On 2006-12-18, at 0444, Christopher Chan wrote:
Darrel O'Pry wrote:
I'm currently considering replacing qmail in my mail systems.
I was wondering if anyone had tried vpopmail with postfix or exim and
what their experiences were.
Yeah, I use vpopmail with postfix. Love it. postfix user
On 2006-12-21, at 0330, Rick Widmer wrote:
I think I remember you saying that you had your onchange script
write to a pipe, and a program running under daemontools c reads
the pipe and does the work. If so wouldn't it be a lot faster if
vpopmail just wrote to the pipe?
faster,
John Simpson wrote:
On 2006-12-18, at 0444, Christopher Chan wrote:
Darrel O'Pry wrote:
I'm currently considering replacing qmail in my mail systems.
I was wondering if anyone had tried vpopmail with postfix or exim and
what their experiences were.
Yeah, I use vpopmail with postfix. Love it.
Christopher Chan wrote:
http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/validrcptto.cdb.shtml
There is a better patch for vpopmail support in qmail. A mysql patch
that goes straight the vpopmail mysql database but I am not sure of
its location. The writer even rebuffed one of Inter7's developers when
In addition, I believe Matt Simerson authored a tcpserver mysql patch to
allow the removal of cdb files altogether. http://www.tnpi.biz - it's
great for heavily loaded servers, because constantly recompiling that
damn file with multiple processes tends to corrupt it.
Eh? Rebuilding it
Christopher Chan wrote:
In addition, I believe Matt Simerson authored a tcpserver mysql patch
to allow the removal of cdb files altogether. http://www.tnpi.biz -
it's great for heavily loaded servers, because constantly recompiling
that damn file with multiple processes tends to corrupt it.
Rick Romero wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
In addition, I believe Matt Simerson authored a tcpserver mysql patch
to allow the removal of cdb files altogether. http://www.tnpi.biz -
it's great for heavily loaded servers, because constantly recompiling
that damn file with multiple processes
Christopher Chan wrote:
John Simpson wrote:
On 2006-12-18, at 0444, Christopher Chan wrote:
Darrel O'Pry wrote:
I'm currently considering replacing qmail in my mail systems.
I was wondering if anyone had tried vpopmail with postfix or exim and
what their experiences were.
Yeah, I use
DAve wrote:
soapbox
Patch smatch, if it's a patch everyone gets to beat qmail up and
scream at each other about what a wasted never updated POS qmail is.
So patches are bad bad bad. Only software that is poor and decrepit
uses patches. But, let someone add that patch to the source code and
On Dec 22, 2006, at 5:02 AM, John Simpson wrote:
i think it's easier to just leave it as running a shell script- the
concept is a lot easier for people to understand and administer.
and again, unless you're running a huge ISP and have a steady
stream of changes, the script isn't run so
Rick Romero wrote:
DAve wrote:
soapbox
Patch smatch, if it's a patch everyone gets to beat qmail up and
scream at each other about what a wasted never updated POS qmail is.
So patches are bad bad bad. Only software that is poor and decrepit
uses patches. But, let someone add that patch to
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 21:01 +, Robin Bowes wrote:
Darrel O'Pry wrote:
I'm currently considering replacing qmail in my mail systems.
I was wondering if anyone had tried vpopmail with postfix or exim and
what their experiences were.
I'd like to make the mail server change without
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 17:44 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
Darrel O'Pry wrote:
I'm currently considering replacing qmail in my mail systems.
I was wondering if anyone had tried vpopmail with postfix or exim and
what their experiences were.
snip
I'd like to make the mail server
On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 11:02 -0600, Rick Romero wrote:
I think it would be nice to feel like to owner/author of qmail was
actually behind it. And to do that, he should be improving upon it -
that is, accepting at least the patches that we all use. Obviously it's
not a complete product,
Darrel O'Pry wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 11:02 -0600, Rick Romero wrote:
I think it would be nice to feel like to owner/author of qmail was
actually behind it. And to do that, he should be improving upon it -
that is, accepting at least the patches that we all use. Obviously it's
not a
I'm less concerned about the smtp end of the equation. I'm more
interested in the deliver half of the equation. After all that is what
vpopmail plays a part in, and that is the part of the system I hope to
keep. I do radius and ftp authentication against it.
Currently I use vpopmail with
DAve wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
John Simpson wrote:
On 2006-12-18, at 0444, Christopher Chan wrote:
Darrel O'Pry wrote:
I'm currently considering replacing qmail in my mail systems.
I was wondering if anyone had tried vpopmail with postfix or exim and
what their experiences were.
Yeah,
17 matches
Mail list logo
