Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 problem

2006-09-05 Thread Indalecio Trujillo
Make all the changes, but qmail accept email for users that not existe yet, and my queue is full. Example with info of my logs file. I send a email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but this address not exist, but my mail server accept the email chkuser say that rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 problem

2006-09-05 Thread Indalecio Trujillo
?, how do like this? Excuse me please, with old version of chkuser i never make enabling bouncing and chkuser work property, it's my first instalation with version 2 of chkuser, and have this problems. When enable boucing? tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Did you enable bouncing for

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 problem

2006-09-05 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Please don't consider previous answer, I made a salad of variables mixed in a wrong way. To disable sender checking for selected addresses: #define CHKUSER_SENDER_NOCHECK_VARIABLE SENDER_NOCHECK :allow,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 problem

2006-09-05 Thread Indalecio Trujillo
tonix the following information is for my tcp.smtp file? #define CHKUSER_SENDER_NOCHECK_VARIABLE SENDER_NOCHECK :allow,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan 63.245.25.60:allow,SENDER_NOCHECK=,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan and uncomment #define CHKUSER_ALWAYS_ON on chkuser_setting.h

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 problem

2006-09-05 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 16.51 05/09/2006, you wrote: tonix the following information is for my tcp.smtp file? #define CHKUSER_SENDER_NOCHECK_VARIABLE SENDER_NOCHECK :allow,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan 63.245.25.60:allow,SENDER_NOCHECK=,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan and uncomment #define

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 problem

2006-09-04 Thread Indalecio Trujillo
make this changes on my server uncoment this lines #define CHKUSER_SENDER_NOCHECK_VARIABLE SENDER_NOCHECK #define CHKUSER_STARTING_VARIABLE CHKUSER_START it's my tcp.smtp :allow,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 problem

2006-09-04 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 22.13 04/09/2006, you wrote: make this changes on my server uncoment this lines #define CHKUSER_SENDER_NOCHECK_VARIABLE SENDER_NOCHECK #define CHKUSER_STARTING_VARIABLE CHKUSER_START it's my tcp.smtp :allow,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan

[vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 problem

2006-09-01 Thread Indalecio Trujillo
Today setup a new mail server. I have 1 mail server with 2 domain, 1 domain to internet access and 1 domain only local user. the server is on my dmz the problem is when the sender is from internal domain the chkuser say the following CHKUSER rejected sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 problem

2006-09-01 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 20.47 01/09/2006, you wrote: Today setup a new mail server. I have 1 mail server with 2 domain, 1 domain to internet access and 1 domain only local user. the server is on my dmz the problem is when the sender is from internal domain the chkuser say the following CHKUSER rejected sender: from

[vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2005-10-12 Thread Net
./load qmail-smtpd rcpthosts.o commands.o timeoutread.o \ timeoutwrite.o ip.o ipme.o ipalloc.o control.o constmap.o \ received.o date822fmt.o now.o qmail.o cdb.a fd.a wait.a \ datetime.a getln.a open.a sig.a case.a env.a stralloc.a \ alloc.a substdio.a error.a str.a fs.a auto_qmail.o `cat \

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2005-10-12 Thread Remo Mattei
a little to little info. what patch did u apply is this netqmail etc... Remo - Original Message - From: Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 12:01 Subject: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 ./load qmail-smtpd rcpthosts.o commands.o timeoutread.o

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2005-10-12 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Wednesday 12 October 2005 11:01 am, Net wrote: ./load qmail-smtpd rcpthosts.o commands.o timeoutread.o \ timeoutwrite.o ip.o ipme.o ipalloc.o control.o constmap.o \ received.o date822fmt.o now.o qmail.o cdb.a fd.a wait.a \ datetime.a getln.a open.a sig.a case.a env.a stralloc.a \ alloc.a

[vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and Gentoo ebuild

2005-02-25 Thread Jonathan Shaw
Has anyone gotten the chkuser 2.0 patch to work with gentoo ebuild? -Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-27 Thread Brian Lanier
-Original Message- From: tonix (Antonio Nati) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 9:12 AM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: RE: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql At 17.47 20/01/2005, you wrote: So based on what you have said, if chkuser relies on vpopmail

RE: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-20 Thread Brian Lanier
-Original Message- From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 3:29 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql Brian Lanier wrote: -Original Message- From: Jeremy Kitchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

RE: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-20 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 17.47 20/01/2005, you wrote: So based on what you have said, if chkuser relies on vpopmail commands to determine existence then my current setup should work just fine. If chkuser directly reads the virtualdomains file, then I will have problems. Hi Brian, chkuser relies on vpopmail for domains

RE: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-19 Thread Brian Lanier
-Original Message- From: Jeremy Kitchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 3:03 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql On Tuesday 18 January 2005 03:23 pm, Brian Lanier wrote: This is where I am not clear and would love

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-19 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 01:42 pm, Brian Lanier wrote: -Original Message- From: Jeremy Kitchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 3:03 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql On Tuesday 18 January 2005 03:23 pm

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-19 Thread Rick Macdougall
Brian Lanier wrote: -Original Message- From: Jeremy Kitchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 3:03 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql On Tuesday 18 January 2005 03:23 pm, Brian Lanier wrote: This is where I am not clear

RE: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-18 Thread Brian Lanier
Quexion No more spam. No more viruses. www.quexion.com -Original Message- From: tonix (Antonio Nati) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 1:17 AM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql I feel these two statements are not in opposition

