[vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

2005-07-01 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Paul, On Friday, July 1, 2005 at 1:05:50 AM Paul wrote: okay, i presume then that there's a way to add permanent relay entries into the mysql database. no need for this, just edit your tcp.smtp file and add a static entry. i wish - except for this config option when i built

Re: [vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

2005-07-01 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
At 11:47 PM 6/30/2005, you wrote: i wish - except for this config option when i built vpopmail: --disable-rebuild-tcpserver-file \ neither my /service/smtpd/tcp.cdb nor /u1/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb are being accessed. vpopmail does not need to access these files. tcpserver needs to. Just add some

Re: [vchkpw] pop-before-smtp and chkuser

2005-07-01 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
There is no need to change the code... Once you've enabled #define CHKUSER_RCPT_LIMIT_VARIABLE CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT it's enought you declare this variable CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT with the limit you want before running qmail-smtpd. So add a export CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50 before running

Re: [vchkpw] [qmr] imapd: chdir Permission denied

2005-07-01 Thread James McMillan
Oh, interesting... Thanks DAve wrote: James McMillan wrote: Ok, just for fun... I chmod -R 777 the postmaster dir. Then I logged in, and sent a mail, and back, then checked the new permissions. Now the directory shows uid 89, which is my old mailservers uid for vpopmail. The new

Re: [vchkpw] qmail-tap patch + spamcontrol

2005-07-01 Thread Ronaldo Chan
qmail-tap patch can be found on http://www.inter7.com/?page=qmailtap New Release version 1.1 Mon Jun 6 13:18:04 CDT 2005 This version allows for setting a different email address for each line in the taps control file. The new syntax is email address to tap:Address to send the copy to. For

[vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Anton Butsyk
Hi list! I've setup netqmail (http://qmail.org/netqmail/) with toaster patch (http://shupp.com/patches/qmail-toaster-0.7.2.patch.bz2) on FreeBSD 5.4 with vpopmail (check user patch), courier-imap, sqwebmail (full toaster but without virus scanner at all) for network about 3k users. This is

[vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Anton Butsyk
Hi list! I've setup netqmail (http://qmail.org/netqmail/) with toaster patch (http://shupp.com/patches/qmail-toaster-0.7.2.patch.bz2) on FreeBSD 5.4 with vpopmail (check user patch), courier-imap, sqwebmail (full toaster but without virus scanner at all) for network about 3k users. This is

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Shane Chrisp
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:02 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote: Hi list! everything work but 40 qmail-smtpd processes (or less nevermind) eat my CPU time up to 100 % (CPU states: 94.5% user, 0.0% nice, 3.1% system, 2.3% interrupt, 0.0% idle) Is it actually the Qmail processes that are using the

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Shane Chrisp
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 00:19 +0800, Shane Chrisp wrote: On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:02 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote: Hi list! Is it actually the Qmail processes that are using the CPU or is it something else. Whats showing up in top or iostat/vmstat etc. That will at least give you a clue where to

Re: [vchkpw] qmail-tap patch + spamcontrol

2005-07-01 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Thursday 30 June 2005 06:14 pm, Brian Lanier wrote: My understanding was that the when addressed to someone on the BCC line it simply existed as roughly [EMAIL PROTECTED] I thought each message only had one envelope recipient so that to have the message go to multiple parties you got

Re: [vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

2005-07-01 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Friday 01 July 2005 02:09 am, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote: At 11:47 PM 6/30/2005, you wrote: i wish - except for this config option when i built vpopmail: --disable-rebuild-tcpserver-file \ neither my /service/smtpd/tcp.cdb nor /u1/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb are being accessed. vpopmail

Re: [vchkpw] pop-before-smtp and chkuser

2005-07-01 Thread Igor Grinchenko
doh. you are right. I wonder why I didn't think of that myself. it works fine, thanks! -- Igor On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 08:49:38AM +0100, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: - - There is no need to change the code... - - Once you've enabled - #define CHKUSER_RCPT_LIMIT_VARIABLE

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Anton Butsyk
Shane Chrisp wrote: On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:02 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote: Hi list! everything work but 40 qmail-smtpd processes (or less nevermind) eat my CPU time up to 100 % (CPU states: 94.5% user, 0.0% nice, 3.1% system, 2.3% interrupt, 0.0% idle) Is it actually the Qmail

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Anton Butsyk
Shane Chrisp wrote: On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 00:19 +0800, Shane Chrisp wrote: On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:02 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote: Hi list! Is it actually the Qmail processes that are using the CPU or is it something else. Whats showing up in top or iostat/vmstat etc. That will at

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Shane Chrisp
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:49 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote: For now only 11 connections to qmail: 97 processes: 11 running, 86 sleeping CPU states: 95.7% user, 0.0% nice, 2.0% system, 2.3% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 53M Active, 53M Inact, 46M Wired, 59M Buf, 329M Free Swap: 1024M Total,

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread DAve
Anton Butsyk wrote: Hi list! I've setup netqmail (http://qmail.org/netqmail/) with toaster patch (http://shupp.com/patches/qmail-toaster-0.7.2.patch.bz2) on FreeBSD 5.4 with vpopmail (check user patch), courier-imap, sqwebmail (full toaster but without virus scanner at all) for network about 3k

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Shane Chrisp
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 13:02 -0500, DAve wrote: #!/bin/sh exec 21 QMAIL=/var/qmail ME=$(head -1 $QMAIL/control/me) PATH=$QMAIL/bin:$PATH USER=${USER:=qmaild} exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 500 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -DURl $ME -x$QMAIL/control/qmail-smtpd.cdb

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Shane Chrisp
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 500 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -DURl $ME -x $QMAIL/control/qmail-smtpd.cdb -u qmaild 0 smtp \ /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -r bl.spamcop.net \ -rlist.dsbl.org \ -rcbl.abuseat.org \ $QMAIL/bin/qmail-smtpd 21 Also

RE: [vchkpw] qmail-tap patch + spamcontrol

2005-07-01 Thread Brian Lanier
-Original Message- From: Jeremy Kitchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 9:40 AM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail-tap patch + spamcontrol On Thursday 30 June 2005 06:14 pm, Brian Lanier wrote: My understanding was that the when addressed to someone

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Tom Collins
If you've got TLS, did you do the following steps (copied from Shupp's Toaster): qmailctl stop make cert # enter your company's information make tmprsadh # NOTE: This may take a LONG time # now add the followowing line to your crontab via `crontab -e` to update these temp keys each night 01

[vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

2005-07-01 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Paul, On Friday, July 1, 2005 at 9:09:22 AM Paul wrote: i wish - except for this config option when i built vpopmail: --disable-rebuild-tcpserver-file \ neither my /service/smtpd/tcp.cdb nor /u1/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb are being accessed. vpopmail does not need to access these files.