Michael Bowe wrote:
Try something simple like
telnet 127.0.0.1 pop3
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pass password
I've tried with courier pop3.
observe# telnet 127.0.0.1 110
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to 127.0.0.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
+OK Hello there.
USER [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+OK Password
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 11:24, Andrea Riela wrote:
Try something simple like
telnet 127.0.0.1 pop3
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pass password
I've tried with courier pop3.
observe# telnet 127.0.0.1 110
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to 127.0.0.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
+OK Hello
Hi all!
I'm working on a quite critical email project.
We want to use Imap in order to reduce client management complexity
(email backups, etc...).
I'm using very happily Courier Imap and Mozilla since 2 years now
so I'm very confident with Mozilla and Courier Imap interoperability.
But
Anders Brander wrote:
+OK POP3 clients that break here, they violate STD53.
Is this an error or a warning? It does return +OK and
nothing seems wrong about the output? Is there actually any
mail waiting? Please double-check.
I don't know, in my opinion is a bug, I've never seen that with
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 10:10, Andrea Riela wrote:
Anders Brander wrote:
+OK POP3 clients that break here, they violate STD53.
I don't know, in my opinion is a bug, I've never seen that with qmail-pop3d,
only with courier-imap pop3 and pop3-ssl. There's probably a problem.
what exactly is a
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
It states clearly that POP3 clients that break here, they
violate STD53 That is courier saying that. It doesn't HAVE to be
there, but it can be.
It's a courier bug, for you?
Another thing:
they look like successful logins to me. You have an MUA
issue, and are
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 10:28, Andrea Riela wrote:
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
It states clearly that POP3 clients that break here, they
violate STD53 That is courier saying that. It doesn't HAVE to be
there, but it can be.
It's a courier bug, for you?
no, I'm asking you, what do you think is
Ken Jones wrote:
I was wondering where the best place to put a
domain wide enable/disable flag for spamassassin would be.
What do you folks think?
The idea would be to have a file checked by vdelivermail.
If spam assassin is enabled, vdelivermail calls spamc
before dropping the email into
Hello Andrea,
On Wednesday, January 14, 2004 at 5:10:16 PM you wrote (at least in
part):
When I try to download the emails through courier-imap pop3, I couldn't, and
in my /var/log/maillog I've something like:
Jan 14 10:23:07 observe pop3d: Connection, ip=[:::192.168.17.13]
Jan 14
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 11:18, Doug Clements wrote:
Ken Jones wrote:
I was wondering where the best place to put a
domain wide enable/disable flag for spamassassin would be.
What do you folks think?
The idea would be to have a file checked by vdelivermail.
If spam assassin is enabled,
Hello Andrea,
On Wednesday, January 14, 2004 at 2:43:23 AM you wrote (at least in
part):
Hi folks,
Have you ever been using ucspi-ssl to connect to pop3 service with ssl?
I've tested that, and it works fine with vchkpw.
The problem is the roaming: after the pop3 connection (with ssl), I
I assume you
are mailing the list because you are having a problem, am I incorrect?
No, I'm incorrect.
When I've seen
+OK POP3 clients that break here, they violate STD53.
I've supposed that's a bug, or that's a strange thing, a problem?
Well, I couldn't donwload my emails with courier, and
On Jan 14, 2004, at 10:26 AM, Nick Harring wrote:
Instead of checking for a file, why not use the extra space in the
vpopmail
gecos fields to store spam settings for that user?
This'd be awesome as a place to store the boolean controlling whether
we
call spam assassin or not.
The GECOS field is
On Jan 14, 2004, at 10:26 AM, Andrea Riela wrote:
The :::192.168.17.13 for me is a strange thing too. But, If you
say
no, I agree with you.
Here's the patch to fix that, currently in CVS, that will be in the
next release (which will probably be out by the end of the week).
Courier might
Andrea Riela wrote:
Then, where is my problem? Pop3 and pop3-ssl don't completely
work. The auth is ok (thanks to Michael Bowe, for the patch),
but I couldn't download the emails.
Sorry Jeremy, sorry Peter,
I'm stupid. I need a beer :)
Here, all works fine with courier-pop3. Now I check the
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
If you don't find any error logs about vchkpw failed to write
data to 'open-smtp' insert a 'strace' or similar behind
ssl-listener and let it log all file open/read/write actions.
You should see the error code, and maybe even a short note
printed by vchkpw, why it
Hi.
I just wanted to let you all know I'm very happy with this developing model.
Ken did a great job with this, but I must say _this_ is something very
different from what I'm used to regarding this software.
The development is flourishing! It's exploading!
Keep it up guys!
Greetings -
Recently I am getting a few emails that get returned saying
Connected to 207.155.248.45 but sender was rejected.
Remote host said: 550 Invalid domain terabytellc.com
or...that a host that is being sent the email to can not be found by our
email server.could this be a
martin said:
Greetings -
Recently I am getting a few emails that get returned saying
Connected to 207.155.248.45 but sender was rejected.
Remote host said: 550 Invalid domain terabytellc.com
or...that a host that is being sent the email to can not be found by our
email
Jake S wrote:
martin said:
Greetings -
Recently I am getting a few emails that get returned saying
Connected to 207.155.248.45 but sender was rejected.
Remote host said: 550 Invalid domain terabytellc.com
or...that a host that is being sent the email to can not be found by our
email
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 11:40 am, Tom Collins wrote:
You could store the boolean as a flag in the pw_gid field though.
Great idea Tom!
Here are my proposed changes for vdelivermail:
New and unused pw_gid bit for disable/enable spam filtering.
