Hello Paul,
Here's my call to the rbl's. i prefer to give some info in the 'FU'
response, to at least give them a clue where to start. we dropped
spamcop a while back, as they were listing some sites that - while
they may at times be sources of spam - are not in the main spam
sites - such
- Original Message -
From: Jasper Metselaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -C \
-a whitelist.example.com \
-r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org:\
Probable spam connection rejected. Details at
http://www.spamhaus.org; \ -r list.dsbl.org:\
Probable spam connection rejected.
At 06/07/2004 06/07/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Hi,
I believe there was some discussion about this some time ago, but recent
events have made me think of this again...
The standard chkuser patch that vpopmail uses (see Bill Shupp's update
to the original:
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
So the problem is not inside chkusr, but inside the vpopmail library.
Simply put the vpopmail library does not distinguish between 'no such
user' and 'cant open database'.
This is a known problem, that will be resolved as vpopmail will
integrate such checks (I've
Title: Re: [vchkpw] NFS / Disk Access / Load Concerns on Vpopmail cluster
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 17:21, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Tuesday 06 July 2004 04:41 pm, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
snip
Hmmm... Good suggestion, is there anything similar that
The standard chkuser patch that vpopmail uses (see Bill
Shupp's update to the original:
http://www.shupp.org/patches/chkuser-0.6.mysql.patch) has
some rather nasty behaviours.
If for some reason your mysql server is unavailable (load has
shot so high that mysql can't return a prompt
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
At 06/07/2004 06/07/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Hi,
I believe there was some discussion about this some time ago, but recent
events have made me think of this again...
The standard chkuser patch that vpopmail uses (see Bill Shupp's update
to
Charles Sprickman wrote:
I'm preparing chkuser 2.0, that will integrate all these changes, and
will improve a lot of other things.
Excellent. I also have a coworker looking at the patch to see if he can
build a workaround. I'm also considering just changing the patch to
return a temporary
On Jul 7, 2004, at 7:22 PM, Rick Widmer wrote:
Should I make a patch with just this feature against 5.4.5? Will
someone merge it - or can I?
If you can isolate that change, I'll make sure it gets into the 5.4
series.
We can make it available for testing first, and then roll it into a
release.
10 matches
Mail list logo
