François Wautier wrote:
Hi,
Duly noting the near absolute lack of interest in my previous email (Only
Devendra Singh responded indicating he had the same problem), I decided to
go and figure out things my way.
Good job. I use CDB, and don't know enough about using MySQL with
vpopmail to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
My squirrelmail previously can change password without any problem.
But today, when one of my user wants to change its password, there is error:
- -- server error 500. Password not changed.
What is causing this?
The version is:
vqadmin 2.3.2
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
My squirrelmail previously can change password without any problem.
But today, when one of my user wants to change its password, there is error:
- -- server error 500. Password not changed.
What is causing this?
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 07 June 2004 03:42 pm, Patrick Donker wrote:
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
My squirrelmail previously can change password without any problem.
But today, when one of my user wants to
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 07 June 2004 03:42 pm, Patrick Donker wrote:
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
My squirrelmail previously can change password without any
Hi,
I am running vpopmail 5.3.30 with qmail 1.03 and qmailadmin 1.0.29
I already set the .qmailadmin-limits to a particular domain with the
setting below but I still can send email via the mail server, why?
disable_external_relay
disable_smtp
And, I had configure vpopmail with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 07 June 2004 03:53 pm, Patrick Donker wrote:
The easiest way to rule that out is to undo your latest changes. If that
is undoable for whatever reason, you should revise if there is a rights
problem
I didn't know what happen, but when I
Rick,
François Wautier wrote:
Hi,
Duly noting the near absolute lack of interest in my previous email (Only
Devendra Singh responded indicating he had the same problem), I decided
to go and figure out things my way.
Good job. I use CDB, and don't know enough about using MySQL with
Hi,
I am using Erwin Hoffmann's qmail-smtpd-auth-0.4.2.
I have noticed that once authenticated a user can use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(where server.com is a domain listed in rcpthosts) in the FROM header. Is
there any remedy.
__
Devendra Singh
On Monday 07 June 2004 08:08 am, Devendra Singh wrote:
Hi,
I am using Erwin Hoffmann's qmail-smtpd-auth-0.4.2.
I have noticed that once authenticated a user can use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(where server.com is a domain listed in rcpthosts) in the FROM header.
even an unauthenticated user can do
Hi,
I tried to upgrade the Vpopmail software but something is not work
correctly. We used the MySQL AUTH Module.
If I read from the UPGRADE documentation, I read:
--- Upgrading to 5.4 from 5.3.x or 5.2.x is straight forward.
We dont have enabled many-domain, so we have a problem.
By
Jeremy:
Your answers are always very helpful. I had almost given up using mysql
backend on a master server. Now I am going to try again. I will keep posted.
Thanks again.
Kirti
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Kitchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 11:36 PM
To:
At 07/06/04 20:05 (), you wrote:
On Monday 07 June 2004 08:08 am, Devendra Singh wrote:
Hi,
I am using Erwin Hoffmann's qmail-smtpd-auth-0.4.2.
I have noticed that once authenticated a user can use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(where server.com is a domain listed in rcpthosts) in the FROM header.
even
I have qmail + vpopmail installed in my server and i want to block a mail from
an external domain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) only for the user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How can i do this ?
TUNET
www.tunet.tn
On Monday 07 June 2004 10:17 am, Devendra Singh wrote:
Sorry Jeremy,
Perhaps I was unable to explain the problem properly.
Suppose a Server is hosting the following domains:
abc.com
xyz.com
test.com
ok.
Now, the user [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been enabled for SMTP (not
On Monday 07 June 2004 10:13 am, Martin Leduc wrote:
Hi,
I tried to upgrade the Vpopmail software but something is not work
correctly. We used the MySQL AUTH Module.
If I read from the UPGRADE documentation, I read:
--- Upgrading to 5.4 from 5.3.x or 5.2.x is straight forward.
We
On Monday 07 June 2004 10:37 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have qmail + vpopmail installed in my server and i want to block a mail
from an external domain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) only for the user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How can i do this ?
cat EOF `~vpopmail/bin/vuserinfo -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]/.qmail
Thank you, thats working :)
Now I need to make a pre-production test.
