[vchkpw] Off Topic: Virtual FTP Server or web-based file manager?

OK, so it's off-topic, but can anyone recommend an FTP server or web- based file manager that I can deploy on my hosting server that either integrates with vpopmail (like maybe Pure-FTPd) and has a nice interface for managing accounts? I only have two IPs for my server, so multiple clients

Re: [vchkpw] Off Topic: Virtual FTP Server or web-based file manager?

On 2007-08-15, at 0208, Tom Collins wrote: OK, so it's off-topic, but can anyone recommend an FTP server or web-based file manager that I can deploy on my hosting server that either integrates with vpopmail (like maybe Pure-FTPd) and has a nice interface for managing accounts? I only

Re: [vchkpw] Off Topic: Virtual FTP Server or web-based file manager?

On Aug 14, 2007, at 11:08 PM, Tom Collins wrote: OK, so it's off-topic, but can anyone recommend an FTP server or web-based file manager that I can deploy on my hosting server that either integrates with vpopmail (like maybe Pure-FTPd) and has a nice interface for managing accounts? I

[vchkpw] 421 unable to read controls (#4.3.0) with vchkpw

Hi, I've been trying to enable SMTP auth using vchkpw with qmail today. The login works fine, but after i issue the rcpt to command over telnet, I get the 421 unable to read controls (#4.3.0) error. Google told me it' s a permissions problem, but the permissions on the /var/qmail/control

Re: [vchkpw] Off Topic: Virtual FTP Server or web-based file manager?

On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 05:11 -0700, Bert JW Regeer wrote: On Aug 14, 2007, at 11:08 PM, Tom Collins wrote: OK, so it's off-topic, but can anyone recommend an FTP server or web-based file manager that I can deploy on my hosting server that either integrates with vpopmail (like maybe

Re: [vchkpw] 421 unable to read controls (#4.3.0) with vchkpw

Jonathan Selander wrote: Hi, I've been trying to enable SMTP auth using vchkpw with qmail today. The login works fine, but after i issue the rcpt to command over telnet, I get the 421 unable to read controls (#4.3.0) error. Google told me it' s a permissions problem, but the permissions on

Re: [vchkpw] 421 unable to read controls (#4.3.0) with vchkpw

Doh, I don't use a patch at all. I use debian packages from http:// debian.iuculano.it/ Perhaps i could modify the source with that patch. Seems I need to patch either way. 15 aug 2007 kl. 18.41 skrev Rick Macdougall: Jonathan Selander wrote: Hi, I've been trying to enable SMTP auth

[vchkpw] [OT] spamhaus down?

Has anyone else noticed spamhaus is down? None of their rbl host names are resolving. I've tried: zen.spamhaus.org sbl.spamhaus.org xbl.spamhaus.org sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org pbl.spamhaus.org We noticed a delay in accepting email and tracked it down to rblsmtpd checks on any of those lists. Ken

Re: [vchkpw] [OT] spamhaus down?

I too cannot resolve their names. Ken Jones wrote: Has anyone else noticed spamhaus is down? None of their rbl host names are resolving. I've tried: zen.spamhaus.org sbl.spamhaus.org xbl.spamhaus.org sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org pbl.spamhaus.org We noticed a delay in accepting email and tracked it

Re: [vchkpw] [OT] spamhaus down?

I'm sorry. I didn't mean a dns lookup on the hostnames. I meant using rblsmtpd to do the query against their database. It might be related to a network issue since queries seem to be working fine on other email servers I checked. Paul Norland wrote: I too cannot resolve their names. Ken Jones

Re: [vchkpw] [OT] spamhaus down?

Ken Jones wrote: Has anyone else noticed spamhaus is down? None of their rbl host names are resolving. I've tried: zen.spamhaus.org sbl.spamhaus.org xbl.spamhaus.org sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org pbl.spamhaus.org We noticed a delay in accepting email and tracked it down to rblsmtpd checks on any of

Re: [vchkpw] [OT] spamhaus down?

I seems ok on my site.. rblsmtpd: 88.84.202.65 pid 21585: 553 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=88.84.202.65 @400046c3684a020109e4 tcpserver: end 21585 status 0 @400046c3684a0201253c tcpserver: status: 1/70 I use this.. sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org and mail-abuse.org on my server with a few

Re: [vchkpw] [OT] spamhaus down?

On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Ken Jones wrote: I'm sorry. I didn't mean a dns lookup on the hostnames. I meant using rblsmtpd to do the query against their database. But doesn't rblsmtpd need to do a DNS lookup to connect to the IP? -- Aj.

Re: [vchkpw] [OT] spamhaus down?

query's using rblsmtpd run fine overhere. Bas At 22:28 8/15/2007, you wrote: I'm sorry. I didn't mean a dns lookup on the hostnames. I meant using rblsmtpd to do the query against their database. It might be related to a network issue since queries seem to be working fine on other email

RE: [vchkpw] [OT] spamhaus down?

Neither can we. I just removed their name from our rbl checks because we were seeing some slowdowns. I bet this was the cause... We're currently using bl.spamcop.net and were using sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org. Can anyone suggest a replacement? Trey -Original Message- From: Paul Norland

Re: [vchkpw] Off Topic: Virtual FTP Server or web-based file manager?

Have you looked at webmin/usermin? Aside from that, you start looking at blackbox solutions like CPanel. HTH t - Original Message - From: Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vpopmail list vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Tue Aug 14 23:08:21 2007 Subject: [vchkpw] Off Topic: Virtual FTP Server or

Re: [vchkpw] [OT] spamhaus down?

Trey Nolen wrote: Neither can we. I just removed their name from our rbl checks because we were seeing some slowdowns. I bet this was the cause... We're currently using bl.spamcop.net and were using sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org. Can anyone suggest a replacement? cbl.abuseat.org is a fine one and you

Re: [vchkpw] [OT] spamhaus down?

I will add that on my list give it a try.. Thanks Rick.. Remo Rick Macdougall wrote: Trey Nolen wrote: cbl.abuseat.org is a fine one and you can rsync the data and run a local copy for improved performance. Regards, Rick !DSPAM:46c37534321933360265985!

Re: [vchkpw] [OT] spamhaus down?

I use Matt Simerson's toaster-watcher.pl script to keep my rbl server list 'live', and I still have sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org in my active list. Rick On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 15:28 -0500, Ken Jones wrote: I'm sorry. I didn't mean a dns lookup on the hostnames. I meant using rblsmtpd to do the query

Re: [vchkpw] [OT] spamhaus down?

Remo Mattei wrote: I will add that on my list give it a try.. Thanks Rick.. Remo Rick Macdougall wrote: Trey Nolen wrote: cbl.abuseat.org is a fine one and you can rsync the data and run a local copy for improved performance. Regards, Rick !DSPAM:46c37534321933360265985!