Re: [vchkpw] PHP extension for vpopmail

2004-03-01 Thread rainer
Eduardo M. Bragatto wrote: Rick Widmer wrote: There are two ways to run the extension that I know of. o Start a separate instance of Apache on its own port or IP address, running as the mail user. This instance should only serve mail related pages. This is very easy to do. o Don't

Re: [vchkpw] Problems with SMTP Relay

2004-03-01 Thread Marcos Dutra
I suggest smtp authenticate then pop before smtp. Marcos Em Sex 27 Fev 2004 10:57, Juliano Primavesi - CyberWeb Networks escreveu: Where can I find this patch? Juliano Neil Spierling wrote: Is there any special way of configure'ing vpopmail when tcpserver has the patch applied n

Re: [vchkpw] POP3 Delays

2004-03-01 Thread Troy Bouchard
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 16:54, W.D.McKinney wrote: not reliable? nonsense. My customers routinely send messages up to 100MB in size. Paul is correct. We see large files all the time. No problems. Dee Does anyone have a fix then? Is there something I need to give you to work out

Re: [vchkpw] Problems with SMTP Relay

2004-03-01 Thread Juliano Primavesi - CyberWeb Networks
Oi marcos, Qual, patch vocês instalaram aí? Juliano Marcos Dutra wrote: I suggest smtp authenticate then pop before smtp. Marcos Em Sex 27 Fev 2004 10:57, Juliano Primavesi - CyberWeb Networks escreveu: Where can I find this patch? Juliano Neil Spierling wrote: Is there

[vchkpw] I had a problem with this (Was: Re: [vchkpw] How do I enable roaming users?)

2004-03-01 Thread Marc Nicholas
FYI...I couldn't get -enable-roaming-users=y working on a recent installation. Solution turned out to not use the 5.2.2 version on the Inter7 site and download the 5.4.0 dev snapshot! Worked like a treat after that... (Netqmail-1.05 on RH9 install). -marc

[vchkpw] Re: Quota Usage Plugin - UPDATED PATCH

2004-03-01 Thread Tom Collins
On Mar 1, 2004, at 3:37 AM, frankie wrote: After patch, vsetuserquota seems to be ok. But problem still exist if the email account is created or amended by qmailadmin. Any other suggestion ? I guess you're right. I'm surprised no one reported this earlier -- this code has been in vpopmail for