Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail + NetApp still best practice?

2006-02-23 Thread Rainer Duffner
Alex Borges wrote: While youre considering proprietary solutions and naturally, would like to pay for them, perhaps you should consider redhat's GFS thingie. Its GPL but redhat offers it with their AS for an extra $$ Ive seen it work and it seems like quite a scalable solution and tipically

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail + NetApp still best practice?

2006-02-23 Thread Rainer Duffner
Nicholas Harring wrote: Hi, when going the Maildir on NFS for clustering-route, is using NetApp Filers still considered state of the art or has something better emerged? There are plenty of other NAS options, see EMC for one vendor (also not cheap). Dell offers NAS, HP I believe does as

RE: [vchkpw] Vpopmail + NetApp still best practice?

2006-02-23 Thread Nicholas Harring
Nicholas Harring wrote: Hi, when going the Maildir on NFS for clustering-route, is using NetApp Filers still considered state of the art or has something better emerged? There are plenty of other NAS options, see EMC for one vendor (also not cheap). Dell offers NAS, HP I believe

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser + smtp auth, disable CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT when correct smt auth. how??

2006-02-23 Thread Ibiltari
Hi back, I tested the code and works as spected no problems for the moment. thank you very much! pd: i have also added simscan to my conf and whit a little bit of effort they work well together also whit the CHKUSER_DISABLE_VARIABLE modification On 2/11/06, tonix (Antonio Nati) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[vchkpw] Vpopmail 5.4.15 released (finally)

2006-02-23 Thread Tom Collins
http://vpopmail.sf.net/ 5.4.15 - released 24-Feb-06 Release Notes: This release fixes a few loose ends in the 5.4.14 release. Here are the Release Notes from 5.4.14: This release brings in the vpopmail daemon (vpopmaild) from the 5.5 development series, and fixes a few bugs from 5.4.13. If