People has not the courage to say that Bernstein design and coding is
horrible.
???
QMAIL was a secure product and a good academic programming model, ten
years ago. Now, a modern MTA facing millions of emails has completely
different problems from the ones Bernstein faced. But he made a
At 14.14 15/01/2007, you wrote:
People has not the courage to say that Bernstein design and coding
is horrible.
???
QMAIL was a secure product and a good academic programming model,
ten years ago. Now, a modern MTA facing millions of emails has
completely different problems from the ones
QMAIL was a secure product and a good academic programming model, ten
years ago. Now, a modern MTA facing millions of emails has completely
different problems from the ones Bernstein faced. But he made a
closed architecture, not a modular one, adding a no-sense license.
Hmm...qmail is STILL
Guys, in the interest of advancing the science of vpopmail, would you
please consider taking this discussion/argument/difference-of-opinion
offline?
I'm keenly anxious to see the possible new directions that vpopmail may
grow given the several threads of recent activity.
Your energy and
Dave Richardson wrote:
Guys, in the interest of advancing the science of vpopmail, would you
please consider taking this discussion/argument/difference-of-opinion
offline?
+1
I'm keenly anxious to see the possible new directions that vpopmail may
grow given the several threads of recent
I'm thinking to extend chkuser, and add an smtp fake delivery for
checking recipients existance on end systems (i.e. when domains are
external and use me as proxy SMTP).
But I'm really tired to fight with qmail. Bernstein programming is
accademic and heavy to use, license is criminal.
Alle 12:31, giovedì 11 gennaio 2007, tonix (Antonio Nati) ha scritto:
I'm thinking to extend chkuser, and add an smtp fake delivery for
checking recipients existance on end systems (i.e. when domains are
external and use me as proxy SMTP).
But I'm really tired to fight with qmail. Bernstein
AM
Subject: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on dmz
I'm thinking to extend chkuser, and add an smtp fake delivery for
checking recipients existance on end systems (i.e. when domains are
external and use me as proxy SMTP).
But I'm really tired to fight with qmail
.
Tonino
-M
- Original Message
From: tonix (Antonio Nati) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:31:40 AM
Subject: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on dmz
I'm thinking to extend chkuser, and add an smtp fake delivery
Hello all,
I have this setup : mail coming to relay server located in DMZ, and
this server is relaying x domains to internal LAN mail server.
Im receiving lot of unwanted mails for nonexistent addresses.
Ho I can handle it ? Chkuser is working fine when are domains on
server, but how I can check
Miki wrote:
Hello all,
I have this setup : mail coming to relay server located in DMZ, and
this server is relaying x domains to internal LAN mail server.
Im receiving lot of unwanted mails for nonexistent addresses.
Ho I can handle it ? Chkuser is working fine when are domains on
server, but
Miki wrote:
Hello all,
I have this setup : mail coming to relay server located in DMZ, and
this server is relaying x domains to internal LAN mail server.
Im receiving lot of unwanted mails for nonexistent addresses.
Ho I can handle it ? Chkuser is working fine when are domains on
server, but
On Jan 10, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Miki wrote:
Ho I can handle it ? Chkuser is working fine when are domains on
server, but how I can check user existency on remote server ?
FYI: rsync of passwd.cdb is ok, but how check against aliases ?
rsync ~vpopmail/domains but have it ignore any directory with
13 matches
Mail list logo
