Re: [uug] How can I find out what kind of *nix box it is

2006-03-09 Thread Michael Bright
I could be wrong, but I think the traditional way to do that is using the 'uname' command. On Linux, calling 'uname' alone will return 'Linux'; on some Irix systems I have access too, it looks like 'IRIX64'; on the AIX system, I get AIX; HP-UX says HP-UX; etc. If the output is not clear

[uug] Testing

2006-03-09 Thread Scott Paul Robertson
Sorry everyone, as some may know, there have been some issues with cs accounts getting list mail. I need to generate traffic to get some tests to see what is going on. -- Scott Paul Robertson http://spr.mahonri5.net GnuPG FingerPrint: 09ab 64b5 edc0 903e 93ce edb9 3bcc f8fb dc5d 7601

Re: [uug] Testing

2006-03-09 Thread Michael L Torrie
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 12:27 -0700, Scott Paul Robertson wrote: Sorry everyone, as some may know, there have been some issues with cs accounts getting list mail. I need to generate traffic to get some tests to see what is going on. Good plan. :) BYU Unix Users Group

Re: [uug] Testing

2006-03-09 Thread Scott Paul Robertson
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 12:37:25PM -0700, Michael L Torrie wrote: On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 12:27 -0700, Scott Paul Robertson wrote: Sorry everyone, as some may know, there have been some issues with cs accounts getting list mail. I need to generate traffic to get some tests to see what is

Re: [uug] Testing

2006-03-09 Thread Grant Robinson
On Mar 09, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Michael L Torrie wrote: On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 12:27 -0700, Scott Paul Robertson wrote: Sorry everyone, as some may know, there have been some issues with cs accounts getting list mail. I need to generate traffic to get some tests to see what is going on. Good

Re: [uug] Testing

2006-03-09 Thread David Landry
Or Nano is better than Vi. Better yet: $rival[0]['name'] is better than $rival[1]['name'] because $rival[0]['stupidsupportingstatement']. David Grant Robinson wrote: On Mar 09, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Michael L Torrie wrote: On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 12:27 -0700, Scott Paul Robertson wrote: Sorry

Re: [uug] Testing

2006-03-09 Thread Nathan
On 3/9/06, Grant Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 09, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Michael L Torrie wrote: On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 12:27 -0700, Scott Paul Robertson wrote: Sorry everyone, as some may know, there have been some issues with cs accounts getting list mail. I need to generate

Re: [uug] Testing

2006-03-09 Thread Adam H. Peterson
Nathan wrote: On 3/9/06, Grant Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: VIM is better than emacs. Well, any sentence as blatantly wrong as that one would work. grin Is not! Infinity!!! BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are

[uug] Postfix Woes

2006-03-09 Thread Scott Paul Robertson
So I've been looking into a problem on a postfix server running on RHEL 4 AS. Life is good except for certain messages, from certain clients. These messages are all from the uug-list (I imagine any mailing list message that has 30+ addresses to deliver to would have the same issue). The relay

Re: [uug] How can I find out what kind of *nix box it is

2006-03-09 Thread Mark Gardner
On 3/9/06, Michael Bright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I could be wrong, but I think the traditional way to do that is using the 'uname' command. On Linux, calling 'uname' alone will return 'Linux'; on some Irix systems I have access too, it looks like 'IRIX64'; on the AIX system, I get

Re: [uug] How can I find out what kind of *nix box it is

2006-03-09 Thread Ashley Oviatt
Gabriel Gunderson wrote: On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 14:57 -0700, Mark Gardner wrote: Is there any way to tell what flavor of Linux is running? I think the best you can do is: uname -a AND cat /etc/debian_version OR cat /etc/redhat-release OR ? cat /etc/slackware-version Ash

RE: [uug] How can I find out what kind of *nix box it is

2006-03-09 Thread Brian Phillips
Mark Gardner wrote on Thursday, March 09, 2006 2:58 PM: Is there any way to tell what flavor of Linux is running? SURE! Just place the machine in a tub of water, making note of how much the level of water rose, and eureka! Oh... Nevermind. Brian BYU Unix Users Group

RE: [uug] Postfix Woes

2006-03-09 Thread Brian Phillips
Scott Paul Robertson wrote on Thursday, March 09, 2006 2:51 PM: Since it works for everything else, I'm lost as to what the problem is. Anyone see something like this, as google is completely lacking. I would like to help though I have never used postfix. I am just wondering what google

Re: [uug] Postfix Woes

2006-03-09 Thread Scott Paul Robertson
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:49:13PM -0700, Brian Phillips wrote: I would like to help though I have never used postfix. I am just wondering what google is lacking on? Doing a search on [ warning: process /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd signal 11 ] yields a ton of information. The error messages

[uug] Postfix Woes

2006-03-09 Thread Sasha Pachev
Mar 9 14:18:32 mead postfix/master[2367]: warning: process /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid 4379 killed by signal 11 Most likely some kind of library incompatibility. Try recompiling Postfix and see if it helps. If not, recompile with -g then ulimit -c unlimited and keep an eye out for the

Re: [uug] How can I find out what kind of *nix box it is

2006-03-09 Thread Justin Findlay
On 3/9/06, Ashley Oviatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cat /etc/slackware-version $ cat /etc/*release $ cat /proc/version Justin BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed

Re: [uug] How can I find out what kind of *nix box it is

2006-03-09 Thread Michael Bright
$ cat /etc/*release $ cat /proc/version http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/qna/11175.html That could help also. I think it all depends on how you can use all of the different solutions that have been presented. -Michael R. Bright BYU Unix Users Group

Re: [uug] Testing

2006-03-09 Thread Scott Paul Robertson
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 02:02:00PM -0700, Adam H. Peterson wrote: Nathan wrote: On 3/9/06, Grant Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: VIM is better than emacs. Well, any sentence as blatantly wrong as that one would work. grin Is not! Infinity!!! Infinity +1! Ha! -- Scott Paul

Re: [uug] Testing

2006-03-09 Thread Scott Paul Robertson
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:33:48PM -0700, Scott Paul Robertson wrote: On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:27:58PM -0700, Scott Paul Robertson wrote: On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 02:02:00PM -0700, Adam H. Peterson wrote: Nathan wrote: On 3/9/06, Grant Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: VIM is better

Re: [uug] Testing

2006-03-09 Thread Scott Paul Robertson
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:38:15PM -0700, Scott Paul Robertson wrote: On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:33:48PM -0700, Scott Paul Robertson wrote: On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:27:58PM -0700, Scott Paul Robertson wrote: On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 02:02:00PM -0700, Adam H. Peterson wrote: Nathan

Re: [uug] Postfix Woes (solved)

2006-03-09 Thread Scott Paul Robertson
This is what it was, we had a broken user account that was signed up to the list. Once postfix got to the point of looking up the user smtpd would crash (likely because of a malformed response). Removing the user from the uug-list had made it all better. Sorry for spamming the list today. Hope

[uug] Sorry for bringing down the List CS mail users

2006-03-09 Thread Adam Findley
I changed my username from af268 to adam, and subsquently confused the heck out of postfix, as ldap has entries for both, but can't do a thing about delivering mail to a directory that no longer exists. Welcome back mailing list! Adam signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature