is
in Canadian... ;)
Regardless I hope you can track down your problem!
Regards,
Tren
From: James Cox ja...@imaj.es
To: vchkpw@inter7.com vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote
Thank you James, grazie Tonino.
!DSPAM:4a30ba6832669637967409!
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote:
Patch in Shupp toaster is taken from Erwin Hoffmann's SMTP-AUTH (http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html
).
qmail 1.0.5 and 1.0.6 should be extremely similar and I wonder if
it is worth using 1.0.6.
Weird, i installed the patch with Erwin's
From: James Cox ja...@imaj.es
To: vchkpw@inter7.com vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote:
Patch in Shupp
...@imaj.es
To: vchkpw@inter7.com vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote:
Patch in Shupp toaster is taken from Erwin Hoffmann's SMTP-AUTH (http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html
).
qmail
!
Regards,
Tren
From: James Cox ja...@imaj.es
To: vchkpw@inter7.com vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote:
Patch in Shupp toaster is taken from Erwin Hoffmann's SMTP-AUTH
- Original Message -
From: James Cox
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
I just did a fresh install of toaster.
i'm still getting these frustrating smtp auth problems - it's
conflating
is in
Canadian... ;)
Regardless I hope you can track down your problem!
Regards,
Tren
From: James Cox ja...@imaj.es
To: vchkpw@inter7.com vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote
Brian Lanier ha scritto:
- Original Message -
*From:* James Cox mailto:ja...@imaj.es
*To:* vchkpw@inter7.com mailto:vchkpw@inter7.com
*Sent:* Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
*Subject:* Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
I just did a fresh install
: James Cox ja...@imaj.es
To: vchkpw@inter7.com vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote:
Patch in Shupp toaster is taken from Erwin Hoffmann's SMTP-AUTH
(http
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
1758 CHKUSER accepted sender
and... in my defines...
neither of
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
1758 CHKUSER
James Cox wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
I used Bill's and works fine. I do have chkuser installed on mine with smtp
auth.
Remo
On 6/10/09 9:25 AM, Rick Macdougall ri...@ummm-beer.com wrote:
James Cox wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Cox wrote:
yeah, i saw that patch. but i am using the current version (i think?) 0.31
I'm not really sure *why* it would be happening and I don't really have a
solution
to pose to you. I just wanted you to be aware that the output you were
Here is mine you can try to use my settings..
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
export QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan
export NOP0FCHECK=1
export SIMSCAN_DEBUG=0
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 2200 \
Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Roberto
James Cox ha scritto:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Roberto
James Cox ha scritto:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth patch which breaks the output.
In the past other people with other auth patches
James Cox ha scritto:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth patch which breaks the output.
In the past other people
James Cox wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth patch which breaks the output.
In the past other people with
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:00, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
James Cox ha scritto:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth
Hey,
Here's an (edited) example of a smtp conversation, with a netqmail
install with smtp auth and chkuser patches:
220 mail.23i.net ESMTP
EHLO imaj.es
250-mail.23i.net
250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
250-AUTH=LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
250-PIPELINING
250 8BITMIME
AUTH LOGIN
334 VXNlcm5hbWU6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Cox wrote:
Anyone got any tips for how to skip those log lines? I've been looking
at the chkuser_settings and i'm not confident i've seen anything
immediately obvious. I'm also not convinced that these lines should ever
exist in the smtp
On 9 Jun 2009, at 18:16, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Cox wrote:
Anyone got any tips for how to skip those log lines? I've been
looking
at the chkuser_settings and i'm not confident i've seen anything
immediately obvious. I'm also not convinced
Hi James,
You are copying stderr (file descriptor 2) to your stdout (that's what
the terminating 21 is for). However, this log is only saved if
multilog is indeed catching it.
Find in the directory where this `run' file was located the directory
`log', and publish the content of the `run'
hey Harm,
Here's the run file for the log -
exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t
s250 n 10 /var/log/qmail/smtpd
and yeah- i figured that i'm pushing to stdout... which i expect the
log/run should catch via the multilog. therefore i'm a bit confused as
to
Hi James,
What version of chkuser are you using?
When I look at the 2.0.9 source, I see the following lines inside
chkuser_settings.h:
/*
* the following line enables debugging of chkuser
*/
/* #define CHKUSER_DEBUG */
/*
* The following line moves DEBUG output from STDOUT (default) to
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
1758 CHKUSER accepted sender
and... in my defines...
neither of those two are
30 matches
Mail list logo
