On Nov 14, 2004, at 10:53 PM, X-Istence wrote:
How about just [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? That would let the postmaster
know about the full mail box, if the message bounces, and also then
gives the postmaster the choice of acting upon it.
If my logic is flawed, i apologize, it is late, and i need sleep
In the headers of the overquota warning, the Return-Path: is set to email
address of the person who sent the message that caused the overquota warning
to be generated.
I dont know if this is really the desirable result. Probably would be better
not having this field generated at all ?
The
On Nov 14, 2004, at 5:58 PM, Michael Bowe wrote:
In the headers of the overquota warning, the Return-Path: is set to
email
address of the person who sent the message that caused the overquota
warning
to be generated.
I dont know if this is really the desirable result. Probably would be
better
On Nov 14, 2004, at 11:46 PM, Tom Collins wrote:
On Nov 14, 2004, at 5:58 PM, Michael Bowe wrote:
In the headers of the overquota warning, the Return-Path: is set to
email
address of the person who sent the message that caused the overquota
warning
to be generated.
I dont know if this is really
