On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Tom Collins wrote:
Unfortunately, vchkpw up until 5.4.0 (final) was coded to the
old, incorrect cram-md5 patch. Make sure that you re-patch
qmail-smtpd with the new CRAM-MD5 patch.
from README.auth: There is no need to include additionally the
hostname in the call.
is this
On Feb 25, 2004, at 6:33 AM, Martin Kos wrote:
from README.auth: There is no need to include additionally the
hostname in the call.
is this new? .. i've thought there was some time ago some rumor
about people that haven't added the hostname in the commandline
of qmail-smtpd and have had an open
Hi,
I'm planning to convert from a normal vpopmail setup to a mysql setup.
I have been looking at the vconvert program but both the manpage and the
docs are poor.
I run it with:
./vconvert -c -m
and it says converting done on all my domains.
but where is the mysqldump? How am I suppoed to
Hi,
At 14:33 25.02.04 +0100, Martin Kos wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Tom Collins wrote:
Unfortunately, vchkpw up until 5.4.0 (final) was coded to the
old, incorrect cram-md5 patch. Make sure that you re-patch
qmail-smtpd with the new CRAM-MD5 patch.
from README.auth: There is no need to include
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Tom Collins wrote:
As for upgrading vpopmail, anyone who reads the UPGRADE file
should easily find this information:
uuups...shame on me i was upgrading from 5.3.30 (i think)
and i wasn't reading the upgrade file because i thought there
were no big changes :-( .. and
In the old scheme:
in case you miss to include the hostname, your MTA is acting as
on open relay.
exactly what i had in mind
You should prefer reading the documentation and READMEs rather
then listing to rumors.
yup you're right... for the next time i should check all the
README/UPGRADE
I have started seeing stunnel processes owned by vpopmail in the process
log. Can anyone explain what that's about? or should I be concerned?
vpopmail 6977 0.0 0.0 3272 848 ?SFeb19 0:00
/usr/sbin/stunnel -f -p /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem -l /var/qma
Best Regards,
Hi Tom:
Thanks. That's interesting. So we can do encrypted smtp and pop or imap
sessions without bothering with PGP? Any idea which email clients support that?
At 01:00 PM 2/25/2004, you wrote:
On Feb 25, 2004, at 9:43 AM, Jeff Koch wrote:
I have started seeing stunnel processes owned by
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Jeff Koch wrote:
I have started seeing stunnel processes owned by vpopmail in the process
log. Can anyone explain what that's about? or should I be concerned?
vpopmail 6977 0.0 0.0 3272 848 ?SFeb19 0:00
/usr/sbin/stunnel -f -p
Alex, Jeremy, Michael and the rest,
I just have to say that I have belonged to a number of email lists and this
has to be the best one for signal to noise ratio.
That being said, further investigations have lead me to some discoveries.
I will share them with you briefly because the symptoms
On Wednesday 25 February 2004 1:47 pm, davila wrote:
Alex, Jeremy, Michael and the rest,
I just have to say that I have belonged to a number of email lists and this
has to be the best one for signal to noise ratio.
That being said, further investigations have lead me to some discoveries.
I
OR as Ken suggests I could just make my life easier and follow standard
conventions. ;-)
Ken Jones writes:
On Wednesday 25 February 2004 1:47 pm, davila wrote:
Alex, Jeremy, Michael and the rest,
I just have to say that I have belonged to a number of email lists and this
has to be the best
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Jeff Koch wrote:
I have started seeing stunnel processes owned by vpopmail in the process
log. Can anyone explain what that's about? or should I be concerned?
vpopmail 6977 0.0 0.0 3272 848 ?SFeb19 0:00
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 04:30:56PM -0500, X-Istence wrote:
Any idea which email clients support that? [SSL]
There're some: Lookout Quickly can do, IIRC, so can 'The Bat!',
'Pocomai', 'Becky' and Eudora (to name the Windows fraction). Some of
them even can 'STARTTLS'. For *nix there also a few:
Hello!
I have problems with my qmail-setup, and I'm not sure where to start
looking. I have a fairly new installation of qmail, vpopmail,
spamassassin qmail-scanner on FreeBSD 4.6.2 and currently four
different domains. Now, some of my users have complained that sometimes
people are unable
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 07:33, Martin Kos wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Tom Collins wrote:
from README.auth: There is no need to include additionally the
hostname in the call.
is this new? .. i've thought there was some time ago some rumor
about people that haven't added the hostname in the
davila wrote:
1) Destroy all spammers and take back our network
2) Write a small proxy listener that I can connect to and forward the
traffic to my smtp server.
3) Continue being happy using my sqwebmail install when I am out a lovely
little cafes
Of the possible solutions 3 seems to be the
17 matches
Mail list logo
