Am Sonntag, 23. Mai 2004 03:02 schrieb Eric Ziegast:
I know this is a shameless plug, but I'm a happy customer.
Have Inter7 do a SugarBox install for less time/money than
it takes to figure it out using online resources and googled
howtos. I didn't have to second-guess or debug anything.
Hello List,
On Friday, May 21, 2004 at 5:21:36 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (at
least in part):
In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your
e-mailadress and Your password of Your mailbox over the internet.
Hello Peter,
Saturday, May 22, 2004, 6:34:03 PM, you wrote:
PP Hello List,
PP On Friday, May 21, 2004 at 5:21:36 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (at
PP least in part):
In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent
please remove this troll from the list. i'm tired of hearing this bigotry
on a technical mailing list. there is no content in this post that has
anything to do with either the list, or the thread in question.
At 11:06 AM 5/22/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before You make comments, first read
Hello List,
On Saturday, May 22, 2004 at 8:06:41 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (at
least in part):
[full quote snipped]
Before You make comments, first read the previous post.
Well, ok. *erm* I just recognize: already done.
I am talking about TLS, smtps
You are. In fact you are.
But maybe I
Hello Peter,
Saturday, May 22, 2004, 9:03:21 PM, you wrote:
PP Hello List,
PP On Saturday, May 22, 2004 at 8:06:41 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (at
PP least in part):
PP [full quote snipped]
Before You make comments, first read the previous post.
PP Well, ok. *erm* I just recognize: already
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Your first message, which started this flamewar.
snip
Roy,
In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your
e-mailadress and Your password of Your mailbox
Hello X-Istence,
Saturday, May 22, 2004, 11:06:33 PM, you wrote:
XI -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
XI Hash: SHA1
XI Your first message, which started this flamewar.
snip
Roy,
In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
security as SMTP after POP, because
Hello List,
On Saturday, May 22, 2004 at 11:24:43 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (at
least in part):
The flamewar did NOT start with my message.
PLOconnection interrupt *beep*
--
Best regards
Peter Palmreuther
Bumper sticker: All the parts falling off this car are of the very
finest British
Hello List,
On Saturday, May 22, 2004 at 11:24:43 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (at
least in part):
I clearly stated to do POP3-SSL, to have afterwards a 'SMTP after
POP' functionality.
Sure. I may quote your first reply:
,- [ mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
| Activate TLS by create a certificate,
I know this is a shameless plug, but I'm a happy customer.
Have Inter7 do a SugarBox install for less time/money than
it takes to figure it out using online resources and googled
howtos. I didn't have to second-guess or debug anything.
Within 4 hours of the consultant logging in via SSH, I had
11 matches
Mail list logo
