Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

2004-05-21 Thread DEBO Jurgen E. G.
Hello blist, Friday, May 21, 2004, 2:00:08 AM, you wrote: b I am installing vchkpw + SMTP AUTH + qmail. I have installed qmail with b this patch: bqmail-smtpd-auth-0.31 from b http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/ b Here is my run tcpserver script for qmail-smtpd: b exec

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

2004-05-21 Thread Jeremy Kister
On Friday, May 21, 2004 5:41 AM, DEBO Jurgen E. G. wrote: In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your e-mailadress and Your password of Your mailbox over the internet. Are you insinuating that this is

Re[2]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

2004-05-21 Thread magazine
Hello Jeremy, Friday, May 21, 2004, 3:47:18 PM, you wrote: JK On Friday, May 21, 2004 5:41 AM, DEBO Jurgen E. G. wrote: In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your e-mailadress and Your password of

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

2004-05-21 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Thursday 20 May 2004 09:24 pm, Brooks Roy wrote: I have put in the patch as described in the contrib README and changed it to be /bin/checkpassword instead of vchkpw and I still have the same senario. /bin/checkpassword generally needs to be run as root to authenticate users. More than

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

2004-05-21 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Friday 21 May 2004 09:11 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your e-mailadress and Your password of Your mailbox over the internet. JKister Are you insinuating

Re[2]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

2004-05-21 Thread magazine
Hello Erwin, Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:14:30 PM, you wrote: EH Hi, EH At 11:41 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote: Hello blist, In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your e-mailadress and Your password of Your

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

2004-05-21 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Friday 21 May 2004 10:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: EH This is only true for SMTP Authentication of type plain and login. EH With CRAM-MD5 its quite save. Yes, it's 'quite' safe, but You still reveal Your e-mailadress. If there are many hops between Your workstation and the smtpserver,

Re[2]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

2004-05-21 Thread magazine
Hello Jeremy, Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:20:40 PM, you wrote: JK On Friday 21 May 2004 10:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: EH This is only true for SMTP Authentication of type plain and login. EH With CRAM-MD5 its quite save. Yes, it's 'quite' safe, but You still reveal Your e-mailadress. If

Re: Re[2]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

2004-05-21 Thread Erwin Hoffmann
Hi, At 17:21 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote: Hello Erwin, Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:14:30 PM, you wrote: EH Hi, EH At 11:41 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote: Hello blist, In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent

RE: [vchkpw] vpopmail

2004-05-21 Thread Clayton Weise
If you're using maildrop it does. Or at least, mine did. -Original Message- From: Rick Widmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 3:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail Radu Spineanu wrote: Hello does the vpopmail user require a valid

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

2004-05-21 Thread Nick Harring
Title: Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Jeremy, Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:20:40 PM, you wrote: JK On Friday 21 May 2004 10:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: EH This is only true for SMTP Authentication of type plain and login. EH With CRAM-MD5 its quite save.

Re[2]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

2004-05-21 Thread magazine
Hello Nick, Friday, May 21, 2004, 8:02:19 PM, you wrote: NH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Jeremy, Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:20:40 PM, you wrote: JK On Friday 21 May 2004 10:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   EH This is only true for SMTP Authentication of type plain and login. EH With

Re[4]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

2004-05-21 Thread magazine
Hello Erwin, Friday, May 21, 2004, 7:37:15 PM, you wrote: EH Hi, EH At 17:21 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote: Hello Erwin, Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:14:30 PM, you wrote: EH Hi, EH At 11:41 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote: Hello blist, In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it

Re[2]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

2004-05-21 Thread magazine
Hello Patrick, Friday, May 21, 2004, 9:34:30 PM, you wrote: PD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PD Hello Erwin, PD Friday, May 21, 2004, 7:37:15 PM, you wrote: EH Hi, EH At 17:21 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote: PD Hello Erwin, PD Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:14:30 PM, you wrote: EH Hi, EH At

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

2004-05-21 Thread Patrick Donker
PD Ahhh...yes! A flame war...always nice :) I quote from the one who has bringing 'the gas': EH You are joking, troll Well, I did't start. This list is to help people. It's not about to be picky or to be arrogant, if someone share another view, he has the right to put his vision forward and to

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

2004-05-21 Thread X-Istence
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brooks Roy wrote: I do not have an open relay. I am trying to setup SMTP Auth. It is not working.. When users try to auth, it just keeps asking for username password over and over. Never sends. How are they authentication? with [EMAIL

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail

2004-05-21 Thread X-Istence
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Clayton Weise wrote: If you're using maildrop it does. Or at least, mine did. Seconded. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Re[4]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

2004-05-21 Thread magazine
Hello Nick, Friday, May 21, 2004, 10:13:29 PM, you wrote: NH Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NH Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NH Received: (qmail 98433 invoked by uid 1017); 21 May 2004 20:24:45 - NH Received: from venus.teleshop.name NH by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5) NH