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-18 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 03:23 pm, Brian Lanier wrote: Ok... Maybe I don't understand qmail as much as I thought or I can't find the info in the man pages. My understanding is if the domain is listed in virtualdomains, then qmail-send treats this delivery as local and will not read

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-14 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
I feel these two statements are not in opposition. chkuser checks recipients only for domains who are in virtualdomains. When a domain is already inside virtualdomains, for a new user you may simply add a new line with MySQL vpopmail database, and the user will be added automatically as it is

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-14 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 10.17 14/01/2005, you wrote: I feel these two statements are not in opposition. chkuser checks recipients only for domains who are in virtualdomains. When a domain is already inside virtualdomains, for a new user you may simply add a new line with MySQL vpopmail database, and the user will be

[vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-12 Thread Brian Lanier
Quick question that I can't seem to sort out myself. I see people are doing the same thing based on the archives but I can't seem to find a definitive answer. Using a smart host relay to do initial mail checking running qmail. All my virtual domains are setup up correctly but not listed in the

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-10-21 Thread Tom Collins
On Oct 19, 2004, at 8:14 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote: The one thing that kind of grabbed people's interest was the flood of connection dropped messages that mysql will log if I enable the log warnings option. On other mysql installations I can leave this on and I just see the occasional error.

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-10-21 Thread Dave Goodrich
Tom Collins wrote: On Oct 19, 2004, at 8:14 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote: The one thing that kind of grabbed people's interest was the flood of connection dropped messages that mysql will log if I enable the log warnings option. On other mysql installations I can leave this on and I just see

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-10-21 Thread Rodrigo P. Telles
Hi Folks, I've been experimenting some problems about MySQL connections too. Aparently connections with MySQL wasn't closed (or something like that) and the server's load started to grow up. At the begining, I thought that the problem was in MySQL's configuration (timeouts, etc); but it wasn't. I

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-10-19 Thread X-Istence
On Oct 19, 2004, at 11:14 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote: While it's apparently not fatal to not properly close the mysql connection, I suspect that it's adversely affecting performance. Well, the connection will remain open till MySQL notices the connection is closed. We had this with several C

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-10-14 Thread Eric Ziegast
Rick Macdougall asked I didn't see anything in the docs or change logs specifically regarding the mysql connection problem that sometimes crops up with vpopmail. Has this been addressed ? Antonio Nati replied: Yes, chkuser 2.0 includes a new call, vauth_open(), that Rick Widmer told is in

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-10-14 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Eric, we are waiting for the release of this feature, that should already be in CVS. See this previous message: Charles Sprickman wrote: Take a look at vpopmail CVS HEAD. What I did was add a vauth_open() function in vmysql.c, and every other authentication back end that did not already have

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-10-14 Thread Dave Goodrich
Eric Ziegast wrote: Rick Macdougall asked I didn't see anything in the docs or change logs specifically regarding the mysql connection problem that sometimes crops up with vpopmail. Has this been addressed ? Antonio Nati replied: Yes, chkuser 2.0 includes a new call, vauth_open(), that Rick

[vchkpw] Safe closing of DB connections - it was Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-10-14 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 14/10/2004 14/10/2004 -0500, you wrote: Several people, myself included, are still seeing problems with MySQL under a large useage. So far I have not been able to get to the cause of the problem other than to convince myself I have no network or MySQL issues. I don't know C well enough to

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-10-13 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Thursday 23 September 2004 06:25 pm, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 23/09/2004 23/09/2004 -0400, you wrote: I didn't see anything in the docs or change logs specifically regarding the mysql connection problem that sometimes crops up with vpopmail. Has this been addressed ? Yes, chkuser

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-10-13 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 13/10/2004 13/10/2004 -0500, you wrote: as a suggestion, would it be possible to have a definition placed into vpopmail.h such as: #define HAVE_VAUTH_OPEN that way programs that link against vpopmail can support both methods without any user intervention, and also this way, if say perhaps

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 - doc typos

2004-09-24 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
sending to who a who's sending to whom Ciao, Remo - Original Message - From: tonix (Antonio Nati) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 4:16 PM Subject: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 chkuser 2.0 has been released. New version is available on: http

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-09-24 Thread Ken Jones
On Thursday 23 September 2004 05:16 pm, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: chkuser 2.0 has been released. New version is available on: http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser. These are the most evident changes: - new design, a lot more easy to install and update - extended

[vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-09-23 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
chkuser 2.0 has been released. New version is available on: http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser. These are the most evident changes: - new design, a lot more easy to install and update - extended logging - flexible and powerful tarpitting - quota checking

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-09-23 Thread Rick Macdougall
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: chkuser 2.0 has been released. New version is available on: http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser. These are the most evident changes: - new design, a lot more easy to install and update - extended logging - flexible and powerful

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-09-23 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 23/09/2004 23/09/2004 -0400, you wrote: I didn't see anything in the docs or change logs specifically regarding the mysql connection problem that sometimes crops up with vpopmail. Has this been addressed ? Yes, chkuser 2.0 includes a new call, vauth_open(), that Rick Widmer told is in

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-09-23 Thread Rick Macdougall
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 23/09/2004 23/09/2004 -0400, you wrote: I didn't see anything in the docs or change logs specifically regarding the mysql connection problem that sometimes crops up with vpopmail. Has this been addressed ? Yes, chkuser 2.0 includes a new call, vauth_open(), that

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0

2004-09-23 Thread Remo Mattei
Tonix cambia questo who's sending to who a who's sending to whom Ciao, Remo - Original Message - From: tonix (Antonio Nati) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 4:16 PM Subject: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 chkuser 2.0 has been released. New version