re: [uug] Copyright

2005-02-11 Thread Andrew McNabb
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:15:10PM -0700, Craig J. Lindstrom wrote: Yes there are times when an unjust law must not be obeyed. But it is certainly not to get free music, movies, or software. You don't realize how screwed up things are. For example, if you use Linux, and you buy a DVD, you

RE: [uug] Copyright

2005-02-11 Thread Josh Coates
You would still be unable to perform the procedure (even your improved version of it) without a patent license from the original patent holder. adam, jason - yes, thanks for the clarification. if the new patent contained *every* part of the old patent, then you would have to license the old

RE: [uug] Favorite Open Source Windows Utilities

2005-02-11 Thread Andrew Hunter
AV: I use ClamAV for corporate antivirus protection, and Grisoft AVG for personal/home machines. Drive Recovery Tools: You can do some drive recovery with Knoppix, but I spent $150 on Spinrite 6 for it's low level functionality. Malware cleanup: I use Spybot Search Destroy, and turn on

Re: [uug] Favorite Open Source Windows Utilities

2005-02-11 Thread Mark Gardner
Curiosity. What's the big difference between ClamAV and girsoft AVG?? Pros Cons and the like. -- _\ | /_ (@ @) -oOOo-(_)-oOOo- ~Mark ~Gardner BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are

Re: [uug] Copyright

2005-02-11 Thread tuxgirl
find the solutions they need. If there were no patents, would all the biotech firms close up shop, so that no new medicines would be developed? Put yourself in their shoes: millions of people die of cancer. Their health care costs run into the billions. You have a bunch of medical