#define NO_SPAM_FILTER 0x4000
Currently the
At 09:40 AM 1/14/2004, Tom Collins wrote:
On Jan 14, 2004, at 10:26 AM, Nick Harring wrote:
Instead of checking for a file, why not use the extra space in the vpopmail
gecos fields to store spam settings for that user?
This'd be awesome as a place to store the boolean controlling whether we
call
Ken Jones wrote:
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 11:40 am, Tom Collins wrote:
snip--
with spamd started with the -v option (vpopmail support)
spamd will look in the vpopmail users directory for a
.spamassassin directory for personalized settings, local.cf file.
Qmailadmin and vqadmin can
Hello Andrea,
On Wednesday, January 14, 2004 at 7:08:39 PM you wrote (at least in
part):
If you don't find any error logs about vchkpw failed to write
data to 'open-smtp' insert a 'strace' or similar behind
ssl-listener ...
Could you send me an example?
Something like 'strace openssl
Hello:
In vpopmail's README it is recommended that if all of your pop email
accounts are under virtual domains, you can increase the security of your
pop server by running it under the uid and gid of vpopmail/vchkpw using
the tcpserver -u and -g options.
How to do this? If I change
We trying to setup a Smart Host mail router but kludge the checkuser patch
and vpopmail to verify the domain and user name before smpt'ing the mail to
the appropriate mailserver. However, we're getting stuck - the server keeps
trying to deliver the mail locally even though we have smtproutes
On Jan 14, 2004, at 12:47 PM, Jeff Koch wrote:
We trying to setup a Smart Host mail router but kludge the checkuser
patch and vpopmail to verify the domain and user name before smpt'ing
the mail to the appropriate mailserver. However, we're getting stuck -
the server keeps trying to deliver the
Tom Collins wrote:
On Jan 14, 2004, at 12:47 PM, Jeff Koch wrote:
We trying to setup a Smart Host mail router but kludge the checkuser
patch and vpopmail to verify the domain and user name before smpt'ing
the mail to the appropriate mailserver. However, we're getting stuck -
the server
Can you explain better what are you trying to do?
How the patched qmail-smtpd is run?
Have both servers the same domains declared and the same users data base?
Tonino
At 14/01/2004 14/01/2004 -0500, Jeff Koch wrote:
We trying to setup a Smart Host mail router but kludge the checkuser patch
Exactly - I tried it and it works perfectly. Thanks to both of you.
At 03:06 PM 1/14/2004, you wrote:
Tom Collins wrote:
On Jan 14, 2004, at 12:47 PM, Jeff Koch wrote:
We trying to setup a Smart Host mail router but kludge the checkuser
patch and vpopmail to verify the domain and user name
We're setting up a smart-host mail router to just handle qmail scanning.
The mail will then go to the appropriate mailserver where spam filtering
will be done and the mail dropped into vpopmail accounts.
We get about 50-60K spam emails per day that are addressed to real domains
but
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 15:26, Jeff Koch wrote:
We're setting up a smart-host mail router to just handle qmail scanning.
The mail will then go to the appropriate mailserver where spam filtering
will be done and the mail dropped into vpopmail accounts.
We get about 50-60K spam emails per day
Of course if the checkuser patch could consult a mysql database
instead it
would be cleaner but gotta live with what we have. If
anyone has a better
solution let me know.
I run a cluster of qmail/vpopmail using mysql replication and
NFS, and it all works flawlessly. I'm planning
I apologize in advance if this is formatted goofy or comes out wrong. First
time poster long time listener:) (Stupid Outlook)
I'm not sure if this is a Maildrop or vpopmail issue.
vpopmail 5.4-rc1
Maildrop 1.5.2
FreeBSD 4.4
My .qmail-default pipes all inbound mail to maildrop using the
Thanks Nick - I guess the question is whether the checkuser patch will
query the mysql database or whether it determines valid
domains/users/aliases/mailinglists by querying /etc/control/assign. From
reading the vpopmail.mysql docs it appears only the contents of vpasswd is
stored in the
Hi, i have a little question about vpopmail and imap, i have been using it
since a while but recently i got a problem, vpopmail has added new directory
(0) and put all new domains in it , but the problem is that all domains
there doesn t work with courier-imap, in fact imap only check the main
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
[...]
/usr/local/bin/sslserver -v -R -H -l 0 0 995 \
strace -f -s 4096 -o /tmp/ssl-pop3.log \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup \ [...]
Don't let this run when real users try to log in, the
password will be in '/tmp/ssl-pop3.log'. Use this only with
test accounts, if you
This is my test:
The runscript
-
#!/bin/sh
CAFILE=/usr/local/ssl/certs/pop3s.cert
CERTFILE=/usr/local/ssl/certs/pop3s.cert
KEYFILE=/usr/local/ssl/certs/pop3s.key
DHFILE=/usr/local/ssl/certs/dh1024.pem
export CAFILE CERTFILE KEYFILE DHFILE
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 380 \
Another test, with:
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 380 \ /usr/local/bin/sslserver -u 89 -g
89 -v -R -H -l 0 0 995 ktrace -f /tmp/ktrace.out /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
\ nesys.it /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21
Now I've resolved the .tmp files problem. Now I
Tom Collins sent me the FreeBSD ports patch with code to enable spamassassin.
It pretty much did the whole job except for the pw_gid flags, some
configure.in changes and a new vmoduser option to disable spam assassin.
So the patch is ready ahead of schedule, whoo hoo!
I'm running it on our mail
Good deal.. I would like to look at this.
-John
- Original Message -
From: Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 10:01 PM
Subject: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule
Tom Collins sent me the FreeBSD ports patch with code
42 matches
Mail list logo
