Re: [vchkpw] chkuser + localhost as sender MX

2006-08-22 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 19.09 16/08/2006, you wrote: On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:07:28 -0700 Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've noticed some spam sending hosts, which use e.g. localhost/ 127.0.0.1 as their sender MX. When my mailserver tries to verify the sending account via bounce check (connecting to

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser + localhost as sender MX

2006-08-16 Thread Tom Collins
On Aug 14, 2006, at 7:22 AM, Veit Guna wrote: I've noticed some spam sending hosts, which use e.g. localhost/ 127.0.0.1 as their sender MX. When my mailserver tries to verify the sending account via bounce check (connecting to 127.0.0.1), the rcpt to: check is ok, because chkuser accepts

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser + localhost as sender MX

2006-08-16 Thread Lars Uhlmann
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:07:28 -0700 Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've noticed some spam sending hosts, which use e.g. localhost/ 127.0.0.1 as their sender MX. When my mailserver tries to verify the sending account via bounce check (connecting to 127.0.0.1), the rcpt to: check is

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser + localhost as sender MX

2006-08-16 Thread Veit Guna
Yes, I agree with Lars. Also other local IPs should be checked like 10.x.y.z something. regards, Veit Lars Uhlmann schrieb: On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:07:28 -0700 Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've noticed some spam sending hosts, which use e.g. localhost/ 127.0.0.1 as their sender

[vchkpw] chkuser + localhost as sender MX

2006-08-14 Thread Veit Guna
Hi. I've noticed some spam sending hosts, which use e.g. localhost/127.0.0.1 as their sender MX. When my mailserver tries to verify the sending account via bounce check (connecting to 127.0.0.1), the rcpt to: check is ok, because chkuser accepts unknown rcpt to's from localhost. Is there a