I would like to copy my vpopmail/domains dir and my Database to my DEVEL
server.
Did I need other files? Like in the Qmail config?
Martin
From: Jeremy Kitchen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
On Monday 07 June 2004 11:33 am, Martin Leduc wrote:
Thank you, thats working :)
great.
Now I need to make a pre-production test.
ok.
I would like to copy my vpopmail/domains dir and my Database to my DEVEL
server.
ok.
Did I need other files? Like in the Qmail config?
the users/ and
On Monday 07 June 2004 4:24 am, ro0ot wrote:
Hi,
I am running vpopmail 5.3.30 with qmail 1.03 and qmailadmin 1.0.29
I already set the .qmailadmin-limits to a particular domain with the
setting below but I still can send email via the mail server, why?
disable_external_relay
disable_smtp
On Jun 7, 2004, at 10:30 AM, Ken Jones wrote:
On Monday 07 June 2004 4:24 am, ro0ot wrote:
I am running vpopmail 5.3.30 with qmail 1.03 and qmailadmin 1.0.29
I already set the .qmailadmin-limits to a particular domain with the
setting below but I still can send email via the mail server, why?
You
Can you tel me quickly what is the difference between enabled-many-domain=y
and =n?
it's only the one table per domain when no is enabled ?
Best Regards
Martin
From: Jeremy Kitchen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Upgrading from 5.2.1 to
On Monday 07 June 2004 01:39 pm, Martin Leduc wrote:
Can you tel me quickly what is the difference between enabled-many-domain=y
and =n?
as far as I know it only affects sql (mysql only?) backends, as with
--enable-many-domains=y (default) it uses one table with all of the
information, and
On Monday 07 June 2004 2:01 pm, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Monday 07 June 2004 01:39 pm, Martin Leduc wrote:
Can you tel me quickly what is the difference between
enabled-many-domain=y and =n?
as far as I know it only affects sql (mysql only?) backends, as with
--enable-many-domains=y
On Monday 07 June 2004 02:20 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
On Monday 07 June 2004 2:01 pm, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Monday 07 June 2004 01:39 pm, Martin Leduc wrote:
Can you tel me quickly what is the difference between
enabled-many-domain=y and =n?
as far as I know it only affects sql (mysql
On Monday 07 June 2004 02:22 pm, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
As an ex-database admin, I wrote the many-domains=no option as
an optimization to the database schema to save disk space.
Consider hosting one domain with 1 million email accounts.
The pw_domain(64 char) field is redundant (only one
The unified qmail patches include a patch to verify the FROM address with
authenticated user. The patch is located at
http://night.rdslink.ro/dudu/qmail/. Check README for 2004_05_02.
Hope it helps.
Shouguan Lin
-Original Message-
From: Devendra Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Monday 07 June 2004 02:22 pm, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
As an ex-database admin, I wrote the many-domains=no option as
an optimization to the database schema to save disk space.
Consider hosting one domain with 1 million email accounts.
The pw_domain(64 char) field is
On Monday 07 June 2004 03:08 pm, Rick Widmer wrote:
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Monday 07 June 2004 02:22 pm, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
As an ex-database admin, I wrote the many-domains=no option as
an optimization to the database schema to save disk space.
Consider hosting one domain with 1
On Monday 07 June 2004 3:08 pm, Rick Widmer wrote:
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Monday 07 June 2004 02:22 pm, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
As an ex-database admin, I wrote the many-domains=no option as
an optimization to the database schema to save disk space.
Consider hosting one domain with 1
On Monday 07 June 2004 03:34 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
p.s. It does bring up a real question - does anyone actually use
separate tables for each domain anymore? It would be nice if we could
remove the option some day. (It causes a number of four state ifdef
structures that are kind of
At 07/06/04 21:27 (), you wrote:
On Monday 07 June 2004 10:17 am, Devendra Singh wrote:
Sorry Jeremy,
Perhaps I was unable to explain the problem properly.
Suppose a Server is hosting the following domains:
abc.com
xyz.com
test.com
ok.
Now, the user [EMAIL PROTECTED] has
32 matches
Mail list logo
